Pathways to Early Cancer Detection in Four Ethnic Groups is a program project funded by the National Cancer Institute aimed at increasing the use of breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved African American, Chinese, Hispanic, and Vietnamese women. The program project core is dedicated to cross-cultural studies including development of survey questions that are comparable in four languages. This article describes the Pathways surveys, summarizes the challenges encountered in question translation, and presents an adapted approach to translation. Concurrent, multilingual, decentered translation was the process through which an English version of each question was selected only when it could be directly and meaningfully translated into Mandarin, Cantonese, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Examples of challenges and how these were addressed in the Pathways surveys are presented, along with lessons learned throughout this process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PasickRJ, D'onofrioCN, Otero-SabogalR: Similarities and differences across cultures: Questions to inform a third generation for health promotion research. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S142–S161, 1996.
2.
HiattRA, PasickRJ, Pérez-StableEJ, McPheeSJ, EngelstadL, LeeM, SabogalF, D'onofrioCN, StewartS: Pathways to early cancer detection in the multiethnic population of the San Francisco Bay Area. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S10–S26, 1996.
3.
D'onofrioCN, PasickRJ, StewartS: Problems in Designing Surveys for Multi-Ethnic Populations and Directions for Improvement. Paper presented at the joint statistical meetings of the American Statistical Association, Orlando, FL, 1995.
4.
ChenA, LewR, ThaiV, KoK, OharaL, ChanS, WongW: Behavioral risk factor survey of Chinese in California 1989. MMWR41(16): 266–269, 1992.
5.
JenkinsCNH, McPheeSJ, BirdJA, BonillaNT: Cancer risks and prevention behaviors among Vietnamese refugees. West J Med153: 34–39, 1990.
6.
PhamCT, McPheeSJ: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese women. J Cancer Educ1(4): 305–310, 1992.
7.
Perez-StableEJ, MarinG, MarinBV: Behavioral risk factors: A comparison of Latinos and non-Latino whites in San Francisco. Am J Public Health84: 971–976, 1994.
8.
RamirezAG, VillarealR, SuarezL, FloresET: The emerging Hispanic population: A foundation for cancer prevention and control. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst18: 1–9, 1995.
9.
National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium: Screening mammography—A missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. JAMA264:54–58, 1990.
MarinG, VanOss MarinB: Research With Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1991.
12.
WernerO, CampbellDT: Translating, working through interpreters and the problem of decentering, in NarollR, CohenR (eds.): A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, New York, American Museum of Natural History, 1970.
13.
TriandisHC: Culture and Social Behavior. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.
14.
BerryJ: On cross-cultural comparability. Inter J Psychol4: 207–229, 1969.
15.
FinkA: The Survey Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1995.
16.
ProchaskaJO, DiClementeCC, NorcrossJC: In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol47(9): 1102–1114, 1992.
17.
RakowskiW: Assessing elements of women's decision-making about mammography. Health Psychol11: 111–118, 1991.
18.
GreenLW, KreuterMW: Health Promotion Planning and Educational and Environmental Approaches (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA, Mayfield, 1991.
19.
BanduraA: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev84: 191–225, 1977.
20.
RosenstockIM, StrecherVJ, BeckerMH: Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q15: 175–183, 1988.
21.
PasickRJ: Socioeconomic and cultural factors in the development and use of theory, in GlanzK, LewisFM, RimerBK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, in press.
22.
Otero-SabogalR, SabogalF, Perez-StableEJ: Psychosocial correlates of smoking among immigrant Latina adolescents. Monogr JNCI18: 65–71, 1995.
23.
Perez-StableEJ, SabogalF, Otero-SabogalR: Use of cancer screening tests in the San Francisco Bay Area: Comparison of Latinos and Anglos. Monogr JNCl18: 147–153, 1995.
HiattRA, PasickRJ: Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: Focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res in press.
26.
BrislinRW: The wording and translation of research instruments, in LonnerWJ, BerryJW (eds.): Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1986, pp 137–164.
27.
FerketichS, PhillipsL, VerranJ: Focus on psychometrics: Development and administration of a survey instrument for cross-cultural research. Res Nurs Health16: 227–230, 1993.
28.
HuiCH, TriandisHH: Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. J Cross Cultural Psychol20: 296–309, 1989.
29.
ShumakerSA, Jackson-ThompsonJ, DoakL: Survey measurement with minority populations, in BeckerDM, HillDR, JacksonJS (eds.): Health Behavior Research in Minority Populations (NIH Publication No. 92-2965). Bethesda, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
30.
National Center for Health Statistics: Organization and Activities—Monitoring the Nation's Health (CDC Publication No. 929-1200). Bethesda, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
