The models used in the study of communication and health behavior have changed from those describing how to impose health actions on relatively passive respondents to models describing how respondents regulate their own health practices. We have traced the change from the fear-drive model, which described how fear induced change, to the parallel response model, which described how subjects processed information and generated coping responses to solve the problem posed by both the objective health threat and by their subjective fear. The data supporting this change showed that increasing fear led to more favorable attitudes but that fear alone was insufficient to create action: Specific action instructions had to be added to both high and low fear and both combinations produced the same level of health action. Neither the data nor the parallel model specified what subjects learned about the threat that made exposure to a high or low fear message necessary for behavior change. The parallel response model has been elaborated into a more complete systems model and new studies show how health threats are represented. They have found attributes such as IDENTITY (label and symptoms), CAUSES, TIME LINES or duration, and CONSEQUENCES, that set goals and criteria to generate and evaluate problem solving (coping) behavior. Suggestions are made for applying this more complete model to public health practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dingle JH :The ills of manSci Am229:77-84, 1973.
2.
Mortimer EA: Immunization against infectious diseaseScience200:902-907, 1978.
3.
Illich I.: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of HealthNew York, Pantheon, 1976
4.
Knowles JH: Doing Better and Feeling Worse: Health in the United StatesNew York, W.W Norton, 1977.
5.
Berkowitz L.: Social motivation In G Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 3). Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1969
6.
Becker MH (Ed) The health belief model and personal health behaviorHealth Educ Monogr 2(4), 1974
7.
Rogers RW: A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude changeI Psychol91 : 93-114, 1975.
8.
Kirscht JP: The health belief model and illness behaviorHealth Educ Monogr2(4): 387-408, 1974.
9.
Becker MH: Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance In DL Sackett & RB Haynes (Eds), Compliance with Therapeutic RegimensBaltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.
10.
Rosenstock IM : Historical origins of the health belief modelHealth Educ Monogr2(4): 328-335, 1974
11.
Leventhal H. :Findings and theory in the study of fear communications In L Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 5). New York, Academic Press, 1970.
12.
Jaccard )A.: A theoretical analysis of selected factors important to health education strategiesHealth Educ Monogr 3(2): 152-167, 1975.
13.
Janis IL: Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research In L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 3). New York, Academic Press, 1967.
14.
Higbee KL: Fifteen years of fear arousalPsychol Bull72:426-444, 1969
15.
Janis IL, Feshbach S.Effects of fear-arousing communication / Abnorm Soc Psychol48: 78-92, 1953.
16.
Leventhal H.Fear appeals and persuasion. The differentiation of a motivational constructAm / Public Health61: 1208-1224, 1971.
17.
Leventhal H.Niles P.: A field experiment on fear arousal with data on the validity of questionnaire measures/ Pers32: 459-479, 1964
18.
Rosen TJ, Terry NS, Leventhal H.: The role of esteem and coping in response to a threat communicationJournal of Research in Personality1690-107, 1982
19.
Ben-Sira Z. : Latent fear-arousing potential of fear-moderating and fear-neutral health-promotion informationSocial Science and Medicine15E: 105-112, 1981
20.
Miller GA, Galanter E. , Pribram KHPlans and the Structure of BehaviorNew York, Henry Holt, 1960
21.
Zajonc RB: Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferencesAm Psychol35: 151-175, 1980.
22.
Leventhal H. , Niles P.Persistence of influence for varying durations of exposure to threat stimuliPsychol Rep16. 223-233, 1965
23.
Rogers RW, Mewborn CR: Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responsesJ Pers Soc Psychol34. 54-61, 1976.
24.
Leventhal H.Singer R.Jones S.Effects of fear and specificity of recommendations upon attitudes and behaviorJ Pers Soc Psychol2: 20-29, 1965.
25.
Leventhal H. , Jones S.Trembly G. :Sex differences in attitude and behavior change under conditions of fear and specific instructionsJ Exp Soc Psychol2 : 387-399, 1966.
26.
Leventhal H. , Watts JC, Pagano F.Affects of fear and instructions on how to cope with dangerJ Pers Soc Psychol6: 313-321, 1967.
27.
Janis IL, Feshback S.: Personality differences associated with responsiveness to fear-arousing communicationsJournal of Personality23154-166, 1954
28.
