LA VIDA—the Southwest Detroit Partnership to Prevent Intimate Violence Against Latina Women— evolved in response to community concern about the problem of intimate partner violence (IPV) and the lack of culturally competent preventive and support services for Latino women and men in southwest Detroit. Since 1997, diverse organizations have mobilized as a community-academic partnership to ensure the availability, accessibility, and utilization of IPV services. This article describes and analyzes the evolution of LA VIDA within a community-based participatory research framework using a case study approach that draws on multiple data sources including group and individual interviews and field notes. The challenges and lessons learned in addressing a complex multifaceted problem such as IPV in an ethnic minority community are highlighted in an examination of the process of mobilizing diverse organizations, conducting community diagnosis and needs assessment activities, establishing goals and objectives within a social ecological framework, and integrating evaluation during the development phase.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q15:351-377, 1988.
2.
2. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A: Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Research8:315-330, 1993.
3.
3. Wandersman A, Goodman RM, Butterfoss FD: Understanding coalitions and how they operate: An “open systems” organizational framework, in Minkler M(ed.): Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1997, pp. 261-277.
4.
4. Chavis DM: Building community capacity to prevent violence through coalitions and partnerships. J Health Care Poor Underserved6:234-245, 1995.
5.
5. Andrews AB: Developing community systems for the primary prevention of family violence. Family Comm Health16(4):1-9, 1994.
6.
6. Shaw B: Planning a coordinated community response, in Family Violence: Building a Coordinated Response. Chicago, American Medical Association, Commonwealth Fund and Maternal and Child Health Bureau, 1996.
7.
7. Wallerstein N: Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: Implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promotion6:197-205, 1992.
8.
8. Loring MT, Smith RW: Health care barriers and interventions for battered women. Public Health Reports109:328-338, 1994.
9.
9. Friedman LN: Rethinking Social Services for Battered Women. Remarks at the Commonwealth Fund Symposium titled Domestic Violence and Women’s Health: Broadening the Conversation, September 20, 1995.
10.
10. Kumpfer KL, Turner C, Hopkins R, Librett J: Leadership and team effectiveness in community coalitions for the prevention of alcohol and other drug abuse. Health Educ Research8:359-374, 1993.
11.
11. Rogers T, Howard-Pitney B, Feighery EC, Altman DG, Endres JM, Roeseler AG: Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California. Health Educ Research8:345-357, 1993.
12.
12. Myers AM, Pfeiffle P, Hinsdale K: Building a community-based consortium for AIDS patient services. Public Health Reports109:555-562, 1994.
13.
13. Clark NM, Baker EA, Chawla A, Maru M: Sustaining collaborative problem solving: Strategies from a study in six Asian countries. Health Educ Research8:385-402, 1993.
14.
14. Parker EA, Eng E, Laraia B, Ammerman A, Dodds J, Margolis L, Cross A: Coalition building for prevention. J Public Health Management Practice4(2):25-36, 1998.
15.
15. McLeroy KR, Kegler M, Steckler A, Burdine JM, Wisotzky M: Community coalitions for health promotion: Summary and further reflections. Health Educ Research8:1-11, 1993.
16.
16. Straus MA, Smith C: Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations, in Straus MA, Gilles RJ (eds.): Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1990, pp. 341-367.
17.
17. Sorenson SB: Violence against women: Examining ethnic differences and commonalities. Evaluation Review20:123-145, 1996.
18.
18. Kantor GK, Jasinski JL, Aldarondo E: Sociocultural status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families. Violence and Victims9:207-222, 1994.
19.
19. Neff JA, Holamon B, Schluter TD: Spousal violence among Anglos, Blacks, and Mexican Americans: The role of demographic variables, psychosocial predictors, and alcohol consumption. J Family Violence10(1):1-21, 1995.
20.
20. Torres S: A comparison of wife abuse between two cultures: Perceptions, attitudes, nature, and extent. Issues Mental Health Nurs12:113-131, 1991.
21.
21. Perilla J, Blakeman R, Norris FH: Culture and domestic violence: The ecology of abused Latinas. Violence and Victims9:325-339, 1994.
22.
22. Gondolf EW: Appreciating diversity among battered women, in Gondolf EW (ed.): Assessing Woman Battering in Mental Health Services. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1998, pp. 122-123.
23.
23. Sorenson SB, Telles C: Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White population. Violence and Victims6(1):3-15, 1991.
24.
24. Campbell DW, Masaki B, Torres S: Water on rock: Changing domestic violence perceptions in the African American, Asian American, and Latino communities, in Klein E, Campbell J, Soler E, Ghez M (eds.): Ending Domestic Violence: Changing Public Perceptions/Halting the Epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1997, pp. 64-87.
25.
25. Campbell JC, Campbell DW: Cultural competence in the care of abused women. J Nurs Midwifery41:457-462, 1996.
26.
26. Pinn VW, Chunko MT: The diverse faces of violence: Minority women and domestic abuse. Academic Medicine72(suppl. 1):S65-S71, 1997.
27.
27. Williams OJ, Becker RL: Domestic partner abuse treatment programs and cultural competence: The results of a national survey. Violence and Victims9:287-296, 1994.
28.
28. La Clinica de la Raza-Fruitvale Health Project, Inc., National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Community-Based Primary Prevention Programs to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence for a Safe America [Web site]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/fivpt/page11.htm
29.
29. Allen A: Mercy’s help Latino families break the cycle of violence in Atlanta. VITA Newsletter of the Institute of the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas, March, 1998, p. 1-1.
30.
30. McFarlane J, Kelly E, Rodriguez R, Fehir J: De Madres a Madres: Women building community coalitions for health. Health Care Women Int15:465-476, 1994.
31.
31. Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas, Inc.: Farmworker Women’s Leadership Network. Fact sheet, Pomona, CA, 1998.
