Means of increasing vasectomy's acceptance for contraceptive purposes are examined cross-culturally. Given the questionable value of this method as a primary agent for reducing population growth, emphasis is placed on vasectomy's appropriateness as a family planning measure in multifaceted health and social welfare programs created to accomplish the goals of a given community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander N.: Oregon Primate Research Institute: Personal communication. November 16, 1972.
2.
Associated Press: Chinese visit.... Boston Herald Traveler, October 17. 1972.
3.
Auerbach S.: Researchers say vasectomy may increase risk of disease. Washington Post, August 30, 1972.
4.
Balswick JO: Attitudes of lower class males toward taking a male birth control pill. Fam Coord21:195-201, April 1972.
5.
Beasley JD, Parrish VW: Family planning and the reduction of fertility and illegitimacy: A preliminary report on a rural southern program. Soc Biol16:167-178, 1969.
6.
Berelson B.: Beyond family planning. Stud Fam Plann38:1-16, Feb 1969.
7.
Blake J.: Population policy for Americans: Is the government being misled?Science164:522-529, May 1969.
8.
Buckhout R.: Toward a two-child norm: Changing family planning attitudes. Amer Psychol27:16-26, January 1972.
9.
Bumpass LL, Presser HB: Contraceptive sterilization in the U.S.: 1965 and 1970. Demography9:531-548, November 1972.
10.
Carlson HE: Vasectomy of election. South Med J63:766-770, July 1970.
11.
Davis JE, Hulka JF: Elective vasectomy by American urologists in 1967. Fertil Steril21:615-621, 1970.
12.
Edey H.: Psychological aspects of vasectomy. Med Counterpoint4:19-24, January 1972.
13.
Ferber AS, Tietze C., Lewit S.: Men with vasectomies: A study of medical, sexual, and psychosocial changes . Psychosom Med29:354-366, 1967.
14.
Fried JJ: The incision decision. Esquire, June 1972, pp 118-178.
15.
Fujita, BN, McRoberts JW, Pion RJ: Voluntary sterilization of the male: A survey of elective vasectomies performed by Washington State urologists. Northwest Med70:755-758, November 1971.
16.
Holden C.: Sperm banks multiply as vasectomies gain popularity. Science176:32, April 7, 1972.
17.
Huda N., Ratcliffe, JW, Croley HT: A study of vasectomy physicians in East Pakistan. Pakistan J Fam Plann3:60-74, July 1969.
18.
Hulka JF, Davis JE: Vasectomy and reversible vasocclusion. Fertil Steril23:683-696, September 1972.
19.
Jackson P., Phillips B. et al: A male sterilization clinic. Brit Med J4:295-297, October 31, 1970.
20.
Johnson MH: Social and psychological effects of vasectomy. AmerJ Psychol121:482-486, November 1964.
21.
Kapil Skk: Study of factors leading to drop-out among men registered for vasectomy operation . J Fam Welfare15:10-17, September, 1968.
22.
Karefa-Smart JA: Harvard Medical School. Personal communication. April20, 1973.
23.
Kasirsky G.: Vasectomy, Manhood, and Sex. New York, Springer Pub Co, Inc, 1972, pp 99-113.
24.
Krishnakumar S.: Kerala's pioneering experiment in massive vasectomy camps. Stud Fam Plann3:177-185, August 1972.
25.
Kwon E-H. et al: Characteristics. Circumstances, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Vasectomized Men in Urban Areas. Seoul, Korea, Monograph of The UrbanPopulation Studies Center, 1970.
26.
Leader AJ: The Houston story: A vasectomy service in a family planning clinic. Fam Plann Perspect3:46-49, July 1971 .
27.
Lear H.: Vasectomy, a note of concern. JAMA219:1206-1207, February 28, 1972.
28.
Livingstone ES : Vasectomy, a review of 3200 operations. Can Med Assoc J105:1065, November 20, 1971.
29.
Mc Lean D.: Vasectomy: The perfect contraceptive. Boston Globe Magazine , December 3. 1972, pp 20-36.
30.
Mohan RP: Factors to motivation towards sterilization in two Indian villages. Fam Life Coord16:35-38, 1967.
31.
O'Connor VJ : Sexual effects of vasectomy. JAMA144:1502, December 23, 1950.
32.
Orleans LA: Population dynamics. In Quinn JR (ed): Medicine and Public Health in The People's Republic of China . U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, 1972, pp 191-209.
33.
Pai DN: War for Survival: Chronological Case Study in Family Planning. Bombay, Municipal Printing Press, No date.
34.
Pathfinder Fund: Pathfinder study shows... Latin American men endorse vasectomy. Fam Plans1:1-2, October 1972.
35.
Phadke GM, Phadke AG: Experiences in the reanastomosis of the vas deferens. J Urol97:888-890, 1967.
36.
Quaddus Ahg , Ratcliffe JW, Croley HT: A follow-up study of vasectomy clients in East Pakistan. Pakistan J Fam Plann3:38-48, July 1969.
37.
Rainwater L.: And The Poor Get Children. Chicago, Quadrangle Books, 1960.
38.
Repetto R.: India: A case study of the Madras vasectomy program. Stud Fam Plann31:8-16, May 1968.
39.
Reuben D.: Vasectomy is not the perfect method for birth control. Herald Traveler and Boston Record American. September 20, 1972.
40.
Riessman CK : Birth control, culture, and the poor. Amer J Orthopsychiat38:698-699, July 1968 .
41.
Roberts HJ: Delayed thrombophlebitis and systemic complications after vasectomy. J Am Geriat Soc16:267-280, 1968.
42.
Rogers DA, Ziegler FJ, Levy N.: Prevailing cultural attitudes about vasectomy: A possible explanation of postoperative psychological response. Psychosom Med29:367-375, 1967.
43.
Rosario FJ: An Analysis of Social-Psychological and Cultural Variables Found in Family Planning Diffusion Studies. New York, Syracuse University, 1970, and noted in Dissertation Abstracts International31(11-A):6163, May 1971.
44.
Rosenthal R. : Christian Science Monitor. September25, 1972.
45.
Sharma BP: Observation upon patients following vasectomy in Nepal. South Med J63:771-772, July 1970.
46.
Sidel R.: Women and Child Care in China. New York, Hill & Wang, 1972.
47.
Sinha SN, Jain PC, Prasad BG: A socio-medical study of urban sterilized males in Lucknow. J Indian Med Assoc53:68-77, July 16, 1969.
48.
Stokes CS, Dudley CJ: Family planning and conjugal roles: Some further evidence. Soc Sci Med6:157-161, 1972.
