Big Tech on the Block: Examining the Impact of Tech Campuses on Local Housing Markets in the San Francisco Bay Area

Abstract

The rapid growth of tech company headquarters such as Apple, Facebook, and Google could potentially put new pressure on the housing market in adjacent residential neighborhoods, in the form of housing price appreciation and real estate speculation. This article examines the relationship between the big tech corporate campuses and Silicon Valley/San Francisco housing markets using the Zillow (ZTRAX) transaction and tax assessor data. The authors compare real estate activity adjacent to new company locations with activity in nearby areas, conducting a difference-in-differences analysis to estimate changes in housing prices and speculation. They find that housing prices increase overall by an additional 7.1% in the immediate vicinity of the tech campus 2 years after arrival, with wide variation across campuses. The authors also identify significant real estate speculation occurring prior to firms’ arrival. This suggests that cities should take a proactive role in mitigating tech firm impacts on vulnerable adjacent neighborhoods.

Keywords

high tech housing price appreciation housing submarkets tech campus

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartik

T. J.

Sotherland

(2019). Local job multipliers in the United States: Variation with local characteristics and with high-tech shocks (Working Paper 19-301). Upjohn Institute. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3379722

Bates

L. K.

(2006). Does neighborhood really matter? Comparing historically defined neighborhood boundaries with housing submarkets. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05283254

Bayer

Geissler

Mangum

Roberts

J. W.

(2011). Speculators and middlemen: The strategy and performance of investors in the housing market (Working Paper 16784). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Been

Ellen

I. G.

O’Regan

(2019). Supply skepticism: Housing supply and affordability. Housing Policy Debate, 29(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1476899

Bourassa

S. C.

Hamelink

Hoesli

MacGregor

B. D.

(1999). Defining housing submarkets. Journal of Housing Economics, 8(2), 160-183. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhec.1999.0246

Campbell

J. Y.

Giglio

Pathak

(2011). Forced sales and house prices. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2108-2131. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.2108

Cao

Lou

(2018). When and how much did the Green Line LRT increase single-family housing values in St. Paul, Minnesota? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(4), 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17707811

Cervero

(1996). Jobs-housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975714

Cervero

K.-L.

(1997). Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 29(5), 865-886. https://doi.org/10.1068/a290865

10.

Chapple

(2009). Mapping susceptibility to gentrification: The early warning toolkit. Center for Community Innovation.

11.

Chapple

Loukaitou-Sideris

(2019). Transit-oriented displacement or community dividends: Understanding the effects of smarter growth on communities. MIT Press.

12.

Chapple

Thomas

J. V.

Belzer

Autler

(2004). Fueling the fire: Information technology and housing price appreciation in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Twin Cities. Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 347-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2004.9521505

13.

Chapple

Waddell

Chatman

Zuk

Loukaitou-Sideris

Ong

Gorska

Pech

Gonzalez

S. R.

(2017). Developing a new methodology for analyzing potential displacement. California Air Resources Board.

14.

Chen

Wilkoff

Yoshida

(2021). Amazon is coming to town: Private information and housing market efficiency. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3762672

15.

Diao

Leonard

Sing

T. F.

(2017). Spatial-difference-in-differences models for impact of new mass rapid transit line on private housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 67, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.08.006

16.

Ellen

Schill

Susin

Schwartz

(2001). Building homes, reviving neighborhoods: Spillovers from subsidized construction of owner-occupied housing in New York City. Journal of Housing Research, 12(2), 185-216.

17.

Feagin

(1998). The New urban paradigm. Critical perspectives on the city. Rowman & Littlefield.

18.

Fischel

W. A.

(1987). The economics of zoning laws: A property rights approach to American land use controls. Johns Hopkins University Press.

19.

Florida

(2017). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class-and what we can do about it. Basic Books.

20.

Foti

Waddell

Luxen

(2012). A generalized computational framework for accessibility: From the pedestrian to the metropolitan scale. In Proceedings of the 4th TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling. Transportation Research Board.

21.

Garcia

(2019). Making it pencil: The math behind housing development. Terner Center for Housing Innovation. https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/making-it-pencil/

22.

Gindelsky

Moulton

Wentland

S. A.

(2019). Valuing housing services in the era of big data: A user cost approach leveraging Zillow microdata. In Abraham

Jarmin

Moyer

Shapiro

M. D.

(Eds.), Big data for 21st century economic statistics. University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/big-data-twenty-first-century-economic-statistics/valuing-housing-services-era-big-data-user-cost-approach-leveraging-zillow-microdata

23.

Glaeser

E. L.

(2013). A nation of gamblers: Real estate speculation and American history. American Economic Review, 103(3), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.1

24.

Glaeser

E. L.

Gottlieb

J. D.

(2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983-1028. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14806

25.

