This article investigates whether reputation-building strategies may guide US governors’ state cigarette tax choices and whether the federal cigarette tax influences such behavior. Using 1975–2000 data, we find evidence indicating that governors are prone to engage in reputation building, in particular in states with relatively important agricultural tobacco production. Moreover, lame ducks are more prone to raise the state cigarette tax the lower the federal tax.
AlesinaAlberto. 1988. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters.”American Economic Review78:796–805.
2.
AndersonT. W.RubinHerman. 1949. “Estimation of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations.”Annals of Mathematical Statistics20:46–63.
3.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ApollonioD. E.RajaRaymond J. La. 2006. “Term Limits, Campaign Contributions, and the Distribution of Power in State Legislatures.”Legislative Studies Quarterly31:259–81.
5.
BanksJeffrey S.SundaramRangarajan K.. 1998. “Optimal Retention in Agency Problems.”Journal of Economic Theory72:293–323.
6.
BarroRobert J.1973. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.”Public Choice14:19–42.
7.
BernhardtDanDubeySangitaHughsonEric. 2004. “Term Limits and Pork Barrel Politics.”Journal of Public Economics88:2383–422.
8.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits.”Quarterly Journal of Economics110:769–98.
9.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 2003. “Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States.”Journal of Economic Literature41:7–73.
10.
BesleyTimothy J.RosenHarvey S.. 1998. “Vertical Externalities in Tax Setting: Evidence from Gasoline and Cigarettes.”Journal of Public Economics70:383–98.
11.
BodensteinMartinUrsprungHeinrich W.. 2005. “Political Yardstick Competition, Economic Integration, and Constitutional Choice in a Federation: A Numerical Analysis of a Contest Success Function Model.”Public Choice124:329–52.
12.
BruecknerJ.2003. “Strategic Interaction among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies.”International Regional Science Review26:175–88.
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Various years. State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/.
14.
ChirinkoRobert S.WilsonDaniel J.. 2010. “Can Lower Taxes be Bought? The Role of Business Rent-Seeking in Tax Competition among U.S. states.”National Tax Journal63:967–94.
15.
DevereuxMichael P.LockwoodBenRedoanoMichela. 2007. “Horizontal and Vertical Indirect Tax Competition: Theory and Some Evidence from the USA.”Journal of Public Economics91:451–79.
16.
DickAndrew R.LottJohn R.Jr. 1993. “Reconciling Voters’ Behavior with Legislative Term Limits.”Journal of Public Economics50:1–14.
17.
EderingtonJoshMinierJenny. 2008. “Reconsidering the Empirical Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Model of Endogenous Protection.”Canadian Journal of Economics41:501–16.
18.
ErlerH. Abbie. 2007. “Legislative Term Limits and State Spending.”Public Choice133:479–94.
19.
EscalerasMonica P.CalcagnoPeter T.. 2009. “Does the Gubernatorial Term Limit Type Affect State Government Expenditures?”Public Finance Review37:572–95.
20.
Esteller-MoréAlejandroGalmariniUmbertoRizzoLeonzio. 2012. “Vertical Tax Competition and Consumption Externalities in a Federation with Lobbying.”Journal of Public Economics96:295–305.
21.
Esteller-MoréAlejandroRizzoLeonzio. 2011. “(Uncontrolled) Aggregate Shocks or Vertical Tax Interdependence? Evidence from Gasoline and Cigarettes.”National Tax Journal64:353–80.
22.
Esteller-MoréAlejandroSolé-OlléAlbert. 2001. “Vertical Income Tax Externalities and Fiscal Interdependence: Evidence from the US.”Regional Science and Urban Economics31:247–72.
23.
Esteller-MoréAlejandroSolé-OlléAlbert. 2002. “Tax Setting in a Federal System: The Case of Personal Income Taxation in Canada.”International Tax and Public Finance9:235–57.
24.
FredrikssonPer G.MamunKhawaja A.. 2008. “Vertical Externalities in Cigarette Taxation: Do Tax Revenues Go Up in Smoke?”Journal of Urban Economics64:35–48.
25.
FredrikssonPer G.WangLeMamunKhawaja A.. 2011. “Are Politicians Office or Policy Motivated? The Case of U.S. Governors' Environmental Policies.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management62:241–53.
26.
GaleJr.FredH.ForemanLindaCapehartThomas. 2000. “Tobacco and the Economy. Farms, Jobs, and Communities.”Agricultural Economic Report No. 789, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.
27.
GilliganThomas W.KrehbielKeith. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.”American Journal of Political Science33:459–90.
28.
GlaeserEdward L.1997. “Self-Imposed Term Limits.”Public Choice93:143–86.
29.
