Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bilingual mHealth Social Media Intervention to Increase Care Engagement Among Young Gay,Bisexual,and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women With HIV
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2022
Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bilingual mHealth Social Media Intervention to Increase Care Engagement Among Young Gay,Bisexual,and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women With HIV
The North Carolina Community Research Partnership developed, implemented, and tested weCare, a 12-month bilingual mHealth social media intervention designed to reduce missed HIV care appointments and increase viral suppression among racially/ethnically diverse gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and transgender women living with HIV by harnessing established social media platforms (i.e., Facebook, texting, and dating apps).
Methods
We randomized 198 GBMSM and transgender women (mean age = 26) living with HIV to the weCare intervention (n = 100) or usual-care (n = 98) group. Inclusion criteria included being newly diagnosed or not in care. Participants completed structured assessments at baseline and 6-month postintervention follow-up (18 months after baseline data collection). HIV care appointment and viral load data were abstracted from each participant’s electronic health record at baseline and follow-up. Follow-up retention was 85.5%.
Results
Among participants, 94% self-identified as cisgender men, 6% as transgender, 64% as African American/Black, and 13% as Latine. Participants in both groups significantly reduced missed HIV care appointments and increased viral suppression at follow-up compared with baseline. However, there were no significant differences between weCare and usual-care participants for either outcome at follow-up.
Conclusions
An intervention effect was not identified for our two primary outcomes. Several factors may have influenced the lack of significant differences between weCare and usual-care participants at follow-up, including intervention implementation (e.g., staffing changes and lack of fidelity to the intervention as originally designed by the partnership), data collection (e.g., data collection time points and retention strategies), and clinical (e.g., contamination) factors.
AlonzoJ.Mann-JacksonL.GarciaM.TannerA. E.RhodesS. D. (2021). Meeting the needs of young Latino gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women living with HIV through the weCare intervention in the United States (US). EHQUIDAD, 15, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2021.0009
2.
AndersonM.KumarM. (2019). Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. Pew Research Center.
3.
AustinP. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
5.
BauermeisterJ. A.PingelE. S.Jadwin-CakmakL.HarperG. W.HorvathK.WeissG.DittusP. (2015). Acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a tailored online HIV/STI testing intervention for young men who have sex with men: The Get Connected! program. AIDS and Behavior, 19(10), 1860–1874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1009-y
6.
BergerB. E.FerransC. E.LashleyF. R. (2001). Measuring stigma in people with HIV: Psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 24(6), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10011
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). HIV in the Southern United States.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
10.
FriedmanL. M.FurbergC. D.DeMetsD. L. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical trials (3rd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
11.
Hightow-WeidmanL. B.LeGrandS.MuessigK. E.SimmonsR. A.SoniK.ChoiS. K.. . .EggerJ. R. (2019). A randomized trial of an online risk reduction intervention for young Black MSM. AIDS and Behavior, 23(5), 1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2289-9
12.
HorridgeD. N.OhT. S.AlonzoJ.Mann-JacksonL.TannerA. E.SongE. Y.. . . RhodesS. D. (2019). Barriers to HIV testing within a sample of Spanish-speaking Latinx gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: Implications for HIV prevention and care. Health Behavior Research, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1069
13.
MedichM.SwendemanD. T.ComuladaW. S.KaoU. H.MyersJ. J.BrooksR. A. (2019). Promising approaches for engaging youth and young adults living with HIV in HIV primary care using social media and mobile technology interventions: Protocol for the SPNS Social Media Initiative. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(1), Article e10681. https://doi.org/v8i1e10681
14.
MinklerM. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82(2 Suppl. 2), ii3–ii12.
15.
MuessigK. E.NekkantiM.BauermeisterJ.BullS.Hightow-WeidmanL. B. (2015). A systematic review of recent smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 interventions to address the HIV continuum of care. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 12(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-014-0239-3
16.
MullerK. E.FettermanB. A. (2003). Regression and ANOVA: An integrated approach using SAS software. SAS Institute & Wiley Inter-Science.
17.
OsborneJ. W. (2015). Best practices in logistic regression. SAGE.
