The literature on excise tax rates has provided mixed evidence concerning how partisan ideology affects tax changes. Using a regression discontinuity design and a panel of U.S. states over the period 1970–2019 I find no significant difference in cigarette, distilled spirits, or gasoline excise tax rates between Democratic governors and Republican governors elected by a similar margin. This result is found regardless of whether the governor can run for an additional term or faces a binding term limit. These results are robust to an analysis of the post-southern realignment period, when controlling for southern Democrats, or when analyzing open elections without an incumbent in the running. An implication of this result is that interstate tax competition and the mobility of the tax base dwarfs any ideological differences with respect to excise tax policy.
AltJames ELassenDavid Dreyer. 2014. “Enforcement and public corruption: Evidence from the American states.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization30.2: 306–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ews036
2.
BelandLouis-PhilippeOloomiSara. 2017. “Party affiliation and public spending: Evidence from US governors.” Economic Inquiry55 (2): 982–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12393
3.
BesleyTimothy JRosenHarvey S. 1998. “Vertical externalities in tax setting: Evidence from gasoline and cigarettes.” Journal of Public Economics70 (3): 383–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00041-3
4.
CameronA ColinGelbachJonah BMillerDouglas L. 2008. “Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors.” The Review of Economics and Statistics90.3: 414–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.3.414.
5.
CampbellJames E. 2018. Polarized: Making sense of a divided America. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
6.
CattaneoMatias DJanssonMichaelMaXinwei. 2018. “Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity.” The Stata Journal18 (1): 234–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800115
DevereuxMichael PLockwoodBenRedoanoMichela. 2007. “Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: Theory and some evidence from the USA.” Journal of Public Economics91 (3-4): 451–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.07.005
9.
Esteller-MoréAlejandroRizzoLeonzio. 2014. “US Excise tax horizontal interdependence: Yardstick versus tax competition.” The Annals of Regional Science52: 711–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0607-3
10.
FerreiraFernandoGyourkoJoseph. 2009. “Do political parties matter? Evidence from US cities.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics124 (1): 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399
11.
FleenorPatrick. 1998. How excise tax differentials affect interstate smuggling and cross-border sales of cigarettes in the United States. Washington, DC, USA: Tax Foundation.
12.
FredrikssonPer GMamunKhawaja A. 2008. “Vertical externalities in cigarette taxation: Do tax revenues go up in smoke?” Journal of Urban Economics64 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.001
13.
FredrikssonPer GMamunKhawaja A. 2014. “Tobacco politics and electoral accountability in the United States.” Public Finance Review42 (1): 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142112463045
14.
FredrikssonPer GWangLeWarrenPatrick L. 2013. “Party politics, governors, and economic policy.” Southern Economic Journal80 (1): 106–26. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2011.320
15.
GelmanAndrewImbensGuido. 2019. “Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics37 (3): 447–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2017.1366909
16.
GoolsbeeAustanLovenheimMichael FSlemrodJoel. 2010. “Playing with fire: Cigarettes, taxes, and competition from the internet.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy2 (1): 131–54. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.2.1.131
17.
HeckelmanJac CDoughertyKeith L. 2010. “Majority rule versus supermajority rules: Their effects on narrow and broad taxes.” Public Finance Review38 (6): 738–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110373608
18.
HoxbyCaroline M. 2000. “The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics115 (4): 1239–85. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555060
InnesRobertMitraArnab. 2015. “Parties, politics, and regulation: Evidence from Clean Air Act enforcement.” Economic Inquiry53 (1): 522–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12142
21.
KalbDeborah eds. 2010. Guide to U.S. Elections. 6th ed. California: CQ Press.
22.
KuziemkoIlyanaWashingtonEbonya. 2018. “Why did the Democrats lose the South? Bringing new data to an old debate.” American Economic Review108 (10): 2830–67. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161413
23.
LeeDavid SLemieuxThomas. 2010. “Regression discontinuity designs in economics.” Journal of Economic Literature48 (2): 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
24.
LeeDavid SMorettiEnricoButlerMatthew J. 2004. “Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the US House.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics119 (3): 807–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502153
ListJohn ASturmDaniel M. 2006. “How elections matter: Theory and evidence from environmental policy.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics121 (4): 1249–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1249
27.
LovenheimMichael F. 2008. “How far to the border?: The extent and impact of cross-border casual cigarette smuggling.” National Tax Journal61 (1): 7–33. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.1.01
28.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith TRosenthalHoward. 2016. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA, USA: Mit Press.
29.
McCraryJustin. 2008. “Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity de- sign: A density test.” Journal of Econometrics142 (2): 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
Pettersson-LidbomPer. 2008. “Do parties matter for economic outcomes? A regression-discontinuity approach.” Journal of the European Economic Association6 (5): 1037–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1037
33.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2018. “Government ideology and economic policy-making in the United States—a survey.” Public Choice174 (1): 145–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0491-3
34.
RoodmanDavidNielsenMorten ØrregaardMacKinnonJames GWebbMatthew D. 2019. “Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in stata using boottest.” The Stata Journal19 (1): 4–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19830877
35.
StehrMark. 2007. “The effect of Sunday sales bans and excise taxes on drinking and cross-border shopping for alcoholic beverages.” National Tax Journal60 (1): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2007.1.05
36.
ThursbyJerry GThursbyMarie C. 2000. “Interstate cigarette bootlegging: Extent, revenue losses, and effects of federal intervention.” National Tax Journal53 (1): 59–77. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.1.04
