Analysis Issues in School-Based Health Promotion Studies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cochran WG : Sampling Techniques. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

Lindquist EF : Statistical Analysis in Educational Research. Boston, Houghton-Mifflin, 1940.

Addelman S. : Variability of treatments and experimental units in the design and analysis of experiments. Am Stat Assoc 65:1095-1108, 1970.

Hopkins KD : The unit of analysis: group means versus individual observations. Educa Rese J 19:5-18, 1982.

Cook TD and Campbell DT : Quasi-Experimentation. Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings . Chicago, Rand McNally, 1979.

Porter AC and Chibucos TR : Selecting analysis strategies. In Borich GD (ed): Evaluating Educational Programs and Products . Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Educational Technology Publications, 1974, pp. 415-464.

Cox DR : The Use of a concomitant variable in selecting an experimental design . Biometrika. 44:150-158, 1957.

Winer B. : Statistical Principals in Experimental Design. New York , McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Feldt LS : A comparison of the precision of three experimental designs employing a concomitant variable. Psychometrika. 23:335-53, 1958.

10.

Flay BR : Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med 15:451-474, 1986.

11.

Hopkins KD : A strategy for analyzing ANOVA designs having one or more random factors . Educ Psychol Measur 43:107-113, 1983.

12.

Blair RC and Higgins JJ : Comment on "statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis ." J Educ Stati 11(2): 161-169, 1986.

13.

Murray DM , Hannan PJ : Design and analysis issues in the evaluation of lifestyle intervention studies . Submitted for publication, 1989.

14.

Zucker DM : Dangers of fixed model ANOVA in nested designs. Manuscript in preparation, 1989.