Advocates of green public procurement (GPP) argue that the public sector can use its purchasing power to influence producers and consumers to reduce their negative impact on the environment. Our aim is to assess GPP as an environmental policy instrument and its ability to lead to the achievement of environmental objectives. Central to our analysis is the extent to which polluting firms choose to adapt to the public sector’s environmental requirements and to invest in greener technologies. Our theoretical finding is that the potential of GPP to function as an objective effective instrument of environmental policy is limited and can actually be counterproductive. From an environmental policy point of view, it is crucial that the GPP aims for an environmental standard beyond the technology of the polluting firms and is designed with reference to defined environmental objectives.
AndreoniJames. 1990. “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-glow Giving.” The Economic Journal100:464–77.
2.
AskerJohnCantillonEstelle. 2008. “Properties of Scoring Auctions.” RAND Journal of Economics39:69–85.
3.
AskerJohnCantillonEstelle. 2010. “Procurement when Price and Quality Matter.” RAND Journal of Economics41:1–34.
4.
BaumolWilliam J.OatesWallace E.. 1971. “The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment.” Swedish Journal of Economics73:42–54.
5.
BergmanMats A.LundbergSofia. 2013. “Tender Evaluation and Award Methodologies in Public Procurement.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management19:73–83.
6.
BernheimB. Douglas. 1994. “A Theory of Conformity.” Journal of Political Economy102:841–77.
7.
CerinPontus. 2006. “Bringing Economic Opportunity into Line with Environmental Influence: A Discussion on the Coase Theorem and the Porter and van der Linde Hypothesis.” Ecological Economics56:209–26.
8.
European Commission. 2008. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Public procurement for a better environment {SEC(2008) 2124} {SEC(2008) 2125} {SEC(2008) 2126}.” Accessed May 17, 2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2008:0400:FIN.
9.
European Commission. 2011. Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement. 2nd ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
FriedrichsenJana. 2013. “Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality.” Discussion Paper SP II 2013–211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany, November 2013.
12.
GengYongDobersteinBrent. 2008. “Greening Government Procurement in Developing Countries: Building Capacity in China.” Journal of Environmental Management88:932–38.
13.
GlazerAmihaiKonradKai A.. 1996. “A Signaling Explanation for Charity.” American Economic Review86:1019–28.
14.
HanleyNickShogrenJason F.WhiteBen. 2007. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
HarbaughWilliam T.1998. “What Do Donations Buy? A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow.” Journal of Public Economics67:269–84.
16.
JörgensenChristian. 2012. “Mål som styrmedel—målet för den offentliga konsumtionen av ekologiska livsmedel.” Report nr 2012:1, AgriFood. [In Swedish with English summary]. Accessed May 17, 2015. http://www.agrifood.se/Files/AgriFood_Rapport_20121.pdf.
17.
JungChulhoKrutillaKerryBoydRoy. 1996. “Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management30:95–111.
18.
KrasnokutskayaElenaSeimKatja. 2011. “Bid Preference Programs and Participation in Highway Procurement Auctions.” American Economic Review101:2653–86.
19.
LiTongZhengXiaoyong. 2009. “Entry and Competition Effects in First-price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Procurement Auctions.” The Review of Economic Studies Limited76:1397–429.
20.
LundbergJohanLundbergSofia. 2012. “Distributional Effects of Lower Food Prices in a Rich Country: Calculations Based on Estimates of Household Demand for Food.” Journal of Consumer Policy35:373–91.
21.
LundbergSofiaMarklundPer-Olov. 2013a. “Green Public Procurement as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Cost Effectiveness.” Environmental Economics4:75–83.
LundbergSofiaMarklundPer-OlovStrömbäckElonSundströmDavid. 2015. “Using Public Procurement to Implement Environmental Policy. An Empirical Analysis.” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. Online first. doi:10.1007/s10018-015-0102-9.
24.
MarronDonald B.1997. “Buying Green: Government Procurement as an Instrument of Environmental Policy.” Public Finance Review25:285–305.
25.
MarronDonald B.2003. “Greener Public Purchasing as an Environmental Policy Instrument.” OECD Journal on Budgeting3:71–102.
26.
MillimanScott R.PrinceRaymond. 1989. “Firms Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management17:247–65.
27.
Parikka-AlholaKatriina. 2008. “Promoting Environmentally Sound Furniture by Green Public Procurement.” Ecological Economics68:472–85.
28.
PorterMichael E.van der LindeClaas. 1995. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment: Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives9:97–118.
29.
QiaoYuhuaWangConghu. 2011. “Issues and Challenges in Implementing China’s Green Public Program.” Journal of Environmental Protection2:1034–45.
Statistics Sweden. 2014. Yearbook of agricultural statistics 2014 including food statistics. Official Statistics of Sweden Statistics Sweden. [In Swedish with English Summary]. Accessed May 17, 2015. http://issuu.com/jordbruksverket/docs/jo01br1401v2/3?e=0.
TestaFrancescoIraldoFabioFreyMarcoDaddiTibiero. 2012. “What Factors Influence the Uptake of GPP (Green Public Procurement) Practices? New Evidence from an Italian Survey.” Ecological Economics82:88–96.
34.
TukkerArnoldEmmertSophieCharterMartinVezzoliCarloStoEivindAndersenMaj MunchGeerkenTheoTischnerUrsulaLahlouSaadi. 2008. “Fostering Change to Sustainable Consumption and Production: An Evidence Based View.” Journal of Cleaner Production16:1218–25.
35.
YiridoeEmmanuel K.Bonti-AnkomahSamuelMartinRalph C.. 2005. “Comparison of Consumer Perceptions and Preference toward Organic versus Conventionally Produced Foods: A Review and Update of the Literature.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems20:193–205.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