18.
Pew Research Center. (2019). Mobile fact sheet.
19.
RanaA. I.van den BergJ. J.LamyE.BeckwithC. G. (2016). Using a mobile health intervention to support HIV treatment adherence and retention among patients at risk for disengaging with care. AIDS Patient Care and STDS, 30(4), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2016.0025
20.
RhodesS. D. (2004). Hookups or health promotion? An exploratory study of a chat room-based HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16(4), 315–327.
21.
RhodesS. D.DuckS.AlonzoJ.DanielJ.AronsonR. E. (2013). Using community-based participatory research to prevent HIV disparities: Assumptions and opportunities identified by The Latino partnership. Journal of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndromes, 63(Supplement 1), S32–S35.
22.
RhodesS. D.MannL.AlonzoJ.DownsM.AbrahamC.MillerC.. . . ReboussinB. A. (2014). CBPR to prevent HIV within ethnic, sexual, and gender minority communities: Successes with long-term sustainability. In RhodesS. D. (Ed.), Innovations in HIV prevention research and practice through community engagement (pp. 135–160). Springer.
23.
RhodesS. D.McCoyT. P.TannerA. E.StowersJ.BachmannL. H.NguyenA. L.RossM. W. (2016). Using social media to increase HIV testing among gay and bisexual men, other MSM, and transgender persons: Outcomes from a randomized community trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 62(11), 1450–1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw127
24.
RhodesS. D.TannerA. E.Mann-JacksonL.AlonzoA.SimanF. M.SongE. Y.. . . AronsonR. E. (2018). Promoting community and population health in public health and medicine: A stepwise guide to initiating and conducting community-engaged research. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 11(3), 16–31.
25.
SaberiP.Siedle-KhanR.SheonN.LightfootM. (2016). The use of mobile health applications among youth and young adults living with HIV: Focus group findings. AIDS Patient Care and STDS, 30(6), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2016.0044
26.
SchaferK. R.TannerA. E.Mann-JacksonL.AlonzoJ.SongE. Y.RhodesS. D. (2022). Stigma, social support, and substance use within racially/ethnically diverse men who have sex with men and transgender women living with HIV in the US Southeast. Southern Medical Journal, 115(1), 26–32.
27.
SunC. J.StowersJ.MillerC.BachmannL. H.RhodesS. D. (2015). Acceptability and feasibility of using established geosocial and sexual networking mobile applications to promote HIV and STD testing among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 19(3), 543–552.
28.
TaggartT.GreweM. E.ConserveD. F.GliwaC.Roman IslerM. (2015). Social media and HIV: A systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11), Article e248. https://doi.org/v17i11e248
29.
TannerA. E.MannL.SongE.AlonzoJ.SchaferK.ArellanoE.. . . RhodesS. D. (2016). weCare: A social media-based intervention designed to increase HIV care linkage, retention, and health outcomes for racially and ethnically diverse young MSM. AIDS Education and Prevention, 28(3), 216–230.
30.
TannerA. E.Mann-JacksonL.SongE. Y.AlonzoJ.SchaferK. R.WareS.. . . RhodesS. D. (2020). Supporting health among young men who have sex with men and transgender women with HIV: Lessons learned from implementing the weCare intervention. Health Promotion Practice, 21(5), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920936241
31.
TannerA. E.SongE. Y.Mann-JacksonL.AlonzoJ.SchaferK. R.WareS.. . . RhodesS. D. (2018). Preliminary impact of the weCare social media intervention to support health for young men who have sex with men and transgender women with HIV. AIDS Patient Care and STDS, 32(11), 450–458.
32.
ThompsonB. T.SchoenfeldD. (2007). Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 4(7), 577–582. https://doi.org/4/7/577
33.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). HIV National Strategic Plan for the United States: A roadmap to end the epidemic 2021–2025.
34.
WallersteinN. B.DuranB. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7(3), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906289376
35.
WallersteinN. B.DuranB. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(Suppl. 1), S40–S46. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.184036
36.
WareJ. E.Jr.SherbourneC. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.