GlantzStanton A.BegayMichael E.. 1994. “Tobacco Industry Campaign Contributions are Affecting Tobacco Control Policymaking in California.”Journal of the American Medical Association272:1176–82.
30.
GoldsteinA. O.BearmanN. S.. 1996. “State Tobacco Lobbyists and Organizations in the United States: Crossed Lines.”American Journal of Public Health86:1137–42.
31.
GrossmanGene M.HelpmanElhanan. 1994. “Protection for Sale.”American Economic Review84:833–50.
32.
JacobsonPeter D.WassermanJeffreyAndersonJon R.. 1997. “Historical Overview of Tobacco Legislation and Regulation.”Journal of Social Issues53:75–95.
33.
KeenMichael J.1998. “Vertical Tax Externalities in the Theory of Fiscal Federalism.”IMF Staff Papers45:454–85.
34.
KleibergenFrankPaapRichard. 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Tests using the Singular Value Decomposition.”Journal of Econometrics133:97–126.
35.
KrosznerRandall S.StratmannThomas. 1998. “Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services’ Political Action Committees.”American Economic Review88:1163–87.
36.
LeeKangoh. 2002. “An Analysis of Welfare Effects of Legislative Term Limits.”Public Choice110:245–60.
37.
ListJohn A.SturmDaniel M.. 2006. “How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environmental Policy.”Quarterly Journal of Economics121:1249–81.
38.
LopezRigoberto A.2001. “Campaign Contributions and Agricultural Subsidies.”Economics & Politics13:257–79.
39.
LopezRigoberto A.MatschkeXenia. 2006. “Food Protection for Sale.”Review of International Economics14:380–91.
40.
LopezRigoberto A.PagoulatosEmilio. 1996. “Trade Protection and the Role of Campaign Contributions in U.S. Food and Tobacco Industries.”Economic Inquiry34:237–48.
41.
LukeDouglas A.KraussMelissa. 2002. “Where There’s Smoke There’s Money: Tobacco Industry Campaign Contributions and U.S. Congressional Voting.”American Journal of Preventive Medicine27:363–72.
42.
MillimetDaniel L.SturmDaniel M.ListJohn A.. 2004. “The Economic Consequences of Electoral Accountability Revisited.”Working Paper, Southern Methodist University, Dallas,TX.
43.
MorleyC. P.CummingsK. M.HylandA.GiovinoG. A.HoranJ. K.. (2002). “Tobacco Institute Lobbying at the State and Local Levels of Government in the 1990s.”Tobacco Control11:102–109.
44.
MoultonBrent R.1986. “Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates.”Journal of Econometrics32:385–97.
45.
National Governors Association. 2005. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://www.nga.org.
46.
OrzechowskiWilliamWalkerRobert C.. 2003. Tax Burden on Tobacco: The Historical Compilation, Vol. 38. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski and Walker.
47.
PoterbaJames M.1994. “State Responses to Fiscal Crises: The Effects of Budgetary Institutions and Politics.”Journal of Political Economy102:799–821.
48.
PottersJanSloofRandolph. 1996. “Interest Groups: A Survey of Empirical Models that Try to Assess their Influence.”European Journal of Political Economy12:403–42.
49.
ReedW. Robert. 2006. “Democrats, Republicans, and Taxes: Evidence that Political Parties Matter.”Journal of Public Economics90:725–50.
50.
RogersW. H.. 1993. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.”Stata Technical Bulletin13:19–23.
SalmonPierre. 1987. “Decentralization as an Incentive Scheme.”Oxford Review of Economic Policy3:24–43.
53.
StaigerDouglasStockJames H.. 1997. “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.”Econometrica65:557–86.
54.
StockJames H.WrightJonathan H.. 2000. “GMM with Weak Identification.”Econometrica68:1055–96.
55.
StockJames H.WrightJonathan H.YogoMotohiro. 2002. “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics20:518–29.
56.
StockJames H.YogoMotohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by AndrewsDonald W. K.StockJames H., 80–108. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
57.
UriNoel D.BoydRoy. 1997. “The Effects of Increasing the Tobacco Excise Tax on the U.S. Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Health & Social Policy8: –23.
58.
US Census Bureau. Various years. Statistical Abstract of the United States, various editions, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
59.
USDA (US Department of Agriculture). Various years. Historical Data. National Agriculture Statistics Service. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://www.usda.gov/.
60.
US Department of Commerce. Various years. Regional Economic Accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://www.bea.gov/regional/index.htm/.
61.
US Department of Energy. Various years. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://www.eia.doe.gov/.
62.
US Department of Labor. Various years. Local area unemployment statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Accessed March 3, 2009. http://www.bls.gov/lau/home.htm.
63.
WhiteHalbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity–Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.”Econometrica48:817–38.
64.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
