The authors characterize equilibria of an income reporting game with bounded returns and no commitment where detected tax evaders are charged the maximally feasible amount. Introducing partial commitment to punishment relief eliminates multiplicity of equilibria. The authors identify a unique limit equilibrium where the poorest citizens evade, intermediate citizens are honest, and the richest citizens are indifferent between evading and truth telling. For small tax rates and auditing cost, committing to a discretionary punishment relief scheme increases expected tax revenue.
Alm, James, and Michael McKee .2004. Tax compliance as a coordination game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization54:297-312.
2.
Becker, Gary S.1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76:169-217.
3.
Boadway, R., and W. Richter.2005. Trading off tax distortion and tax evasion . Journal of Public Economic Theory8:361-81.
4.
Borck, R.2004. Income tax evasion and the penalty structure. Economic Bulletin8:1.9.
5.
Dhami, S., and A. al-Nowaihi.2006. Hang’ em with probability zero: Why does it not work? Working paper, University of Leicester .
6.
Dittmann, I.2006. The optimal use of fines and imprisonment if governments do not maximize welfare. Journal of Public Economic Theory8:677-95.
7.
Kolm, S.-C.1973. A note on optimum tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics2:265-70.
8.
Landsberger, M., D. Monderer, and I. Talmore.2000. Feasible net income distributions under income tax evasion: An equilibrium analysis. Journal of Public Economic Theory2:135-53.
9.
Polinsky, A.M., and S. Shavell.2000. The economic theory of public enforcement of law. Journal of Economic Literature38:45-76.
10.
Pyne, D.2004. Can making it harder to convict criminals ever reduce crime? European Journal of Law and Economics18:191-201.
11.
Reinganum, Jennifer, and Louis L. Wilde .1986. Equilibrium verification and reporting policies in a model of tax compliance. International Economic Review27:739-60.