Using Animated Videos to Increase Patient Knowledge: A Meta-Analytic Review

Abstract

This article meta-analyzed 21 studies that tested the effectiveness of animated videos in improving learning in clinical and nonclinical settings compared with standard education. Animation was defined as the use of moving objects that are typically drawn or simulated. Videos ranged from just over 2 min in duration to 16 min in duration in articles published from 2009 through 2020. Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning provided the theoretical model to frame the current analyses. Findings indicated an overall positive effect (d = 0.35) for use of animation in improving viewers’ learning across a variety of health and clinical contexts, including surgery and diabetes. Moderator analyses indicated learning effects were greater in patient samples and samples with a higher proportion of male participants. Study findings were discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical implications for health communication scholars and practitioners.

Keywords

communication technology e-health evaluation general terms outcome evaluation patient education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Al Owaifeer

A. M.

Alrefaie

S. M.

Alsawah

Z. M.

Al Taisan

A. A.

Mousa

Ahmad

S. I.

(2018). The effect of a short animated educational video on knowledge among glaucoma patients. Clinical Ophthalmology, 12, 805–810. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s160684

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Rothstein

H. R.

(2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.

Bush

A. J.

Gresham

L. G.

(1986). The communication effects of animation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 14, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909888609360303

*Calderon

J. L.

Shaheen

Hays

R. D.

Fleming

E. S.

Norris

K. C.

Baker

R. S.

(2014). Improving diabetes health literacy by animation. Diabetes Education, 40, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721714527518

Carney

R. N.

Levin

J. R.

(2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26. https://doi.org/1040-726X/02/0300-0005/0

*Chakravarthy

Somasundaram

Mogi

Burns

Hoonpongsimanont

Wiechmann

Lotfipour

(2017). Randomized pilot trial measuring knowledge acquisition of opioid education in emergency department patients using a novel media platform. Substance Abuse, 39, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2017.1375061

Clark

J. M.

Paivio

(1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210. https://doi.org/1040-726X91/0900-01449$06.50/0

*Eggeling

Martina Bientzle

Shiozawa

Cress

Kimmerle

(2018). The impact of visualization formal and navigational options on laypeople’s perception and preference of surgery information videos: Randomized control trial and online survey. Journal of Participatory Medicine, 10, Article e12338. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000490

Feeley

T. H.

(2020). Assessing study quality in meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 46, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa001

10.

*Gouttebarge

Cowie

Goedhart

Kemp

S. P. T.

Kerkhoffs

G. M. M.

Patricios

Stokes

K. A.

(2019). Educational concussion module for professional footballers: From systematic development to feasibility and effect. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 5, Article e000490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000490

11.

*Housten

A. J.

Geetanjali

R. K.

Bevers

T. B.

Cantor

S. B.

Dixon

Hite AVolk

R. J.

(2020). Does animation improve comprehension of risk information in patients with low health literacy? A randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 40, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19890296

12.

*John

Campbell

Morris

Mukherjee

(2020). A randomized control trial to evaluate a novel 3D animation for patient education on Meniere’s disease. Australian Journal of Otolaryngology, 3, 18–18. https://doi.org/10.21037/ajo-19-71

13.

*Kakinuma

Nagatani

Otake

Mizuno

Nakata

(2011). The effects of short interactive animation video information on preanesthetic anxiety, knowledge, and interview time: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 112, 1314–1318. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31820f8c18

14.

*Kakinuma

Sawa

Komatsu

Yuji

Kami

Nakata

(2009). Effects of short interactive animation video on preanesthetic anxiety, knowledge and interview time. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 108, S107–S108.

15.

*Kayler

L. K.

Dolph

B. A.

Cleveland

C. N.

Keller

M. M.

Feeley

T. H.

(2020). Educational animations to inform transplant candidates about deceased donor kidney options: An efficacy randomized trial. Transplantation Direct, 6(7), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000001026

16.

