W.H.O.Human Development and Public Health. Report of a W.H.O. Scientific Group. W.H.O., TRS, Geneva, Nov. 1971.
2.
PohlmanEdward. The Psychology of Birth Planning. Schenkman Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass., 1969.
3.
FawcettJames T. Psychology and Population: Behavioral Research Issues in Fertility and Family Planning. Population Council, N.Y., 1970.
4.
HillReuben. “A Classified International Bibliography of Family Planning Research (1955–1968) and Commentary”. Demography, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1968.
5.
SagarinEdward. “Taking Stock of Studies of Sex”. Annals of the Amer. Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 376, March, 1968.
6.
GlickIra D. “Mood and Behavioral Changes Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives: A Review of the Literature”. Psychopharmacologia, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1967.
7.
National Library of Medicine.Psychiatric Aspects of Abortion. Literature Search No. 70–29, Bethesda, 1970.
8.
RaoK.G. Cultural Factors Favoring and Hindering Family Planning in India. Paper presented to the Seminar on the Status of Women and Family Planning in India, Central Family Planning Institute, New Delhi, 1969 (Mimeo).
9.
ChristensenHarold T. “Children in the Family. Relationship of Number and Spacing to Marital Success”. Jour. of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1968.
10.
StrodtbeckFred L.CreelanPaul G. “The Interaction Linkage Between Family Size, Intelligence, and Sex-Role Identity”. Jour. of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1968.
11.
JamesLieberman E.. “Reserving a Womb: Case for the Small Family”. Amer. Jour. of Public Health, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1970.
12.
PakrasiKautiMalakerChittaranjan. “The Relationship Between Family Size and Fertility”. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1967.
13.
KellerAlan. “Psychological Sources of Resistance to Family Planning-Personality Variables”. In, BogueDonald J., Further Sociological Contributions to Family Planning Research, Community and Family Study Center, Univ. of Chicago, 1970.
14.
KiserClyde V.FrankMyrna E. “Factors Associated With the Low Fertility of Nonwhite Women of College Attainment”. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1967.
15.
Figa-TalamancaIrene. “Social and Psychological Factors in the Practice of Induced Abortion as a Means of Fertility Control in an Italian Population”. Genus, Vol. 27, Nos. 1–4, 1971.
16.
CrawfordThomas J.. “Family Planning Attitudes and Behavior as a Function of the Perceived Consequences of Family Planning”. In, BogueDonald J., Further Sociological Contributions to Family Planning Research, Community and Family Study Center, Univ. of Chicago, 1970.
17.
KarS.B. “Perceived Probability of Success and Motivational Basis for Family Planning Programme”. Antiseptic, Nov. 1968.
18.
YaukeyDavid. “Couple Concurrence and Empathy on Birth Control Motivation in Dacca, East Pakistan”. Amer. Sociological Review, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1967.
19.
Gonzalez-QuirogaAlberto. “Attitudes Toward Family Planning in Turrialba, Costa Rica”. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 3, Part 2, 1968.
20.
PoffenbergerThomasHusband- Wife Communication and Motivational Aspects of Population Control in an Indian Village. Department of Child Development, University of Baroda, India, 1968.
21.
KarS.B. “Measurement of Motivation For a Family Planning Educational Program”. Jour. of Family Welfare (India), Vol. 14, No. 4, June 1968. (See also unpublished Dr. P.H. dissertation, School of Public Health, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1966).
22.
KarS.B.BhatiaA.K. Study on Motivational Correlates of Family Planning Among Government Employees. Central Health Education Bureau, Technical Series, Research Paper. No. 7, New Delhi, India, June 1969. (Also in Jour. of Family Welfare (India), Vol. 16, No. 2, Dec. 1969).
23.
McMillanSylvia R. “Aspirations of Low-Income Mothers”. Jour. of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967.
24.
BlakeRobert R.Beliefs and Attitudes About Contraception Among the Poor. Monograph 5, Carolina Population Center, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Aug. 1969.
25.
LichtensteinStanleyRussoNancy F. “Values and Beliefs: An Approach to Transnational Family Planning.”In, Proceedings of Conference on Psychosocial Factors in Transnational Family Planning Research, American Institutes for Research, Washington, D.C., 1970.
26.
McCalisterDonaldThiessenVictor. “Prediction in Family Planning: Prediction of the Adoption and Continued Use of Contraception”. Amer. Jour. of Public Health, Vol. 60, No. 8, 1970.
27.
MenchnerJoan P. “Family Planning in India: The Role of Class Values”. Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1970.
28.
BackKurt. W. “New Fontiers in Demography and Social Psychology”. Demography, Vol. 4, 1967.
29.
RaoK.G. Leadership: Its Role in Family Planning. Paper presented at the Sixth Family Planning Action Research Workshop, Central Family Planning Institute, New Delhi, India, 1968 (Mimeo).
30.
DhillonH.S. “Local Leadership in Family Planning Programme”. Swasth Hind, Vol. 14, No. 9, 1970.
31.
KarS.B. “Cultural Determinants of Cognitive Gap and the Problem of Planned Change in Family Planning in India”. Indian Jour. of Public Health, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1968.
32.
RosenbergBernardBensmanJoseph. “Sexual Patterns in Three Ethnic Subcultures of an American Underclass”. Annals of the Amer. Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 376, March 1968.
33.
OteroLuis L. “The Mexican Urbanization Process and Its Implications”. Demography, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1968.
34.
FreedmanRonaldTakeshitaJohn Y. Family Planning in Taiwan: An Experiment in Social Change. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1969.
35.
Adenyi-JonesO. “The Place of Family Planning in Community Integration and Development.”In, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, International Planned Parenthood Federation, Santiago, Chile, 1967.
36.
KhanA.H.CholdinH.M. “Application of a Theory of Rural Development to Family Planning in East Pakistan.”In, World Population Conference, E/Conf/41.3, United Nations, N.Y., 1967.
37.
ChilmanCatherine S. “Fertility and Poverty in the U.S.: Some Implications for Family Planning Programs, Evaluation, and Research”. Jour. of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1968.
38.
DavidHenry P. “Psychosocial Factors in Transnational Family Planning Research.”In, Proceedings of the Conference on Psychosocial Factors in Transnational Family Planning Research, American Institute for Research, Washington, D.C., 1970.
39.
HauserPhilip M. “Current Research on Fertility and Family Planning in Latin America”. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 3, Part 2, 1968.
40.
BurmanB.K.R. “Family Planning From the Point of View of Cultural Anthropology”. In, RaoK.G.KapoorS.D., Behavioral Indices of Programme Impact (Report of a Workshop). Central Family Planning Institute, Social Research Division, New Delhi, 1967.