This research addresses the question of whether taxpayers were income mobile during 1979-1990. Following prior research, the authors compare ranks of individuals in the sample distribution of income across years. Extending prior research, the question is asked: Does an individual draw his income from some fixed subset of the distribution of possible incomes, implying a limited income opportunity set, or from the total distribution of incomes, implying an unlimited income opportunity set? Group income distributions within each year are analyzed using stochastic dominance. The authors find limited income mobility over 1979-1990 and that individuals face a limited income opportunity set based on their group membership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, A.1983. The measurement of economic mobility. In Social justice and public policy, 61-75. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
2.
Bishop, J., K. Chow, and J. Formby. 1991. A stochastic dominance analysis of growth, recessions and the U.S. income distribution. Southern Economic Journal57:936-946.
3.
Bishop, J., J. Formby, and W. Smith. 1993. International comparisons of welfare and poverty: Dominance orderings for ten countries. Canadian Journal of Economics26:707-726.
4.
Booth, J., and R. Smith. 1987. An examination of the small-firm effect on the basis of skewness preference. Journal of Financial Research10:77-86.
5.
Carroll, R., D. Joulfaian, and M. Rider. 1998. Income mobility: The American experience during the eighties. Office of Tax Analysis working paper.
6.
Congressional Budget Office. 1989. The distribution of benefits from a reduction in the tax rate on capital gains. Staff memorandum.
7.
Conlisk, J.1990. Monotone mobility matrices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology15:173-191.
8.
Cox, W., and R. Alm. 1995. By our own bootstraps: Economic opportunity and the dynamics of income distribution. Annual report, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, pp. 2-24.
9.
Dardanoni, V.1993. Measuring social mobility. Journal of Economic Theory61:372-394.
10.
Dasgupta, P., A. Sen, and D. Starrett. 1973. Notes on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory6(2):180-187.
11.
Formby, J., W. J. Smith, and B. Zheng. 1996. Economic growth, welfare and the measurement of social mobility. Working paper, University of Alabama.
12.
Foster, J., and A. Shorrocks. 1988. Poverty orderings. Econometrica56(1):173-177.
13.
Jean, W., and B. Helms. 1986. Stochastic dominance as a decision model. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics25(1):65-101.
14.
Levy, H., and M. Sarnat. 1985. Investment and portfolio analysis. New York: Wiley.
15.
Phillips, K.1990. The politics of rich and poor. New York: Random House.
16.
Porter, R.1978. Portfolio applications: Empirical studies. In Stochastic dominance, edited by G. A. Whitmore and M. C. Findley, 115-161. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17.
Saposnik, R.1981. Rank dominance in income distribution. Public Choice36:147-151.
18.
Saposnik, R.1983. On evaluating income distributions: Rank dominance, the Suppes-Sen grading principle of justice, and pareto optimality. Public Choice40:329-336.
19.
Sawhill, I., and M. Condon. 1992. Is U.S. income inequality really growing? Sorting out the fairness question. Policy Bite, The Urban Institute.
20.
Sen, A. [1970] 1979. Collective choice and social welfare. Reprint, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21.
Shorrocks, A.1978. The measurement of mobility. Econometrica46:1013-1024.
22.
Shorrocks, A.1983. Ranking income distributions. Economica50:3-17.
23.
Slemrod, J., ed. 1994. Tax progressivity and income inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Steuerle, E.1992. Income mobility. Tax Notes56:1369-1370.
25.
Treasury, Office of Tax Analysis. 1992a. Household income changes over time: Some basic questions and facts. Tax Notes55:1065-1074.
26.
Treasury, Office of Tax Analysis. 1992b. Household income mobility during the 1980s: A statistical assessment based on tax return data. Tax Notes (June) 56:1065-1074.
