This study was conducted to test an instrument for measuring the level of institutionalization (LoIn) of health promotion programs. Institutionalization occurs when a program becomes an integral part of an organization, and the LoIn instrument is a beginning effort to measure the extent of program integration into organizations. The instrument is based on theory that holds that organizations are composed of production, maintenance, supportive, and managerial subsystems. Institutionalization occurs when a program becomes imbedded into these subsystems. A questionnaire designed to test this construct was mailed to 453 administrators in 141 organizations that operate health promotion programs. Based on 322 usable responses (71%), a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. The results support the hypothesis of an eight-factor model: four factors concern how routinized the program was in each subsystem and four factors concern the degree of program saturation within each subsystem. Correlations of the eight factors with the number of years the programs had been in operation, and managers' perceptions of program permanency, indicated that the four routinization factors were more highly correlated with program longevity than the four niche saturation factors, and the niche saturation factors were more highly correlated with managers' perceptions of program permanence than the routinization factors. The instrument, which is available from the authors, may be used as both a research instrument and a diagnostic tool in assessing the institutionalization of health promotion programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Buller PF, McEvoy GM: Determinants of the institutionalization of planned organizational changeGroup Organizational Stud14:33-50, 1989.
2.
Goodman RM, Steckler A.: A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programsFam Commun Health11:63-78, 1987.
3.
Kanter RM: Three tiers for innovation researchCommun Res15:509-523, 1988.
4.
Lefebvre RC: Strategies to maintain and institutionalize successful programs: A marketing framework, in Bracht N (ed): Health Promotion at the Community Level.Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
5.
Van de Ven AH , Rogers EN: Innovations and organizations: Critical perspectivesCommun Res15:632-657, 1988.
6.
Milio N.: Promoting Health Through Public PolicyPhiladelphia, PA , F.A. Davis, 1980.
7.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D., Steckler A., Glanz K.: An ecological perspective on health promotion programsHealth Educ Q15:351-378, 1988.
8.
Thompson B., Kinne S.: Social change theory: Applications to community health, in Bracht N (ed): Health Promotion at the Community Level.Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
9.
Kanter R.: The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American CorporationNew York, NY, Simon & Schuster , 1983.
10.
Goodman RM, Steckler A.: The life and death of a health promotion program: An institutionalization perspectiveInt Q Community Health Educ8:5-19, Winter 1988-1989.
11.
Steckler A. , Goodman RM: How to institutionalize health promotion programsAm J Health Promotion3:34-44, 1989.
12.
Yin RK: Changing Urban Bureaucracies: How New Practices Become RoutinizedLexington, MA, Lexington Books, 1979.
13.
Green LW, Wilson RW, Bauer KG: Data requirements to measure progress on the objectives for the nation in health promotion and disease preventionAm J Public Health73:18-24, 1983.
14.
Downs GW, Mohr LB: Toward a theory of innovationAdministration Soc10:379-408, 1979.
15.
Scheirer MA, Rezmovic EL: Measuring the degree of implementation—A methodological reviewEvaluation Rev7:599-633, 1983.
16.
Tornatzky LG, Klein J.: Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption—imple— mentation : A meta-analysis of findingsIEEE Trans Eng Management29:28-45, 1982.
17.
Ledford GE: The Persistence of Planned Organizational Change: A Process Theory Perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1984.
18.
Berman P.: Study of macro-implementation and micro-implementationPublic Policy26:157-184, 1978.
19.
Berman P., McLaughlin MW: Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Volume VIII: Implementing and Sustaining InnovationsSanta Monica, CA, Rand Corporation, 1978.
20.
Glaser E.: Durability of innovations in human services organizationsKnowledge3:167-185, 1981.
21.
Miles MB: Unraveling the mystery of institutionalizationEduc Leadership41:14-19, 1983.
22.
Beyer JM, Trice HM: Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work OrganizationsNew York, NY, The Free Press, 1978 .
23.
Kaluzny A., Hernandez S.: Organizational change and innovation, in Shortell S, Kaluzny A (eds): Health Care Management: A Text in Organization Theory and Behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
24.
Green LW, Lewis FM: Measurement and Evaluation in Health Education and Health Promotion . Palo Alto, CA, Mayfield, 1986.
25.
Williams W.: Implementation analysis and assessment, in Williams W., Elmore RF (eds): Social Program Implementation.New York, NY, Academic Press, 1976 .
26.
Gottfriedson GD: A theory-ridden approach to program evaluation: A method for stimulating researcher-implementer collaborationAm Psychol33:1101-1112, 1984 .
27.
Ross JG, Luepker RV, Nelson GD, Saavedra P., Hubbard BM: Teenage Health Teaching Modules: Impact of teacher training on implementation and student outcomesJ Sch Health61:31-34, 1991.
28.
Steckler A. , Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Davis S., Koch G.: Measurement of the diffusion of health promotion innovations in schools and community organizationsAm J Health Promotion6:214-221, 1992.
29.
Goodman PS, Dean JW: Creating long-term organization change, in Goodman PS: Associates: Change in Organizations.San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 1982.
30.
Goodman RM, Steckler A.: A framework for assessing program institutionalizationKnowledge Soc Int J Knowledge Transfer2:52-66, 1989.
31.
Katz D., Kahn RL: The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY, Wiley, 1978.
32.
Goodman RM: Factors Affecting the Long-Term Viability of Health Promotion Programs : An Institutionalization Perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1987.
33.
Cook TD, Campbell DT: Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field SettingsBoston, MA, Houghton Mifflin,1979 .
34.
Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1978.
35.
Selltiz C., Wrightsman LS, Cook SW: Research Methods in Social Relations (3rd ed.). New York, NY, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.
36.
Carmines EG, Zeller RA: Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1979.
37.
Campbell DT , Fiske DW: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrixPsychol Bull56:81-105, 1959.
38.
Messick S.: Evidence and ethics in the evaluation of testsEduc Res10:9-20, 1981.
39.
Comrey AL: Factor analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychologyJ Consult Clin Psychol56:754-761, 1988.
40.
Bentler PM: Theory and Implementation of EQS, a Structural Equations Program Version 2.0Los Angeles, CA, BMDP Statistical Software, 1985.
41.
Bollen KA: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY,Wiley, 1989.
42.
Jöreskog KG: A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis in Jöreskog KG, Sorbom D (eds.): Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equations Models.Cambridge, MA, Abt Associates, 1979.
43.
Bentler PM, Bonett DG: Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structuresPsychol Bull88:588-606, 1980.
44.
Tucker LR, Lewis CA: A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysisPsychometrika38:1-10, 1973.
45.
Eng E., Young R.: Lay health advisors as community change agentsFam Community Health15:24-40, 1992.
46.
Green LW: Is institutionalization the proper goal of grantmaking?Am J Health Promotion3:44, 1989.
47.
Ashton J.: The Healthy Cities Project: A challenge for health educationHealth Educ Q18:39-48, 1991.
48.
Bracht N.: Health Promotion at the Community LevelNewbury Park, CA , Sage, 1990.
49.
Kaluzny AD, Warner DM, Warren DG, Zelman WN: Management of Health ServicesEnglewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1982.
