Some Georgia school systems award more HOPE scholarships than their academic achievement predicts, creating a geographically determined benefit that will be compounded into local real estate values. Using a two-stage regression methodology, we test to see if these scholarship ``over-awards'' are capitalized into local home prices. Our evidence supports the hypothesis. We argue that potential homeowners view HOPE eligibility percentages as an indicator of access to state resources, and this access is capitalized into home prices.
Boatwright, Susan R., and Douglas C. Bachtel .Various editions. The Georgia County Guide . Athens, GA: Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development .
2.
Becker, Gary.1983. A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics98 (3): 371-400.
3.
Brasington, David M., and Donald R. Haurin .2006. Educational outcomes and house values: A test of the value added approach. Journal of Regional Studies46 (2): 245-67.
4.
Brasington, David M.2002. The demand for local public goods: The case of public school quality. Public Finance Review30 (3): 163-88.
5.
Brasington, David M.1999. Which measures of school quality does the housing market value? The Journal of Real Estate Research18 (3): 395-414.
6.
Bradbury, John Charles, and Noel D. Campbell .2003. Local lobbying for state grants: Evidence from Georgia's HOPE scholarship. Public Finance Review31 (4): 367-91.
7.
Campbell, Noel D., and R. Zachary Finney .2005. Mitigating the combined distributional consequences of the Georgia Lottery for Education and the HOPE Scholarship . Social Sciences Quarterly86 (3): 746-58.
8.
Campbell, Noel D., and Kim I. Melton .2001. The fable of the ``B''s: an analysis of variation in B-averages across Georgia's school systems. BusinessQuest, 6.
9.
Cornwell, Christopher, and David Mustard.2007. Merit-based college scholarships and car sales. Education Finance and Policy2 (2): 133-51.
10.
Cornwell, Christopher, David Mustard, and Deepa Sridhar.2006. The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia's HOPE scholarship. Journal of Labor Economics24 (4): 761-86.
11.
Cornwell, Christopher, Kyung Hee Lee, and David Mustard.2005. Student responses to merit scholarship retention rules. Journal of Human Resources40 (4): 895-917.
12.
Dee, Thomas S.2000. The capitalization of education finance reforms . Journal of Law and Economics43 (1): 185-215.
13.
Dee, Thomas S.1998. Tiebout goes to college: Evidence from the HOPE scholarship program. Georgia Institute of Technology Working Paper , Atlanta, GA.
14.
Georgia Public Education Report Card, Office of Educational Accountability, Georgia Department of Education. Accessed May 12, 2007 at <http://www.ga-oea.org/report_card.html> ;.
15.
Georgia Student Finance Commission. Accessed May 12, 2007 at <http://www.gsfc.org/ main/dsp_main.cfm>.
16.
Henry, Gary T., Ross Rubenstein, and Daniel T.Bugler D.2004. Is HOPE enough? Impacts of receiving and losing merit-based financial aid. Educational Policy18 (5): 686-709.
17.
Henry, Gary. T., and Ross Rubenstein .2002. Paying for grades: impact of merit-based financial aid on educational quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21 (1): 93-109.
18.
HOPE Scholarship Joint Commission Study Report. 2004. Athens, GA: Carl Vinson Institute of Government .
19.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. Accessed May 12, 2007 at <http://www.ofheo.gov/hpi.asp>.
20.
Rubenstein, Ross, and Benjamin Scafidi .2002. Who pays and who benefits? Examining the distributional consequences of the Georgia lottery for education . National Tax Journal55 (2): 223-38.
