Forty-nine schools (N = 5,680 fifth and sixth grade students) were assigned to pre test/treatment, pretest/no treatment, no pretest/treatment, and no pretest/no treat ment conditions in the context of an alcohol misuse prevention study. At the first posttest, five months after the pretest and two months after the intervention, the effects of the pretest and of the intervention were examined. The analyses showed that failure to correct for the design effect due to clustering within schools resulted in the overestimation of the significance of treatment and pretest effects. After correction for the design effect, a significant treatment effect in the hypothesized direction was found with respect to students' awareness of the content of the curriculum. As hypo thesized, significant treatment effects on the alcohol use and misuse measures had not yet developed but are expected to occur at subsequent posttest occasions. Significant pretest effects were found for indices measuring trouble with peers resulting from students' alcohol use, students' internal health locus of control, and their perceptions of adults as a locus of control for their health. Two of the three pretest effects were in the direction that would be hypothesized if the pretest were providing the same impe tus as the intervention. Implications of these findings for school-based substance abuse prevention programs are discussed.
Festinger L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1957.
3.
McGuire W.: The nature of attitudes and attitude change, in Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 3: The Individual In a Social Context . Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1969.
4.
Evans RI, Rozelle RM, Mittelmark M., Hansen WB, Bane A., Havis J.: Deterring the onset of smoking in children: Knowledge of immediate physiological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure, and parent modeling . Appl Soc Psychol8:126-135,1978.
5.
Evans RI, Rozelle RM, Maxwell SE, Raines BE, Dill CA, Guthrie TJ, Henderson AH, Hill PC: Social modeling films to deter smoking in adolescents: Results of a three-year field investigation. J Appl Psychol66:399-414, 1981.
6.
Flay, BR: Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: A review of findings. Health Psychol4:449-488, 1985.
7.
McAlister AL , Perry C., Killen J., Slinkard LA, Maccoby N.: Pilot study of smoking, alcohol, and drug abuse prevention. Am J Public Health70:719-721, 1980.
8.
Botvin G., Baker E., Botvin E., Filazzola A., Millman R.: Prevention of alcohol misuse through the development of personal and social competence: A pilot study. J Stud Alcohol45:550-552, 1984.
9.
Botvin G., Baker E., Renick N., Filazzola A., Botvin E.: A cognitive-behavior approach to substance abuse prevention. Addict Behav9:137-147, 1984.
10.
Duryea E.: Utilizing tenets of inoculation theory to develop and evaluate a preventive alcohol education intervention. J Sch Health53:250-256, 1983.
11.
Duryea E.: An application of inoculation theory to preventive alcohol education, Health Educ Jan/Feb:4-7, 1984.
12.
Duryea E., Mohr P., Newman I.Martin G., Egwaoje E.: Six-month follow-up results of a preventive alcohol education intervention . J Drug Educ14:97-104, 1984.
13.
Solomon, RL: An extension of control group design. Psychol Bull46:137-150, 1949.
14.
Campbell DT : Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol Bull54:297-312, 1957.
15.
Campbell DT, Stanley JC: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching, in Gage NL (ed); Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally , 1963. (Reprinted as Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, Rand McNally , 1966.)
16.
Kinder B., Pape N., Walfish S.: Drug and alcohol education programs: A review of outcome studies. Int J Addict15:1035-1054, 1980.
17.
Dielman TE, Shope JT, Butchart AT, Campanelli PC: Prevention of adolescent alcohol misuse: An elementary school program. J Pediatr Psychol11:259-281, 1986.
18.
Shope JT, Dielman TE, Smith L., Lorenger AT, Campanelli PC: Alcohol Misuse Prevention: Curriculum Guide for Fifth and Sixth Grades, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Office of Educational Resources and Research, 1985.
19.
Tucker LR: A Method for Synthesis of Factor Analysis Studies, Personnel Research Section Report No. 984, Washington, DC, Department of the Army, 1951.
20.
Dielman TE, Campanelli PC, Shope JT, Butchart AT: Susceptibility to peer pressure, self-esteem, and health locus of control as correlates of adolescent substance abuse. Health Educ Q14:207-221, 1987.
21.
Jones EE, Sigall H.: The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychol Bull76:349-364, 1971.
22.
Evans RI, Hansen WB, Mittelmark MB: Increasing the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior in children. J Appl Psychol62:521-523, 1977.
23.
Campanelli PC, Dielman TE, Shope JT: Validity of adolescents' self-reports of alcohol use and misuse using a bogus pipeline procedure. Adolescence22:8-22, 1987.
24.
Akers RL, Massey J., Clarke W., Lauer RM: Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid? Biochemical measures, randomized response, and the bogus pipeline in smoking behavior. Soc Forces62:234-251, 1983.
25.
Bauman KE, Koch GG, Bryan ES: Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking. Int J Addict17:1131-1136, 1982.
26.
Werch CE, Gorman DR, Marty PJ, Forbess J., Brown B.: Effects of the bogus-pipeline on enhancing validity of self-reported adolescent drug use measures. J School Health57:232-236, 1987.
27.
Williams R.Gillies P.: Do we need objective measures to validate self-reported smoking? Public Health London98:294-298, 1984.
28.
McAlister AL , Perry C., Maccoby N.: Adolescent smoking: Onset and prevention . Pediatrics63:650-658, 1979.
29.
Moskowitz JM , Malvin JH, Schaeffer GA, Schaps E.: An experimental evaluation of a drug education course. J Drug Educ14:9-22, 1984.
30.
Hopkins K.: The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations. Am Educ Res J19:5-18, 1982.
31.
Kish L.: Survey Sampling. New York, Wiley , 1965.
32.
Survey Research Center: OSIRIS IV User's Manual, 7th Ed. University of Michigan, 1982.
33.
O'Malley PM: Cigarette smoking among high school seniors: Did the rate decline? Prev Med13:421-426, 1984.
34.
Single E., Kandel D., Johnson BD: The reliability and validity of drug use responses in a large scale longitudinal survey. J Drug Issues5:426-443, 1975.
35.
Smart RG, Jarvis GK: Do self-report studies of drug use really give dependable results? Canadian J Criminology23:83-92, 1981.
36.
Dielman TE, Leech SL, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM, Horvath WJ, Radius SM: Dimensions of children's health beliefs. Health Educ Q7:219-238, 1980.
37.
Rachal JV, Guess LL, Hubbard RL, Maisto SA, Cavanaugh ER, Waddell R., Benrud CH: The Extent and Nature of Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Use: The 1974 and 1978 National Sample Studies. Rockville, MD, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1980 .
38.
Greenwald MA: Minimizing Alcohol Problems and Smoking: Final Report Year II: Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, 1982.
39.
Davis J., Stacey B.: Teenagers and Alcohol: A Development Study in Glasgow. London, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Social Survey Division, 1972.
40.
Coopersmith S. : The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco, Freeman, 1967.
41.
Parcel GS, Meyer MP: Development of an instrument to measure children's health locus of control . Health Educ Monogr6:149-159, 1978.
