In most Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, unemployment benefits are tied to previous labor earnings. The authors study the progressivity of this indexation with regard to its effects on employment, output, and wages in three non-Walrasian equilibrium models of the labor market. In the cases of decentralized union wage bargaining and search unemployment and Nash wage bargaining, employment, output, and wages increase with the degree of indexation. The indexation of unemployment benefits to previous earnings, however, has no effect in the case of efficiency wages. The results also suggest that a more progressive indexation of unemployment benefits is welfare enhancing if wages are bargained.
Acemoglu, Daron. 2001. Good jobs versus bad jobs: Theory and some evidence. Journal of Labor Economics19 (1): 1-21.
2.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robert Shimer. 1999. Efficient unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy107 (5): 893-928.
3.
Atkinson, Anthony B., and John Micklewright. 1991. Unemployment compensation and labor market transition: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature29 (4): 1679-1727.
4.
Blanchard, Oliver J., and Peter A. Diamond. 1989. The Beveridge Curve. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1:1-76.
5.
Burdett, Kenneth. 1979. Unemployment insurance payments as a search subsidy: A theoretical analysis. Economic Inquiry17 (3): 333-343.
6.
Cahuc, Pierre, and Etienne Lehmann. 2000. Should unemployment benefits decrease with unemployment spell?Journal of Public Economics77 (1): 135-153.
7.
Carruth, Alan A., and Andrew J. Oswald. 1985. Miners’ wages in post-war Britain: An application of a model of trade union behavior. Economic Journal95:1003-1020.
8.
Costain, Jim S.1997. Unemployment insurance with endogenous search intensity and precautionary saving. Economics Working Paper No. 243, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
9.
Fredriksson, Peter, and Bertil Holmlund. 2001. Optimal unemployment insurance in search equilibrium. Journal of Labor Economics19 (2): 370-399.
10.
Goerke, Laszlo, and Jakob B. Madsen. 2003. Earnings-related unemployment benefits and unemployment in unionized economies. Economic Systems27 (1): 41-62.
11.
Hansen, Gary, and Ayse İmrohoroğlu. 1992. The role of unemployment insurance in an economy with liquidity constraints and moral hazard. Journal of Political Economy100 (1):118-142.
12.
Heer, Burkhard. 2002. The German unemployment compensation system: Effects on aggregate savings and wealth distribution. Review of Income and Wealth48 (3): 371-394.
13.
Heer, Burkhard. 2003. Employment and welfare effects of a two-tier unemployment compensation system. International Tax and Public Finance10 (2): 147-168.
14.
Hosios, Arthur J.1990. On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies57 (2): 279-298.
15.
Ljungqvist, Lars, and Thomas J. Sargent. 1998. The European unemployment dilemma. Journal of Political Economy106 (3): 514-550.
16.
Marimon, Ramon, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 1999. Unemployment vs. mismatch of talents: Reconsidering unemployment benefits. Economic Journal109 (455): 266-291.
17.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1991. Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.
18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1996. Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.
19.
Pissarides, Christopher A.1986. Unemployment and vacancies in Britain. Economic Policy3 (3): 499-540.
20.
Pissarides, Christopher A.1990. Equilibrium unemployment theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21.
Pissarides, Christopher A.1998. The impact of employment tax cuts on unemployment and wages: The role of unemployment benefits and tax structure. European Economic Review42 (1): 155-183.
22.
Pissarides, Christopher A.2000. Equilibrium unemployment theory. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Shapiro, Carl, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1984. Unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review74 (3): 433-444.
24.
Wang, Cheng, and Stephen D. Williamson. 1996. Unemployment insurance with moral hazard in a dynamic economy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy44:1-41.
