The authors study the responses to the withdrawal of two generous unemployment benefit (UB) schemes introduced in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting variations across states in the timing of the policy change. Using data from the Current Population Survey, they find that the expiration of UBs increased unemployment-to-employment transitions. However, approximately half of this effect was driven by job recalls. Evidence also shows that unemployed individuals transitioned into lower quality jobs, compared to their previous occupations, and that young job seekers not eligible for UBs were displaced by increased job-search competition. Using both survey and transaction data, the authors also provide complementary evidence on the consumption effects of the policy change. They document a small reduction in consumption after the withdrawal of pandemic UBs for some non-necessary spending categories.
ArbogastIrisDuporBill. 2022. Increasing employment by halting pandemic unemployment benefits. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review104(3):166–77.
3.
AutorDavidDornDavid. 2009. This job is “getting old”: Measuring changes in job opportunities using occupational age structure. American Economic Review99(2):45–51. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.45. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.99.2.45
4.
BachasNatalieGanongPeterNoelPascal J.VavraJoseph S.WongArleneFarrellDianaGreigFiona E.2020. Initial impacts of the pandemic on consumer behavior: Evidence from linked income, spending, and savings data. NBER Working Paper No. 27617, July. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27617
BoarCorinaMongeySimon. 2020. Dynamic trade-offs and labor supply under the CARES Act. NBER Working Paper No. 27727, August. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27727
CoombsKyleDubeArindrajitJahnkeCalvinKluenderRaymondNaiduSureshStepnerMichael. 2022. Early withdrawal of pandemic unemployment insurance: Effects on employment and earnings. AEA Papers and Proceedings112:85–90.
FarberHenry S.RothsteinJesseVallettaRobert G.2015. The effect of extended unemployment insurance benefits: Evidence from the 2012–2013 phase-out. American Economic Review105(5):171–76. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20151088. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.p20151088
12.
GanongPeterGreigFionaNoelPascalSullivanDaniel M.VavraJoseph. 2024. Spending and job-finding impacts of expanded unemployment benefits: Evidence from administrative micro data. American Economic Review114(9):2898–939. doi: 10.1257/aer.20220973
13.
GanongPeterNoelPascal. 2019. Consumer spending during unemployment: Positive and normative implications. American Economic Review109(7):2383–424. doi: 10.1257/aer.20170537. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20170537
14.
GanongPeterNoelPascalVavraJoseph. 2020. US unemployment insurance replacement rates during the pandemic. Journal of Public Economics191:104273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104273.
15.
Garza CasadoMiguelGlennonBrittaLaneJuliaMcQuownDavidRichDanielWeinbergBruce A.2020. The aggregate effects of fiscal stimulus: Evidence from the COVID-19 unemployment supplement. NBER Working Paper No. 27576, August. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27576
GreigFionaSullivanDaniel M.AndersonSamanthaGanongPeterNoelPascalVavraJoseph. 2022. Lessons learned from the pandemic unemployment assistance program during COVID-19. Working Paper 29595, December. JPMorgan Chase Institute.
18.
HolzerHarry J.HubbardR. GlennStrainMichael R.2024. Did pandemic unemployment benefits increase unemployment? Evidence from early state-level expirations. Economic Inquiry62(1):24–38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ecin.13180
ParolinZacharyAnanatElizabethCollyerSophieCurranMeganWimerChristopher. 2023. The effects of the monthly and lump-sum child tax credit payments on food and housing hardship. AEA Papers and Proceedings113(May):406–12. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20231088. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20231088
22.
ParolinZacharyGiupponiGiuliaLeeEmma K.CollyerSophie. 2024. Consumption responses to an unconditional child allowance in the United States. Nature Human Behaviour8:657–67. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01835-6
23.
ParolinZacharyLeeEmma K.2021. Large socio-economic, geographic and demographic disparities exist in exposure to school closures. Nature Human Behaviour5(4):522–28. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01087-.
24.
Petrosky-NadeauNicolas. 2020. Reservation benefits: Assessing job acceptance impacts of increased UI payments. Working Paper Series 2020-28, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, August. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedfwp/88541.html
25.
RugglesStevenFitchCatherine A.GoekenRonaldHackerJ. DavidNelsonMatt A.RobertsEvanSchouweilerMeganSobekMatthew. 2021. IPUMS Ancestry Full Count Data: Version 3.0 [dataset]. Technical report. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D014.V3.0
26.
SchmiederJohannesvon WachterTill. 2016. The effects of unemployment insurance benefits: New evidence and interpretation. Annual Review of Economics8:547–81.
27.
ShimerRobert. 2004. Search intensity. Working paper, April. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