Watts JCThe role of vulnerability in resistance to fear-arousing communications (Doctoral dissertation, Bryn Mawr College, 1966)Dissertation Abstracts International28(10-12 A). 4274, 1968
29.
Beck KH, Frankel A.A conceptualization of threat communications and protective health behaviorSocial Psychology Quarterly44: 204-217, 1981
30.
Lund AK, Kegeles SSIncreasing adolescents' acceptance of long-term personal health behaviorHealth Psychology1: 27-43, 1982
31.
Lazarus R.Psychological Stress and the Coping ProcessNew York, McGraw-Hill, 1966.
Meyer D.: The effects of patients' representation of high blood pressure on behavior in treatment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1980.
34.
Louis Harris and Associates, Inc.: The public and high blood pressure: A survey conducted for the National Heart and Lung Institute Study No. 2313, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 74-356. U.S. Government Printing Office , June 1973
35.
Blaxter M.Concepts of causality: Lay and medical In D) Osborne, MM Gruneberg, & JR Eiser (Eds), Research in Psychology and Medicine (Vol 2). New York, Academic Press, 1979.
36.
Mechanic D. :Social psychological factors affecting the presentation of bodily complaintsN Engl J Med286: 1132-139, 1972
37.
Schachter S.Singer JE :Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional statePsychol Rev69 : 379-399, 1962.
38.
Safer MATharps Q.Jackson T.Leventhal H. :Determinants of three stages of delay in seeking care at a medical clinicMed Care17 : 11-29, 1979
39.
Hayes-Bautista DE: Chicano patients and medical practitioners: A sociology of knowledge paradigms of lay professional interactionsSoc Sci Med12: 83-90, 1978.
40.
Nerenz DR: Control of emotional distress in cancer chemotherapy Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1979.
41.
Ringler K.: Unpublished dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1980.
42.
Leventhal H. , Meyer D., Nerenz D.The common sense representation of illness danger In S Rachman (Ed), Medical Psychology (Vol II). New York, Pergamon Press, 1980.
43.
Leventhal H. , Nerenz D., Leventhal E. :Illness and dehumanizing environments In J Singer, A Baum (Eds), Advances in Environmental Psychology , 1981.
44.
Pennebaker JW, Skelton A.: Psychological parameters of physical symptomsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin4: 524-530, 1978.
45.
Leventhal H.Integration of Emotion and Cognition. A view from the perceptual-motor theory of emotion 17th Annual Carnegie-Mellon Symposium: Emotional and Cognition, 1981.
46.
Herzlich C.: Health and Illness: A Social Psychological AnalysisNew York, Academic Press, 1973.
47.
Meyer D., Leventhal H.Gutmann M.: Symptoms in hypertension: How patients evaluate and treat themN Engl J Med (in press).
48.
Fabrega H. Jr:Toward a model of illness behaviorMed Care9:470-484, 1973.
49.
Bandura A.: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral changePsychol Rev84: 191-215, 1977.
Maccoby N., Farquhar JW, Wood PD, Alexander J.: Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effects of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behaviorJ Community Health3(2): 100-114, 1977
52.
McClelland DC: Toward a theory of motive acquisitionAm Psychol20: 321-333, 1965.
53.
Mahoney MJ, Mahoney K.Permanent Weight ControlNew York, Norton, 1976
54.
Evans RI, Rozelle RM, Lasater TM, Dembroski TM, Allen BJFear arousal, persuasion, and actual versus implied behavioral change: New prospectives utilizing a real-life dental hygiene programJ Pers Soc Psychol16. 220-227, 1970.
55.
Leventhal H. , Cleary PDThe smoking problem: A review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modificationPsychol Bull88: 2, 1980
56.
Lichtenstein E., Danaher BG: Modification of smoking behavior: critical analysis of theory, research and practice In M Hersen, RM Eisler, PM Miller (Eds), Progress in Behavior Modification (Vol 3). New York, Academic Press, 1975
57.
Pechacek T.: Modification of smoking behavior In Smoking and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General U S Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, Publication No (PHS) 79-50066. U S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
58.
Thompson EL : Smoking education programs1960-76Am J Public Health68: 250-255, 1978
59.
Evans RI: Smoking in children: Developing a social psychological strategy of deterrencePrev Med5: 122-127, 1976.
60.
Mitchell V. : Instant answers for students on what smoking does to the body Am LungAssoc Bull10: 67-10, 1978.
