This article studies equilibrium effects of fiscal policy within a dynamic general equilibrium model where tax evasion and underground activities are explicitly incorporated. In particular, we show that a dynamic general equilibrium with tax evasion may give a rational justification for a variant of the Laffer curve for a plausible parameterization. From a revenue maximizing perspective, the key policy messages are that bringing tax payers to compliance would be better than threatening to punish them if convicted and that an economy without problems of compliance is much more sensitive to myopic behavior.
AgellJonasPerssonMats. 2001. “On the Analytics of the Dynamic Laffer Curve.” Journal of Monetary Economics48:397–414.
2.
BasileRaffaellaChiariniBrunoMarzanoElisabetta. 2011. “Can We Rely upon Fiscal Policy Estimates in Countries with Unreported Production of 15 Percent (or more) of GDP?”Cesifo Working Paper No. 3521, CESifo Group Munich, Germany.
3.
BusatoFrancescoChiariniBruno. 2004. “Market and Underground Activities in a Two-sector Dynamic Equilibrium Model.” Economic Theory23:831–61.
4.
BusatoFrancescoChiariniBrunoReyGuido M.. 2012. “Equilibrium Implications of Fiscal Policy with Tax Evasion.” International Review of Law and Economics32:197–214.
5.
ChariVaradarajan V.ChristianoLawrenceKehoePatrick. 1995. “Policy Analysis in Business Cycle Models.” In Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, edited by CooleyT. F., 357–391. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
ChariVaradarajan V.KehoePatrickMcGrattanEllen R.. 2000. “Sticky Price Models of the Business Cycle: Can the Contract Multiplier Solve the Persistence Problem?”Econometrica68:1151–80.
7.
ClaridaRobertGaliJordiGertlerMark. 2002. “A Simple Framework for International Monetary Policy Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics49:879–904.
8.
CowellFrank A.1990. Cheating the Government: The Economics of Evasion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
CuñatAlejandroDekSlobodanMaffezzoliMarco. 2008. “Tax Cuts in Open Economies.” IGIER Working Paper No. 322, Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
10.
DomeijDavidFlodenMartin. 2006. “The Labor-supply Elasticity and Borrowing Constraints: Why Estimates are Biased.” Review of Economic Dynamics9:242–62.
11.
European Commission. 2007. “Public Finance in EMU 2007.” European Economy3. European Commission, Brussels.
12.
FeigeEdgar L., ed. 1989. The Underground Economy: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FioritoRiccardoKollintzasTryphon.. 2004. “Public Goods, Merit Goods, and the Relation between Private and Government Consumption.” European Economic Review48:1367–98.
14.
GaliJordi. 2003. “New Perspectives on Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle.” In Advances in Economic Theory, edited by DewatripontM.HansenL.TurnovskyS., Vol. III, 151–97. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
IrelandPeter. 1994. “Supply-side Economics and Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics33:559–71.
16.
KimballMyles S.ShapiroMatthew D.. 2003. “Labor Supply: Are the Income and Substitution Effects Both Large or Small?”Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
17.
KingRobert S.RebeloSergio T.. 1999. “Resuscitating Real Business Cycles.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics, edited by TaylorJ. B.WoodfordM., Vol. 1B, 927–1007. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
18.
KniesnerThomasJrZiliakJames P.. 2005. “The Effect of Income Taxation on Consumption and Labor Supply.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago Press.
LucasRobert E.Jr. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Development Planning.” Journal of Monetary Economics22:3–42.
21.
McGeeRichard T.FeigeEdgar L.. 1989. “Policy Illusion, Macroeconomic Instability, and the Unrecorded Economy.” In The Underground Economy: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion, edited by FeigeEdgar L., 13–56. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
McGrattanEllen R.1994. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Distortionary Taxation.” Journal of Monetary Economics33:559–71.
23.
MendozaEnrique G.TesarLinda L.. 1998. “The International Ramifications of Tax Reforms: Supply-side Economics in a Global Economy.” American Economic Review88:402–17.
24.
MerzMonika. 1995. “Search in the Labor Market and the Real Business Cycle.” Journal of Monetary Economics36:269–300.
25.
PaldaFilip. 1998. “Evasive Ability and the Efficiency Cost of the Underground Economy.” The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique31:1118–38.
26.
PappTamas K.TakatsElod. 2008. “Tax Rate Cuts and Tax Compliance: The Laffer Curve Revisited.” IMF Working Paper No. 08/07, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
27.
PrescottEdward C.MehraRanish. 1980. “Recursive Competitive Equilibrium: The Case of Homogenous Households.” Econometrica48:1365–79.
28.
SanyalAmalGangIraGoswamiOmkar N.. 2000. “Corruption, Tax Evasion, and the Laffer Curve.” Public Choice105:61–78.
29.
SchneiderFriedrich. 2007. “The Size of the Shadow Economies of 145 Countries All over the World: First Results over the Period 1999-2003.” Journal of Population Economics20:495–526.
30.
SchneiderFriedrichBuehnAndreas. 2012. “Shadow Economies in Highly Developed OECD Countries: What Are the Driving Forces?”IZA Discussion Paper No. 6891, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.
31.
SchneiderFriedrichEnsteDominic. 2000. “Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences.” The Journal of Economic Literature38:77–114.
32.
StinepringJosh R.2011. “Dynamic Scoring, Tax Evasion, and the Shadow Economy.” Public Finance Review39:50–74.
33.
TrabandtMatiasUhligHarald. 2011. “The Laffer Curve Revisited.” Journal of Monetary Economics58:305–27.
34.
TrabandtMatiasUhligHarald. 2012. “How do Laffer Curves differ across Countries?”NBER Working Paper No. 17862, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
35.
UzawaHirofumi. 1965. “Optimal Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth.” International Economic Review6:18–31.