*Kayler

L. K.

Keller

M. M.

Crenesse-Cozien

Dolph

Cadzow

Feeley

T. H.

(2019). Development and preliminary evaluation of ilearnKAS: An animated video about kidney allocation to support transplant decision-making. Clinical Transplantation, 33(8), Article e13638. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13638

17.

*Kayler

L. K.

Majumder

Bonner

Ranahan

Dolph

Cadzow

Feeley

T. H.

(2020). Development and preliminary evaluation of an animation (simplyKDPI) to improve kidney transplant candidate understanding of the kidney donor profile index. Clinical Transplantation, 34(3), Article e13805. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13805

18.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: The good, bad, and ugly. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250791

19.

Lowe

(2008). Learning from animation: Where to look, when to look. In Lowe

Schnotz

(Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 41–70). Cambridge University Press.

20.

Mayer

R. E.

(2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Mayer

R. E.

(2008a). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760

22.

Mayer

R. E.

(2008b). Evidence-based principles for learning with animation. In Lowe

Schnotz

(Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 30–46). Cambridge University Press.

23.

Mayer

R. E.

Moreno

(2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013184611077

24.

Mayilvaganan

Shivaprasad

(2018). Comparison of the efficacy of three different methods of explaining the surgical procedure of hemithyroidectomy. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22, 520–524. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_609_17

25.

*Meppelink

C. S.

van Weert

C. M.

Haven

C. J.

Smit

E. G.

(2015). The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: An experimental study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17, Article e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3979

26.

*Narimatsu

Kakinuma

Sawa

Komatsu

Matsumura

Kami

Nakata

(2011). Usefulness of bidirectional e-learning material for explaining surgical anesthesia to cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 22, 2121–2128. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq718

27.

*Occa

Morgan

S. E.

(2019). Animations about clinical trial participation for cancer patients and survivors. Journal of Health Communication, 24, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1668089

28.

Plass

J. L.

Homer

B. D.

Hayward

E. O.

(2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2, 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9011-x

29.

Rosenthal

(1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

30.

*Sanderson

S. C.

Suckiel

S. A.

Zweig

Bottinger

E. P.

Jabs

E. W.

Richardson

L. D.

(2016). Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients and the general public. Genetics in Medicine, 18, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.118

31.

*See

L.-C.

Chang

Y.-H.

Chuang

K.-L.

Lai

H.-R.

Peng

P.-L.

Jean

W.-C.

Wang

C.-H.

(2011). Animation program used to encourage patients or family members to take an active role for eliminating wrong-site, wrong-person, wrong-procedure surgeries: Preliminary evaluation. International Journal of Surgery, 9, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.11.018

32.

Sweller

(1999). Instructional design in technical areas. ACER Press.

33.

Thornton

D. J.

Patrick

Sullivan

Albert

J. M.

Wong

K. A.

Allen

M. D.

Kimble

Mekesa

Bowen

Sehgal

A. R.

(2019). Comparing web-based video interventions to enhance university student willingness to donate organs: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Transplantation, 33, e13506. https://doi.org/10.111/ctr.13506

34.

*Tou

Tou

Mah

Karatassas

Hewett

(2013). Effect of preoperative two-dimensional animation information on perioperative anxiety and knowledge retention in patients undergoing bowel surgery: A randomized pilot study. Colorectal Disease, 15, e256–e265. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12152

35.

Tukay

(2016). The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics. Computers & Education, 98, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.1016.03.004

36.

Tversky

Morrison

J. B.

Betrancourt

(2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017

37.

*Wang

D. S.

Jani

A. B.

Sesay

Tai

C. G.

Lee

D. K.

Echt

K. V.

Goodman

M. G.

Kilbridge

K. E.

Master

V. A.

(2015). Video-based educational tool improves patient comprehension of common prostate health terminology. Cancer, 121, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29101

38.

*Yap

Teo

T. Y.

Foong

Hussin

N. B.

Wang

Shen

Yeo

K. K.

(2019). A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a portable patient education video prior to corornary angiography and angioplasty. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 96(7), 1409–1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28655

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB