A major incentive for work-site health promotion activities has been the promise of increased company profitability. Some critics have challenged the economic argument based on distal outcomes such as increased employee longevity and less morbidity later in life. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between employee health behavior, quality of work life, and proximal organizationally valued outcomes. Data were collected from a stratified random sample of employees working at Pacific Lumber Company (N = 146), the largest single-site lumber mill in California. Although employee sleep patterns predicted health care utilization and psychological well-being, for the most part employee health behaviors were not strong predictors of proximal organizational effectiveness factors. However, quality-of-work-life factors significantly predicted organizational commitment, absenteeism, and tardiness frequency. The findings suggest the value of improving the system of work in which employees are embedded as part of comprehensive work-site health promotion efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Donaldson SI: Worksite health promotion: A theory-driven, empirically based perspective, in Murphy LR, Hurrell JJ, Sauter SL, Keita GP (eds.): Job Stress Interventions. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1995, pp. 73-90.
2.
2. National Survey of Worksite Health Promotion Activities. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1992.
3.
3. Donaldson SI, Gooler LE, Weiss R: Promoting health and well-being through work: Science and practice, in Arriaga XB, Oskamp S (eds.): Addressing Community Problems: Psychological Research and Intervention, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1998, pp. 160-194.
4.
4. Fielding JE, Piserchia PV: Frequency of worksite health promotion activities. Am J Public Health79: 16-20, 1989.
5.
5. Donaldson SI, Blanchard AL: The seven health practices well-being and performance at work: Evidence for the value of reaching small and underserved worksites. Prev Med24: 270-277, 1995.
6.
6. Stokols D, Pelletier KR, Fielding JE: Integration of medical care and worksite health promotion. JAMA273: 1136-1142, 1995.
7.
7. Warner KE: Selling health promotion to corporate American: Uses and abuses of the economic argument. Health Education Quarterly14: 39-55, 1987.
8.
8. Warner KE, Wickizer TM, Wolfe RA, Schildroth JE, Samuelson MH: Economic implications of workplace health promotion programs: A review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Medicine30: 106-112, 1988.
9.
9. Borman WC: Job behavior performance and effectiveness, in Dunnette MD, Hough LM (eds.): Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, pp. 271-326.
10.
10. Conrad KM, Conrad KJ, Walcott-McQuigg J: Threats to internal validity in worksite health promotion program research: Common problems and possible solutions. American Journal of Health Promotion6: 112-122, 1991.
11.
11. Matteson MT, Ivancevich JM: Health promotion at work, in Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, Wiley, 1988, pp. 279-306
12.
12. Pelletier KR: A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs. American Journal of Health Promotion5: 311-315, 1991.
13.
13. O’Reilly CA, Caldwell DF: Job choice: The impact of intrinsic factors on subsequent satisfaction and commitment. J Appl Psychol65: 559-565, 1980.
15. Angle H, Perry J: (1986). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 1-14, 1986.
16.
16. Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers R: Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Turnover. New York, Academic Press, 1982.
17.
17. Donaldson SI, Dent CW, Sussman S, Stoddard JL, Severson HH: The organizational implications of smokeless tobacco use in the lumber mill industry. Addict Behav21: 259-267, 1996.
18.
18. Sloan RP: Workplace health promotion: A commentary on the evolution of a paradigm. Health Education Quarterly14: 181-194, 1987.
19.
19. Karasek R, Theorell T: Healthy Work: Stress Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York, Basic Books, 1990.
20.
20. Stokols D: (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol47: 6-22, 1992.
21.
21. Levi L: Work worker and wellbeing: An overview. Work & Stress8: 79-83, 1994.
22.
22. Murphy LR, Hurrel JJ Jr, Sauter SL, Keita GP (eds.): Job Stress Interventions. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1995.
23.
23. Sauter SL, Murphy LR (eds.): Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1995.
24.
24. Stoddard JL, Sussman S, Dent CW, Donaldson SI, Severson HH: Characteristics of tobacco users in the lumber industry. American Journal of Health Behavior21: 91-99, 1997.
25.
25. Sussman S, Dent CW, Severson H, Craig S: Prevalence of tobacco use in the California lumber mill industry. Health Values18: 19-24, 1994.
26.
26. Breslow L, Breslow N: Health practices and disability: Some evidence from Alameda County. Prev Med22: 86-95, 1993.
27.
27. Breslow L, Enstrom JE: Persistence of health habits and their relationship to mortality. Prev Med9: 469-483, 1980.
28.
28. Donaldson SI: Effects of lifestyle and stress on the employee and organization: Implications for promoting health at work. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping6: 155-177, 1993.
29.
29. Mowday RT, Steers R, Porter LW: The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior14: 224-247, 1979.
30.
30. Dupuy H: The General Well-Being Schedule, in McDowell I, Newell C (eds.): Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 125-133.
31.
31. Lifestyle Assessment Questionnaire: LAQ Reliability/Validity Research Efforts. Stevens Point, WI, National Wellness Institute, 1988.
32.
32. Fielding JE: The challenges of work-place health promotion, in Weiss SM, Fielding JE, Baum A (eds.): Perspectives in Behavioral Medicine: Health at Work. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991, pp. 13-28.
33.
33. Donaldson SI, Grant-Vallone EJ: A conceptual framework for understanding self-report bias in occupational health psychology research. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1998.
34.
34. Schmitt N: Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior15: 393-398, 1994.
35.
35. Williams AF: Passive and active measures for controlling disease and injury: The role of health psychologists. Health Psychol1: 399-409, 1982.
36.
36. Rosen R, Berger L: The Healthy Company: Eight Strategies to Develop People, Productivity and Profits. Los Angeles, Tarcher, 1991.
37.
37. Baker E, Israel B, Schurman S: The integrated model: Implications for worksite health promotion and occupational health and safety practice. Health Education Quarterly23: 175-190, 1996.
38.
38. Fisher KJ, Glasgow RE, Severson HH, Terborg JR: Organizational characteristics associated with smokeless tobacco use. Health Values4: 34-40, 1994.
39.
39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy people 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991. (DHHS Publication No. PHS 91-50212.)
