Low literacy is a pervasive and underrecognized problem in health care. Approximately 21% of American adults are functionally illiterate, and another 27% have marginal literacy skills. Such patients may have difficulty reading and understanding discharge instructions, medication labels, patient education materials, consent forms, or health surveys. Properly assessing the literacy level of individual patients or groups may avoid problems in clinical care and research. This article reviews the use of literacy assessments, discusses their application in a variety of health care settings, and cites issues providers need to consider before testing. The authors describe informal and formal methods of screening for reading and comprehension in English and Spanish including the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, the Wide Range Achievement Test-3, the Cloze procedure, the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, and others. Practical implications and recommendations for specific use are made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Miles S, Davis T.: Patients who can't read: Implications for the health care system. JAMA274(21):1719-1720, 1995.
2.
2. Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, Parihk NS, Pitkin K, Coates WC, Nurss JR: Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA274:1677-1682, 1995.
4. Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A: Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 1993.
5.
5. Davis T, Crouch M, Wills G, Miller S, Abdehou D: The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. J Fam Pract31:533-538, 1990.
6.
6. Doak L, Doak C: Patient comprehension profiles: Recent findings and strategies. Patient Counsel Health Educ2:101-106, 1980.
7.
7. Meade C, Byrd J: Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. Am J Public Health79:204-206, 1989.
8.
8. Powers R: Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials. Ann Emerg Med17:124-126, 1988.
9.
9. Jolly B, Scott J, Feied C, Sanford S: Functional illiteracy among emergency department patients: A preliminary study. Ann Emerg Med22:573-578, 1993.
10.
10. Spandorfer J, Karras D, Hughes L, Caputo C: Comprehension of discharge instructions by patients in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med25:71-74, 1995.
11.
11. Meade C, Howser D: Consent forms: How to determine and improve their readability. Oncol Nurs Forum19:1523-1528, 1992.
12.
12. Grunder TM: On the readability of surgical consent forms. N Engl J Med244:56-58, 1980.
13.
13. Morrow GR: How readable are subject consent forms?JAMA74:955-960,1980.
14.
14. Davis T, Mayeaux E, Fredrickson S, Bocchini J, Jackson R, Murphy P: Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics93:460-468,1994.
15.
15. Weiss BD, Hart G, McGee DL, D'Estelle S: Status of illiterate adults: Relation between literacy and health status among persons with low literacy skills. JAm Board Fam Pract5:257-264, 1992.
16.
16. Davis TC, Bocchini JA, Fredrickson D, Aronld C, Murphy PW, Jackson RH, Hanna N, Patterson M: Study of parent comprehension of polio vaccine information pamphlets. Pediatrics97:804-810, 1996.
17.
17. Davis T, Fredrickson D, Arnold C, Murphy P, Herbst M, Bocchini J: A polio immunization pamphlet with increased appeal and simplified language does not improve comprehension to an acceptable level. Patient Educ Counsel, 33:25-37, 1998.
18.
18. National Work Group on Literacy and Health: Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills: Report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health. J Fam Pract, 46:168-175, 1998.
19.
19. Weiss B, Coyne C: Communicating with patients who cannot read. NEngl JMed, 337(4):272-273, 1997.
20.
20. Markwardt FS: Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN, American Guidance Service, 1989.
21.
21. Jastak S, Wilkinson GS: Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised 3. Wilmington, DE, Jastak Associates, 1993.
23. Anastasi A (ed.): Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York, Macmillan, 1988.
24.
24. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Fam Med25:391-395, 1993.
25.
25. Murphy PW, Davis TC, Decker BC, Jackson RH: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: Using a novel reading recognition test. J Reading37(2):124-130, 1993.
26.
26. Jackson RF, Davis TC, Bairnsfather LE, Gault H: Patient reading ability: An overlooked problem in health care. South Med J84(10):1172-1175, 1991.
27.
27. Weiss BD: Illiteracy among Medicaid recipients and its relation to health care costs. J Health Care Poor Underserved5:99-111, 1994.
28.
28. Parker R, Baker D, Williams M, Nurss J: The test of functional health literacy in adults (TOFHLA): A new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med10:537-545, 1995.
29.
