Silverberg E. , Lubera JA: Cancer Statistics, 1989Ca - A Cancer Journal for Clinicians39:3-20, 1989.
2.
Harrell HC: To lose a breastAmerican Journal of Nursing72:676-677, 1972.
3.
Harris JR, Hellman S.: Limited surgery and radiation as primary local treatment for carcinoma of the breast, in Devita T, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds.): Important Advances in Oncology.Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott, 1985.
4.
Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV, et al.Illness-related and treatment related factors in psychological adjustment to breast cancerCancer55:2506-2513, 1985 .
5.
Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., et al.: Selection, follow-up and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: A randomized trial with breast cancer screening NCI Monograph. NCI Publication 85-2713, No. 67, 1985 .
6.
Tabar L., Fagerberg Cjg, Gad A., et al.: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography . Lancet1:829-832, 1985.
7.
Chu KC, Smart CR, Tarone RE: Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trialJournal of the National Cancer Institute80:1125-1132, 1988 .
8.
American Cancer Society: 1986 Survey of awareness and use of mammogramsPrince-ton, NJ, The Gallup Organization, 1987.
9.
Lane DS, Fine HL: Compliance with mammography referrals: Implications for breast cancer screeningNew York State Journal of Medicine February: 173-176, 1983.
10.
Heath CW, et al.Trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of-age and older—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987Journal of the American Medical Association261:2031-2032, 1989.
11.
Howard J.: Using mammography for cancer control: An unrealized potentialCa- A Cancer Journal for Clinicians37:33-48, 1987.
12.
National Cancer Institute: Breast cancer: A measure of progress in public understanding Technical Report, NCI Publication No. 84-2291, 1981.
13.
Fox SA, Klos DS, Tsou CV, Baum JK: Breast Cancer Screening recommendations: current status of women's knowledgeFamily and Community Health10:39-50, 1987.
Cohen DI, Littenberg B., Wetzel C., et al.: Improving physician compliance with preventive medicine guidelinesMedical Care20:1040-1045, 1982 .
16.
Fox S., Tsou CV, Klos DS: An intervention to increase mammography screening by residents in family practiceJournal of Family Practice20:467-471, 1985.
17.
McDonald CJ , Hui SL, Smith DM, et al.: Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical recordAnnals of Internal Medicine100:130-138, 1984.
18.
Farquhar JW, Maccoby N., Wood PD: Education and communication studies, in Holland WW, Detels R, Knox G (eds): Oxford Textbook of Public Health.London, Oxford University Press, 1985.
19.
Lazes PM, Kaplan LH, Gordon KA: The Handbook of Health EducationRockville, MD , Aspen Publishers, 1987.
20.
Rosenstock IM : Why people use health servicesMilbank Memorial Fund Quarterly44:94-127, 1966.
21.
Becker MH, Maiman LA: Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendationsMedical Care13:10-24, 1975.
22.
Rosenstock IM : Historical origins of the health belief modelHealth Education Monographs2:328-335, 1974.
23.
Janz NK, Becker MH: The health belief model: A decade laterHealth Education Quaterly11:1-47, 1984.
24.
Slenker SE, Grant MC: Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge about mammography among women over forty years of age. Journal of Cancer Education4:61-65, 1989.
25.
McGuire WJ: Attitudes and attitude change, in Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds): Handbook of Social Psychology, New York, Random House, 1985.
26.
Bandura A.: Social Learning TheoryEnglewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1977.
27.
Sherman RT, Anderson CA: Decreasing premature termination from psychotherapyJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology5:298-312, 1987.
28.
Sensenig PE, Cialdini RB: Social psychological influences on the compliance process: Implications for behavioral health, in Matarazzo J, Miller NE, Weiss SM, Herd JA, Weiss SM (eds): Behavioral Health: A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention.New York: Wiley, 1984.
29.
Knobf Tmk: Breast cancer: The treatment evolutionAmerican Journal of Nursing9:1109-1119, 1984 .
30.
Feig SA: Assessment of the hypothetical risk from mammography and evaluation of the potential benefitRadiological Clinics of North America21:173-191, 1983.
31.
Sechrest L., West SG, Phillips MA, et al. : Some neglected problems in evaluation research: Strength and integrity of treatments, in Sechrest L, West SG, Phillips MA, Redner R, Yeaton W (eds.): Evaluation Studies Review Annual , Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1979.
32.
Jurs SG, Glass GV: The effect of experimental mortality on the internal and external validity of the randomized comparative experimentJournal of Experimental Education40:62-66, 1971.
33.
Torgerson WS : Theory and Methods of ScalingNew York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958.
34.
Anderson LR , Ager JW: Analysis of variance in small group researchPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin4:341-345, 1978.
35.
Kenny DA, Judd CM: The consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variancePsychological Bulletin99:422-431, 1986.
36.
Joreskog KG, Sorbom D.: LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships By Maximum Liklihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares MethodsMooresville, IN, Scientific Software, 1984.
37.
Sobel ME, Bohrnstedt GW: Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models, in Tuma NB (ed): Sociological Methodology1985. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass , 1985.
38.
Ajzen I., Fishbein M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social BehaviorEnglewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1980.
39.
Green LW, Lewis FM: Measurement and Evaluation in Health EducationPalo Alto, CA, Mayfield Publishing Company, 1986.