Measuring Community Competence in the Mississippi Delta: The Interface between Program Evaluation and Empowerment

Abstract

If political dynamics are included in the definition of community, health promotion programs have a greater potential to recognize that assisting people to empower their communities is as important as assisting them to improve their health. This paper reports on the evaluation methods employed for a health promotion program in a rural poor county of the Mississippi Delta that chose to define community in this way. The evaluation took an action research approach so that the methods would not contradict or interfere with the program's empowerment agenda. The methods required a close and collaborative working relationship among evaluators and local service providers, community leaders, and program staff who defined and operationalized eight dimensions of community com petence, determined the units of analysis, and developed the data collection protocol. Emphasis was placed on using the data to engage the program and three communities in a dialogue on how to confront a system with the difficult issues they faced. The findings revealed that after 1 year of implementation, community competence moved from social interactions internal to communities to those more externally focused on mediating with outside institutions and officials. At the same time, measures of self-other awareness and conflict containment showed a decrease or virtual nonexistence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Labonte R. : Community empowerment: The need for political analysis. Can J Public Health 80:87-88, 1989.

McKnight J. : Comments Made at Leadership and Model Development Meeting for Community-Based Public Health Initiative. Chicago, IL, WK Kellogg Foundation , 1991.

Heller K. : The return to community. Am J Community Psychol 17:1-15, 1989.

Sirott L. , Waitzkin H: Holism and self-care : Can the individual succeed where society fails? in Sidel V , Sidel R (eds.): Reforming Medicine. New York, NY, Pantheon, 1984.

Farquhar JW : The community-based model of life style intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol 108:103-111, 1978.

Coates TJ , Greenblatt RM : Behavioral change using interventions at the community level, in Holmes KK , Mardh P , Sparling PF , Wiesner PJ , Cates W , Lemon S , Stamm W (eds.): Sexually Transmitted Diseases . New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1990.

Jackson C. , Altman DG , Howard-Pitney B. , Farquhar JW : Evaluating community level health promotion and disease prevention interventions . New Directions Evaluation Res 43:19-32, 1989.

McAlister A. , Puska P. , Salomen J. , Tuomilehto J. , Koskela K. : Theory and action for health promotion: Illustrations from the North Karelia Project. Am J Public Health 72:43-54, 1982.

Fletcher S. , Harris R. , Gonzalez J. , Degnan D. , Lannin DR , Strecher VJ , Pilgrim C. , Quade D, Earp JA, Clark RL: Increasing mammography utilization: A Controlled study. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:112-120, 1993.

10.

Eng E. , Hatch J. : Networking between agencies and black churches: The lay health advisor model . J Prev Hum Services 10:123-146, 1991.

11.

Evans JR , Hall KL , Warford J. : Health care in the developing world: Problems and scarcity of choice . N Engl J Med 305:1117-1127, 1981 .

12.

Berger P. , Neuhouse R. : To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy . Washington, DC, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1977.

13.

Steuart G. : Social and Behavioral change strategies, in Phillips HT , Gaylord SA (eds.): Aging and Public Health. New York, NY, Springer, 1985.

14.

Wallerstein N. ; Powerlessness, empowerment , and health : Implications for health promotion programs . Am J Health Promotion 6:197-205, 1992.

15.

Eng E. , Young R. : Lay health advisors as community change agents. J Fam Community Health 15:24-40, 1992.

16.

Cottrell LS : George Herbert Mead, the legacy of social behaviorism, in Merton RK , Riley MW (eds.): Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing, 1980 .

17.

Cottrell LS : The competent community, in Kaplan BH , Wilson RN, leighton AH (eds.): Further Explorations in Social Psychiatry. New York, NY , Basic Books, 1976.

18.

Iscoe I. : Community psychology and the competent community. Am Psychol 29:607-613, 1974.

19.

Barbarin OA : Community competence: An individual systems model of institutional racism , in Barbarin O , Good P , Pharr M , Suskind J (eds.): Institutional Racism and Community Competence . Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1981.

20.

Hurley D, Barbarin O, Mitchell R: An empirical study of racism in community functioning, in Barbarin O , Good P , Pharr M , Suskind J (eds.): Institutional Racism and Community Competence. Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1981.

21.

Gatz M. , Barbarin O. , Tyler F. , Mitchell R. , Moran J. , Wirzbicki P, Crawford J, Engelman A: Enhancement of individual and community competence: The older adult as community worker. Am J Community Psychol 10:291-303, 1982.

22.

Goeppinger J. , Baglioni AJ : Community competence: A positive approach to needs assessment. Am J Community Psychol 13:507-523, 1985.

23.

Knight E. , Johnson HH , Holbert D. : Analysis of the competent community: Support for the community. Int Q Community Health Educ 11:145-154, 1991.

24.

Shinn M: Mixing and matching : Levels of conceptualization, measurement, and statistical analysis in community research, in Tolan P , Keys C , Chertok F , Jason L (eds.): Researching Community Psychology . Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1990.

25.

Rappaport J. : Research methods and the empowerment social agenda, in Tolan P , Keys C , Chertok F , Jason L (eds.): Researching Community Psychology . Washington, DC, American psychological Association, 1990.

26.

Lewin K. : Action-research and minority problems. J Social Issues 2:34-46, 1946. 27. Lincoln YS , Guba EG : But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation, in Williams DD (ed.): New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. 1986.

27.

Brown D. , Tandon R. : Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. J Appl Behav Sci 19:277-294, 1983.

28.

Spradley JP : Participant Observation. New York, NY, Holt, Rinehart & Wilson, 1988.

29.

Biddle W. , Biddle L: Community Development Process : The Rediscovery of Initiative. New York, NY, Holt, Rinehart & Winston , 1965.

30.

Freire P. : Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY, Seabury Press, 1970.

31.

Gray B: Collaborating : Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems . San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1989.