32.
32. Southeast Michigan Census Council, Inc.: 1990 Census Subcommunity Profiles for the City of Detroit. Michigan Metropolitan Information Center, Center for Urban Studies, Wayne State University, United Community Services of Metropolitan Detroit, 1993.
33.
33. Baba ML, Abonyi MH: Mexicans of Detroit. Detroit, MI, Center for Urban Studies, Wayne State University, 1979.
34.
34. Valdes DN: Al Norte: Agricultural Workers in the Great Lakes Region, 1917-1970.Austin, University of Texas Press, 1990.
35.
35. Meredith R: A revival in the motor city. The New York Times, April 11, 1997, late edition, p. D1-D1.
36.
36. Jones JW: Profile of the Southeast Michigan Region’s Economy and Labor Market. Detroit, MI, Southeast Michigan Council on Government, 1998.
37.
37. Israel BA, Checkoway B, Schulz A, Zimmerman M: Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Educ Q21:149-170, 1994.
38.
38. Delgado M, Humm-Delgado D: Natural support systems: Source of strength in Hispanic communities. Social Work27(1):83-89, 1982.
39.
39. Santiago AM, Morash M: Strategies for serving Latina battered women. Urban Affairs Annual Review42:211-227, 1995.
40.
40. Santiago AM: Spouse Abuse Among Mexican Origin Women: An Assessment of “Cultural” vs “Family Stressors” Explanations of Domestic Violence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, March 1997.
41.
41. Viconi-Lopez A: Individual and Institutional Barriers to Help-Seeking Encountered by Battered Women of Mexican Origin. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis, Women’s Studies Program, University of Michigan, 1997.
42.
42. Ayuda, Inc.: Documentary Requirements for Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Cases, 1998. Available: http://www.ayuda.org
43.
43. Latino Family Services: A Community Assessment. Detroit, MI, Latino Family Services, 1996.
44.
44. Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A: Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health19:173-202, 1998.
45.
45. Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Selig S, Bayer I, Hollis R, Griffin CB: Development and implementation of principles for community-based research in public health, in MacNair RH (ed.): Research Strategies for Community Practice. New York, Haworth Press, 1998, pp. 83-110.
46.
46. University of Michigan: Urban Centers for Applied Research in Public Health: Detroit Community Academic Prevention Research Center [Proposal submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in response to Program Announcement 515]. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Education, 1995.
47.
47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Program Announcement Number 515: Cooperative Agreement for Urban Centers for Applied Research in Public Health. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994.
48.
48. Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: Community-Based Public Health Research Principles. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, July 24, 1996.
49.
49. Patton MQ: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
50.
50. Hancock T, Minkler M: Community health assessment or healthy community assessment: Whose community? Whose health? Whose assessment? in Minkler M (ed.): Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1997, pp. 139-156.
51.
51. Eng E, Blanchard L: Action-oriented community diagnosis: A health education tool. Int Q Comm Health Educ11(2):93-110, 1990-1991.
52.
52. Steuart GW: Planning and evaluation in health education. Int J Health Educ2:65-76, 1969.
53.
53. Chalk R, King P: Cross-cutting issues: The ecological context of family violence, in Chalk R, King P (eds.): Violence in Families: Assessing Prevention and Treatment Programs. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1998.
54.
54. Israel BA, et al: Evaluation of health education programs: Current assessment and future directions. Health Educ Q22:364-389, 1995.
55.
55. Francisco VT, Paine AL, Fawcett SB: A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Educ Research8:403-416, 1993.
56.
56. Zambrana RE: The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: Strategies for a meaningful partnership. J Medical Systems20:317-328, 1996.
57.
57. Marin G, Main BV: Enhancing research participation, in Marin G, Main BV (eds.): Research With Hispanic Populations(Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 23). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1991, pp. 42-60.
58.
58. Courtney R, Ballard E, Fauver S, Gariota M, Holland L: The partnership model: Working with individuals, families, and communities, toward a new vision of health. Public Health Nurs3:177-186, 1996.
59.
59. Lillie-Blanton M, Hoffman SC: Conducting an assessment of health needs and resources in a racial/ethnic minority community. Health Services Research30(1):225-236, 1995.
60.
60. Israel BA, Schurman SJ, Hugentobler MK: Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers. J Appl Behav Science28:74-101, 1992.
61.
61. Altman DG: Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychol14:526-536, 1995.
62.
62. Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Israel BA, Becker AB, Maciak BJ, et al: Conducting a participatory community-based survey: Collecting and interpreting data for a community health intervention on Detroit’s eastside. J Public Health Manage Practice4(2):10-24, 1998.
63.
63. Bogan G, Omar A, Knobloch RS, Leandris CL, O’Rourke TW: Organizing an urban African-American community for health promotion: Lessons from Chicago. J Health Educ23:157-159, 1992.
64.
64. Israel BA, Checkoway B, Schulz AJ, Zimmerman MA: Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Educ Q21:149-170, 1994.
65.
65. Steuart GW: Social and cultural perspectives: Community intervention and mental health. Health Educ Q20(suppl. 1):S99-S111, 1993.
66.
66. Bowen DJ, Kinne S, Urban N: Analyzing communities for readiness to change. Am J Health Behav21:289-298, 1997.
67.
67. Eng E, Parker EA: Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: The interface between program evaluation and empowerment. Health Educ Q21:199-200, 1994.
68.
68. Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Schultz JA, Richter KP, et al: Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation, in Fetterman DM, Kafterian SJ, Wandersman A (eds.): Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1996, pp. 161-187.
69.
69. Mittelmark MB, Hunt MK, Heath GW, Schmid TL: Realistic outcomes: Lessons from community-based research and demonstration programs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Public Health Policy14:437-462, 1993.
