This study uses a panel of sixty-four countries to test empirically various hypotheses about the causes of decentralization at the government level and in different functional spending areas. The empirical results find a negative impact of urbanization on decentralization. In the general case, a higher income per capita favors decentralization, with this effect being stronger for high-income countries. However, the use of functional measurements of decentralization shows that income per capita has a negative effect on health decentralization. Urbanization has a negative impact on the fiscal decentralization of health and education, and it has a positive effect on the share of housing expenditures being made by subnational governments.
Bahl, Roy W.1999. Implementation rules for fiscal decentralization. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Accessed from www.worldbank.org/decentralization
2.
Bahl, Roy W., and S. Nath. 1986. Public expenditure decentralization in developing countries. Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy4 (4): 405-418.
3.
Baumol, William J.1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review57 (2): 415-426.
4.
Buchanan, James. 1950. An economic theory of clubs. Economica32 (125): 1-14.
5.
Davoodi, Hamid, and Heng-fu Zou. 1998. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics43 (2): 244-257.
6.
Ebel, Robert D., and Serdar Yilmaz. 2003. On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. In Public finance in developing countries: Essays in the honor of Richard M. Bird, edited by James Alm and Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 101-120. Northhampton, MA: Elgar.
7.
For 80 cents more. 2002. The Economist, August 17, 20-22.
8.
Gordon, Robert. 1983. An optimal taxation approach to fiscal federalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics95 (4): 567-586.
9.
Huther, J., and Anwar Shah. 1998. Applying a simple measure of good governance in the debate on fiscal decentralization. Working Paper No. 1894, World Bank, Washington, DC.
10.
Kee, W.1977. Fiscal decentralization and economic development. Public Finance Quarterly5 (1): 79-97.
11.
Letelier, S. L. 2001. Effect of fiscal decentralisation on the efficiency of the public sector: The cases of education and health. Paper presented at the IIPF Conference on Public Finance, August, Linz, Austria.
12.
Letelier, S. L. 2002. Four essays on fiscal decentralization. Ph.D. diss., University of Sussex.
13.
Letelier, S. L.2004. Fiscal decentralization as a mechanism to modernize the state. Journal of Institutional Comparisons2 (1): 15-20.
14.
Litvack, Jennifer, and Wallace Oates. 1971. Group size and the output of public goods: Theory and application to state-local finance in the United States. Public Finance25 (2): 42-58.
15.
Marlow, M.1988. Fiscal decentralization and government size. Public Choice56 (3): 259-269.
16.
Miyazaki, T., T. Zhang, and Heng-fu Zou. 1998. Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. Journal of Public Economics67 (2): 221-240.
17.
Oates, Wallace. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
18.
Oates, Wallace. 1985. Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review75 (4): 748-757.
19.
Panizza, U.1999. On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics74 (1): 97-139.
20.
Patsouratis, V.1990. Fiscal decentralization in the EEC countries. Public Finance45(3):423-439.
21.
Pommerehne, Werner. 1977. Quantitative aspects of federalism: A study of six countries. In The political economy of fiscal federalism, edited by Wallace Oates, 275-355. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
22.
Pryor, F.1967. Elements of a positive theory of public expenditures. Finanzarchiv26(3):405-430.
23.
Reilly, B., and R. Witt. 1996. Crime, deterrence and unemployment in England and Wales: An empirical analysis. Bulletin of Economic Research48 (2): 137-159.
24.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1980. Risk taking and reelection: Does federalism promote innovation?Journal of Legal Studies9 (3): 593-616.
25.
Sachs, J., and A. Warner. 1997. Fundamental sources of long-run growth. American Economic Review87 (2): 184-188.
26.
Seabright, P.1995. Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review40 (1): 61-89.
27.
Tiebout, Charles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-424.
28.
Tirole, Jean. 1994. The internal organization of government. Oxford Economic Papers46 (1): 1-29.
29.
United Nations. 1997. United Nations statistical yearbook. New York: United Nations.
30.
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. 1997. The world factbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.
31.
Von Hayek, F.1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review35 (4): 519-530.
32.
Wallis, J., and Wallace Oates. 1988. Decentralization in the public sector: An empirical study of state and local government. In Fiscal federalism: Quantitative studies, edited by Harvey S. Rosen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Wasylenko, Michael. 1987. Fiscal decentralization and economic development. Public Budgeting and Finance7 (4): 57-71.
34.
Wheare, K. C.1964. Federal government. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Woller, G., and K. Phillips. 1998. Fiscal decentralisation and the LDCs economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Studies34 (4): 139-148.
36.
World Bank. 1999. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