Glaeser

E. L.

Kolko

Saiz

(2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(3), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.27

26.

Gottlieb

P. D.

(1995). Residential amenities, firm location and economic development. Urban Studies, 32(9), 1413-1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989550012320

27.

Graham

Makridis

(2020). House prices and consumption: A new instrumental variables approach. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285263

28.

Grigsby

Baratz

Galster

Maclennan

(1987). The dynamics of neighborhood change and decline. Progress in Planning, 28(1), 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(87)90011-0

29.

Guntermann

K. L.

Horenstein

A. R.

Liu

C. H.

Nowak

A. D.

(2011). Do investors flip over housing? (Working Paper 2010-008). Center for Real Estate and Finance, Cornell University.

30.

Gupta

P. S.

(2019). The fleeting, unhappy affair of Amazon HQ2 and New York City. Transnational Legal Theory, 10(1), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2019.1609785

31.

Hartman-Glaser

Thibodeau

Yoshida

(2018). Cash to spend: IPO wealth and house prices. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3329651

32.

Karlsson

(2007). Modern industrial structure and development of house price spatial disparity: A general case for Iceland-a large but thinly populated European country. Bifröst Journal of Social Science, 1, 96-116.

33.

Kemeny

Osman

(2018). The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from US cities. Research Policy, 47(9), 1729-1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.005

34.

Landis

J. D.

(1992). Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975831

35.

Landis

J. D.

Deng

(2001). Estimating fair share housing production in California: An assessment of the 1990s and projections for the new millennium [Unpublished manuscript].

36.

Lee

C. C.

Liang

C. M.

Chen

C. Y.

(2017). The impact of urban renewal on neighborhood housing prices in Taipei: An application of the difference-in-difference method. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(3), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9518-1

37.

Lee

C. C.

Liang

C. M.

Hong

H. C.

(2020). The impact of mass rapid transit system on neighborhood housing prices: An application of difference-in-difference and spatial econometrics. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 28(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2020-0003

38.

Liang

C. M.

Lee

C. C.

Lin

Y. H.

Yeh

W. C.

(2020). The impact of luxury housing on neighborhood housing prices: An application of the spatial difference-in-differences method. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(6), 456-473. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2020.13649

39.

Lin

Wachter

(2020). Local land use regulation and housing prices: How relative restrictiveness and income matter. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3363947

40.

Lin

Rosenblatt

Yao

V. W.

(2009). Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(4), 387-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9093-z

41.

Madrigal

A. C.

(2019, April 19). Who’s really buying property in San Francisco? A lot of software developers, according to an unprecedented new analysis. Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/04/san-francisco-city-apps-built-or-destroyed/587389/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

42.

Malpezzi

(2002). Urban regulation, the “new economy,” and housing prices. Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 323-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2002.9521445

43.

Malpezzi

Wachter

(2005). The role of speculation in real estate cycles. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2005.12090156

44.

Moretti

(2012). The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

45.

Nelson

K. P.

(2002). Housing needs and effective policies in high-tech metropolitan economies. Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 417-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2002.9521449

46.

Oates

W. E.

(1973). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: A reply and yet further results. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 1004-1008. https://doi.org/10.1086/260095

47.

Perry

C. A.

(1929). The neighborhood unit: A scheme of arrangement for the family-life community regional plan of New York and its environs. In Monograph one, neighborhood and community planning, regional plan of New York and its environs (pp. 2-140). Committee on Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.

48.

Persky

Felsenstein

Carlson

(2004). Does “trickle down” work? Economic development strategies and job chains in local labor markets. Upjohn Institute.

49.

Quercia

R. G.

Stegman

M. A.

Davis

W. R.

(2002). Does a high-tech boom worsen housing problems for working families? Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 393-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2002.9521448

50.

Quigley

J. M.

Raphael

Rosenthal

L. A.

(2008). Measuring land-use regulations and their effects in the housing market (Working paper). Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy.

51.

Rodríguez-Pose

Storper

(2019). Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Studies, 57(2), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019859458

52.

Saiz

(2010). The geographic determinants of housing supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1253-1296. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1253

53.

Saxenian

(2007). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press.

54.

Storper

(2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interactions, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press.

55.

Sharma

(2012). Housing submarket classification: The role of spatial contiguity. Applied Geography, 32(2), 746-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.011

56.

Yin

R. K.

(1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

57.

Zhang

Wang

(2018). The impact of structural adjustment on housing prices in China. Journal of Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 32(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12221

58.

Zhong

Zhao

Zou

Mason

R. J.

(2018). University campuses and housing markets: Evidence from Nanjing. Professional Geographer, 70(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1325750

59.

Zuk

Chapple

(2016). Housing production, filtering and displacement: Untangling the relationships. Institute of Governmental Studies.