In the authors' political equilibrium model, regulation is considered an implicit and regressive tax-equivalent alternative to the common and less regressive fiscal alternatives: income, property, and sales taxes. The authors hypothesize that in more heterogeneous jurisdictions the state relies more on regulation and less on budgetary spending than in more homogeneous units. Using data drawn from U.S. state-level environmental policy from 1980 to 1994, the authors confirm this hypothesis.
Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly. 1999. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics114 (4): 1243-1284.
2.
Bator, Francis M.1960. The question of government spending: Public needs and private wants. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
Bauer, Peter T.1972. Dissent on development. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
4.
Bauer, Peter T.1984. Reality and rhetoric: Studies in the economics of development. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
5.
Becker, Gary, and Casey Mulligan. 2003. Deadweight costs and the size of government. Journal of Law and Economics47:293-328.
6.
Borcherding, Thomas E.1977. An economic approach to school integration: Public choice with tie-ins. Public Choice31 (1): 53-77.
7.
Borcherding, Thomas E.1985. The causes of government expenditure growth: A survey of the U.S. evidence. Journal of Public Economics28:359-382.
8.
Borcherding, Thomas E., and Robert Deacon. 1972. The demand for services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review62:891-901.
9.
Borcherding, Thomas E., Stephen Ferris, and Andrea Garzoni. 2004. The growth of real government. In Handbook of public choice, ed. Jurgen G. Backhaus and Richard E. Wagner, 77-108. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
10.
Borcherding, Thomas E., and Dong (Dan) Lee. 2004. The growth of the relative size of government. In Encyclopedia of public choice, ed. Charles K.Rowley and Friedrich F.Schneider, 273-278. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
11.
Borcherding, Thomas E., Werner W. Pommerehne, and Friedrich F. Schneider. 1983. Comparing the efficiency of private and public production: The evidence from five countries. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie2 (suppl.): 127-156.
12.
Boyce, James K., Andrew R. Klemer, Paul H.Templet, and Cleve E.Willis. 1999. Power distribution, the environment, and public health: A state level analysis. Ecological Economics11:127-140.
13.
Brennan, Geoffrey. 2002. Public finance, public choice, and the political economy of regulation. In Political economy and public finance, ed. Stanley L. Winer and Hirofumi Shibata, 13-30. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
14.
Brown, Phil. 1995. Race, class, and environmental health: A review and systematization of the literature. Environmental Research69:15-30.
15.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alistair Smith, Randolph M.Siverson, and James D.Morrow. 2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Bullard, Robert D., and Beverly H.Wright. 1993. Environmental justice for all: Community perspectives on health and research needs. Toxicology and Industrial Health9:821-841.
17.
Clark, Colin. 1945. Public finance and changes in the value of money. Economic Journal55:371-389.
18.
Crain, Mark W., and Thomas D. Hopkins. 2001. The impact of regulatory costs on small firms. Report for the Office of Advocacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration.
19.
de Soto, Hernando. 1989. The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
de Soto, Hernando. 2000. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Dinan, Terry M., and Diane L. Rogers. 2002. Distributional effects of carbon allowance trading: How government decisions determine winners and losers. National Tax Journal55:199-222.
22.
Dixit, Avinish K.1996. The making of economic policy: A transaction-cost politics perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Friedman, Milton. 2004. The battle's half won. Wall Street Journal, December 9.
25.
Hettich, Walter, and Stanley L. Winer. 1988. Economic and political foundations of tax structure. American Economic Review78:701-712.
26.
Hettich, Walter, and Stanley L. Winer. 1999. Democratic choice and taxation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hettich, Walter, and Stanley L. Winer. 2003. Taxation and regulation: Analyzing policy interdependence. Carleton University Working Paper, Carleton, Canada.
28.
Hirschman, Albert O.1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Holsey, Cheryl M., and Thomas E. Borcherding. 1997. Why does government's share of national income grow?An assessment of the recent literature on the U.S. experience. In Perspectives on public choice: A handbook, ed. Dennis Mueller, 562-589. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Hopkins, Thomas D.1995. Profiles of regulatory costs. Report to the U.S. Small Business Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration.
31.
Hopkins, Thomas D.1998. Regulatory costs in profile. Policy Sciences31 (4): 301-320.
32.
Kahn, Matthew E., and John G. Matsusaka. 1997. Demand for environmental goods: Evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. Journal of Law and Economics40: 137-168.
33.
Kelman, Mark. 1999. Strategy or principle? The choice between regulation and taxation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
Lal, Deepak K.1993. The repressed economy. London: Edward Elgar.
35.
Lal, Deepak K.1998. Unintended consequences: The impact of factor endowments, culture and politics on long run economic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Leonard, Herman B.1986. Checks unbalanced: The quiet side of public spending. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Levinson, Arik. 1996. Environmental regulations and manufacturers' location choices: Evidence from the census of manufactures. Journal of Public Economics62:5-29.
38.
Levinson, Arik. 2001. An industry-adjusted index of state environmental compliance costs. In Behavioral and distributional effects of environmental policy, ed. Gilbert Metcalf and Carlo Carrero. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Magnani, Elisabetta. 2000. The environmental Kuznets curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics32:431-443.
40.
Matsusaka, John. 1995. Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy103:587-623.
41.
Mauro, Paolo. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics110:681-712.
42.
Morrison, Todd A.1984. Economies of scale in regulatory compliance: Evidence of the differential impacts of regulation by firm size. Report to U.S. Small Business Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration.
43.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American dilemma: The Negro problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
44.
Nieves, Leslie A., and Dee R. Wernette. 1996. Assessment of relative exposure of minority and low-income groups to outdoor air pollution. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
45.
Office of Management and Budget. 1997. Report to Congress on the costs and benefits of federal regulations. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
46.
Parry, Ian. 2004. Are emissions permits regressive?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management47:364-387.
47.
Pashigian, Peter. 1984. The effect of environmental regulation on optimal plant size and factor shares. Journal of Law and Economics27:1-28.
48.
Posner, Richard A.1971. Taxation by regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2:22-50.
49.
Rabushka, Alvin. 1974. The theory of racial harmony. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
50.
Rabushka, Alvin, and Kenneth Shepsle. 1974. Politics in plural societies: A theory of democratic instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
51.
Rucker, Randal, and Walter N. Thurman. 1990. The economic effects of supply controls: The simple analytics of the U.S. peanut program. Journal of Law and Economics33:483-515.
52.
Sexton, Ken, and John L. Adgate. 1999. Looking at environmental justice from an environmental health perspective. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology9:3-8.
53.
Sexton, Ken, Henry Gong, John C. Bailar, Jean G. Ford, Diane R. Gold, William E. Lambert, and Mark J. Utell. 1993. Air pollution health risks: Do class and race matter?Toxicology and Industrial Health9:843-878.
54.
Stigler, George J.1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2 (1): 3-21.
55.
Tanzi, Vito, and Ludger Schuknecht. 2000. Public spending in the 20th century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Tuerck, David G.1967. Constitutional asymmetry. Papers on Non-Market Decision Making2:27-44.
57.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. State and county QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd (accessed October 2003).
58.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1995. Regulatory reform: Information on costs, cost effectiveness, and mandated deadlines for regulation. Washingtion, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
59.
U.S. Office of Advocacy. 1995. Report to Congress: The changing burden of regulation, paperwork, and tax compliance on small business. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Counsel for Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration.
Warren, Melinda. 2000. Federal regulatory spending reaches a new height: An analysis of the budget of the U.S. government for the year 2001. St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University.
