The financial condition of state and local governments has long been held as a prominent topic of discussion among government administrators, public economists, and political scholars. This article addresses the competing hypotheses of revenue diversification and revenue complexity and offers an empirical analysis of the various factors that affect state tax revenue diversification. The findings suggest that although political and demographic factors influence the level of state tax revenue diversification, economic factors and whether a state utilizes an income or sales tax to generate revenue represent the greatest determinants of state tax structures. As a result, this article serves as a foundation to initiate the development of a comprehensive theory of the determinants of state tax structures.
Alm, James, and Mark Skidmore. 1999. Why do tax and expenditure limitations pass in state elections?Public Finance Review27 (5): 481-510.
2.
Baker, Samuel H.1983. The determinants of median voter tax liability: An empirical test of the fiscal illusion hypothesis. Public Finance Quarterly11:95-108.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series crosssection data. American Political Science Review89 (3): 634-647.
4.
Berne, Robert, and Richard Schramm. 1986. The financial analysis of governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Berry, William, Evan Ringquist, Richard Fording, and Russell Hanson. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science42:327-348.
6.
Bowman, John H.1987. Recent changes in property taxation and their implications for balance in state and local revenue systems. In The quest for balance in state-local revenue structures, ed. Frederick D. Stocker, 71-105. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Tax Policy Roundtable, Property Tax Papers Series TPR-16. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
7.
Buchanan, James M.1949. The pure theory of government finance: Asuggested approach. Journal of Political Economy57 (6): 496-505.
8.
Da Empoli, Domenico. 2002. The theory of fiscal illusion in a constitutional perspective. Public Finance Review30 (5): 377-384.
9.
Dye, Richard F., and Therese J. McGuire. 1997. The effect of property tax limitation measures on local government fiscal behavior. Journal of Public Economics66 (3): 469-487.
10.
Eger, Robert J., III, Deborah A. Knudson, and Justin Marlowe. 2003. Managing local intergovernmental revenues: The imperative of diversification. International Journal of Public Administration26 (13): 1495-1519.
11.
Fox, William F.1995. Social statistics. Bellevue, WA: MicroCase Corporation.
12.
Gould, William. 2001. Between estimators. Available from StataCorpWeb site,www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xt.html.
13.
Hendrick, Rebecca. 2002. Revenue diversification: Fiscal illusion or flexible financial management. Public Budgeting & Finance22 (4): 52-72.
14.
Heyndels, Bruno, and Carine Smolders. 1994. Fiscal illusion at the local level: Empirical evidence for the Flemish municipalities. Public Choice80:325-338.
15.
Joyce, Philip G., and Daniel R. Mullins. 1991. The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review51 (3): 240-253.
16.
Koven, Steven G., and Christopher Mausolff. 2002. The influence of political culture on state budgets: Another look at Elazar's formulation. American Reviewof Public Administration32 (1): 66-77.
17.
Ladd, Helen F., and Dana R. Weist. 1987. State and local tax systems: Balance among taxes vs. balance among policy goals. In The quest for balance in state-local revenue structures, ed. Frederick D. Stocker, 39-69. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Tax Policy Roundtable, Property Tax Papers Series TPR-16. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
18.
Little, Daniel. 1991. Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Markowitz, Harry. 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance7 (1): 77-91.
20.
Misiolek, Walter S., and Harold W. Elder. 1988. Tax structure and the size of government: An empirical analysis of the fiscal illusion and fiscal stress arguments. Public Choice57 (3): 233-245.
21.
Niskanen, William A.1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.
22.
Oates, Wallace E.1991. On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: Asurvey. In Studies in fiscal federalism. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
23.
Piper, Bill. 2004. Abrief analysis of voter behavior regarding tax initiatives. Initiative and Referendum Institute, http://www.iandrinstitute.com/Studies.htm.
24.
Puviani, Amilcare. 1903/1973. Teoria della Illusions Finanziaria. Milano, Italy: Isedi.
25.
Ring, Raymond J.1992. Is South Dakota's state revenue system “balanced and moderate”?South Dakota Business Review50 (5): 1-1.
26.
Schokkaert, Erik. 1987. Preferences and demand for local public spending. Journal of Public Economics34:175-188.
27.
Shannon, John. 1987. State revenue diversification—The search for balance. In The quest for balance in state-local revenue structures, ed. Frederick D. Stocker, 9-37. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Tax Policy Roundtable, Property Tax Papers Series TPR-16. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
28.
Suyderhoud, Jack P.1994. State-local revenue diversification, balance, and fiscal performance. Public Finance Quarterly22 (2): 168-195.
29.
Treadway, Jack M.1985. Public policymaking in the American states. New York: Praeger.
30.
Turnbull, GeoffreyK. 1998. The overspending and flypaper effects of fiscal illusion: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Urban Economics44:1-26.
31.
Ulbrich, Holley H.1991. Nonproperty taxes. In Local government finance, ed. John E. Petersen and Dennis R. Strachota, 113-133. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
32.
Wagner, Richard E.1976. Revenue structure, fiscal illusion and budgetary choice. Public Choice25:45-61.
33.
White, Fred C.1983. Trade-off in growth and stability in state taxes. National Tax Journal36 (1): 103-114.
34.
Zorn, C. Kurt. 1991. User charges and fees. In Local government finance, ed. John E. Petersen and Dennis R. Strachota, 135-151. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