29. Davis T, Arnold C, Berkel H, Nandy I, Jackson R, Glass J: Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer78:1912-1920, 1996.
30.
30. Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baker DW, Williams MV: Shame and health literacy: The unspoken connection. Patient Educ Counsel27:33-39, 1996.
31.
31. Guralnik J, Land K, Blazer D, Fillenbaum G, Branch L: Educational status and active life expectancy among older Blacks and Whites. N Engl J Med329:110-116, 1993.
32.
32. Weiss BD, Reed R, Keignan E, Abjad A: Literacy and performance on the mini-mental state examination. JAm Geriatr Soc43:807-810, 1995.
33.
33. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J: The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health87:1027-1030, 1997.
34.
34. Brandes WL (ed.): Literacy, Health and the Law: An Exploration of the Law and the Plight of Marginal Readers Within the Health Care System: Advocating for Patients and Providers. Philadelphia, Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania, Inc., 1996.
35.
35. Michielutte R, Bahnson J, Dignan MB, Schroeder EM: The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure. J Cancer Educ7(3):251-260, 1992.
36.
36. Doak L, Doak C, Meade C: Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Patient Educ23(8):1305-1311, 1996.
37.
37. Plimpton S, Root J: Materials and strategies that work in low literacy health communication. Public Health Rep109:86-92, 1994.
38.
38. Gagliano ME: A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education. J Med Educ63:785-791, 1988.
39.
39. Kumar NG, Bostow DW, Schapira DV, Kritch KM: Efficacy of interactive automated programmed instruction in nutrition education for cancer prevention. J Cancer Educ8:203-211, 1993.
40.
40. Meade CD: Producing videotapes for cancer education: Methods and example. Oncol Nurs Forum23:837-846, 1996.
41.
41. Weiss BD, Reed R, Kingman E: Literacy skills and communication methods of low-income, older persons. Patient Educ Counsel25:109-119, 1995.
42.
42. Consoli SM, BenSaid M, Jean J, Menard J, Plouin P-F, Chatellier G: Benefits of a computer assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools. Patient Educ Counsel26:343-347, 1995.
43.
43. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, Sem FW, Woermke De: Presenting clinical trial information: A comparison of methods. Patient Educ Counsel25:97-107, 1995.
44.
44. Sweeny MA, Gulino C: Interactive video in health care: Blending patient care, computer technology and research results. J Biocommun15:6-11, 1988.
45.
45. Davis TC, Holcombe RF, Pramanik S, Divers S: Informed consent for research: Patient attitude and comprehension of standard and simplified forms. J Gen Intern Med12(1):101-101, 1997.
46.
46. Stanovich KE: Word recognition: Changing perspectives, in Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthall PB, Pearson PD (eds.): Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2) New York, Longman, 1991, pp. 418-452.
47.
47. Conoly JC, Impara JC (eds.): The Twelfth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1995.
48.
48. Hosey GM, Freeman WL, Stracqualutsi FS, Gohdes D: Designing and evaluating diabetes education material for American Indians. Diabetes Educator16:407-414, 1990.
49.
49. Woodcock RW: Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. Circle Pines, MN, American Guidance Service, 1974.
50.
50. Taylor, W: Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Q30(fall):415-433, 1953.
51.
51. McKenna MC, Robinson RD: An introduction to the Cloze procedure: An annotated bibliography (rev. ed.). Newark, DE, International Reading Association, 1980.
52.
52. Holcomb CA: Measuring the readability of selected patient education materials: The Cloze procedure. Health Educ9(6):8-10, 1978.
53.
53. Nurss JR, Parker RM, Williams MV, Baker DM: Test of functional health literacy in adults: Technical report. Atlanta, GA, Center for the Study of Adult Literacy, Georgia State University, 1993.
54.
54. Nurss J, Baker D, Davis T, Parker R, Williams M: Difficulties in functional health literacy screening in Spanish-speaking adults. J Reading38:632-637, 1995.
55.
55. Blanchard JS, Garcia HS, Carter RM: Instrumento Para Diagnosticar Lecturas (Espanol English): Instrumentfor the diagnosis of reading. Dubuque, IA, Kendall-Hunt, 1989.
56.
56. Silvaroli N: Classroom Reading Inventory (3d ed.). New York, William C Brown, 1986.
