Community–academic research partnerships aim to build stakeholder trust in order to improve the reach and translation of health research, but there is limited empirical research regarding effective ways to build trust. This multisite study was launched to identify similarities and differences among stakeholders’ perspectives of antecedents to trust in research partnerships. In 2013-2014, we conducted a mixed-methods concept mapping study with participants from three major stakeholder groups who identified and rated the importance of different antecedents of trust on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Study participants were community members (n = 66), health care providers (n = 38), and academic researchers (n = 44). All stakeholder groups rated “authentic communication” and “reciprocal relationships” the highest in importance. Community members rated “communication/methodology to resolve problems” (M = 4.23, SD = 0.58) significantly higher than academic researchers (M = 3.87, SD = 0.67) and health care providers (M = 3.89, SD = 0.62; p < .01) and had different perspectives regarding the importance of issues related to “sustainability.” The importance of communication and relationships across stakeholders indicates the importance of colearning processes that involve the exchange of knowledge and skills. The differences uncovered suggest specific areas where attention and skill building may be needed to improve trust within partnerships. More research on how partnerships can improve communication specific to problem solving and sustainability is merited.
AlexanderJ. A.WeinerB. J.MetzgerM. E.ShortellS. M.BazzoliG. J.Hasnain-WyniaR.. . . ConradD. A. (2003). Sustainability of collaborative capacity in community health partnerships. Medical Care Research and Review, 60(4 Suppl.), 130S-160S.
2.
AllenM. L.Culhane-PeraK. A.PergamentS.CallK. T. (2011). A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members. Clinical and Translational Science, 4, 428-433. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00362.x
3.
ArmstrongK.RoseA.PetersN.LongJ. A.McMurphyS.SheaJ. A. (2006). Distrust of the health care system and self-reported health in the United States. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 292-297.
4.
AronsonM.BlaneyN.StephanC.SikesJ.SnappM. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
BarnettM.AndersonJ.HouleM.HigginbothamT.GatlingA. (2010). The process of trust building between university researchers and urban school personnel. Urban Education, 45, 630-660.
6.
BoulwareL. E.CooperL. A.RatnerL. E.LaVeistT. A.PoweN. R. (2003). Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Reports, 118, 358-365.
7.
Boutin-FosterC.PhillipsE.PalermoA.-G.BoyerA.FortinP.RashidT.. . . LoveG. (2008). The role of community-academic partnerships: Implications for medical education, research, and patient care. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2(1), 55-60.
8.
BrushB. L.BaiardiJ. M.LapidesS. (2011). Moving toward synergy: Lessons learned in developing and sustaining community–academic partnerships. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 5(1), 27-34.
9.
CargoM.DelormierT.LévesqueL.Horn-MillerK.McComberA.MacaulayA. C. (2008). Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic–indigenous community partnership. Health Education Research, 23, 904-914.
10.
CarneyJ. K.MaltbyH. J.MackinK. A.MaksymM. E. (2011). Community–academic partnerships: How can communities benefit?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4 Suppl. 3), S206-S213.
11.
Committee on Opportunities to Address Clinical Research Workforce Diversity Needs for 2010. (2006). The status of women and underrepresented minorities and programs of support. In OmmayaA.HahmJ. (Eds.), Opportunities to address clinical research workforce diversity needs for 2010 (pp. 33-54). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12.
Corbie-SmithG.ThomasS. B.GeorgeD. M. M.St. (2002). Distrust, race, and research. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 2458-2463.
13.
DalalM.SkeeteR.YeoH. L.LucasG. I.RosenthalM. S. (2009). A physician team’s experiences in community-based participatory research: Insights into effective group collaborations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6 Suppl. 1), S288-S291.
14.
DeutschM. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
15.
DoescherM. P.SaverB. G.FranksP.FiscellaK. (2000). Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 1156-1163.
16.
FrerichsL.DaveG.KimM.CheneyA.SullivanG.VarmaD.. . . Corbie-SmithG. (2015, April). Engaging stakeholders in defining factors of building and sustaining trust in community-engaged research partnerships. Paper presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17.
GilbertK. L.QuinnS. C.FordA. F.ThomasS. B. (2010). The urban context: A place to eliminate health disparities and build organizational capacity. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 39, 77-92.
18.
HalbertC. H.ArmstrongK.GandyO. H.ShakerL. (2006). Racial differences in trust in health care providers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 896-901.
19.
HallM. A.DuganE.ZhengB.MishraA. K. (2001). Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?Milbank Quarterly, 79, 613-639.
20.
IsraelB. A.KriegerJ.VlahovD.CiskeS.FoleyM.FortinP.. . . PalermoA. (2006). Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: Lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 1022-1040.
21.
IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health (IsraelB.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A., Eds.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
KaganS.KaganM. (1994). The structural approach: Six keys to cooperative learning. In SharanS. (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 115-133). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
23.
KaneM.TrochimW. M. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
KhodyakovD. (2007). Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach. Sociology, 41, 115-132.
25.
LesserJ.Oscós-SánchezM. A. (2007). Community–academic research partnerships with vulnerable populations. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 25, 317-337.
26.
LewickiR. J.TomlinsonE. C.GillespieN. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32, 991-1022.
27.
LewickiR. J.WiethoffC. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In DeutscheM.ColemanP. T. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86-107). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
LewisJ. D.WeigertA. J. (2012). The social dynamics of trust: Theoretical and empirical research, 1985-2012. Social Forces, 91, 25-31.
29.
LoweJ.RiggsC.HensonJ. (2011). Principles for establishing trust when developing a substance abuse intervention with a Native American community. Creative Nursing, 17(2), 68-73.
30.
LukeD. A. (2014). The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: A new instrument for public health programs. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2014/13_0184.htm
31.
MasudaJ. R.CreightonG.NixonS.FrankishJ. (2011). Building capacity for community-based participatory research for health disparities in Canada: The case of “partnerships in community health research.”Health Promotion Practice, 12, 280-292.
32.
MerzelC.BurrusG.DavisJ.MosesN.RumleyS.WaltersD. (2007). Developing and sustaining community—academic partnerships: Lessons from downstate New York healthy start. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 375-383.
33.
MinklerM. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82(Suppl. 2), ii3-ii12.
34.
MorenoG.RodríguezM. A.LopezG. A.BholatM. A.DowlingP. T. (2009). Eight years of building community partnerships and trust: The UCLA family medicine community-based participatory research experience. Academic Medicine, 84, 1426-1433.
35.
NorrisK. C.BrusuelasR.JonesL.MirandaJ.DuruO. K.MangioneC. M. (2007). Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution’s evolving perspective. Ethnicity & Disease, 17(Suppl. 1), S1-S27.
36.
ParrillR.KennedyB. (2011). Partnerships for health in the African American community: Moving toward community-based participatory research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 18(4), 150-154.
37.
PivikJ. R.GoelmanH. (2011). Evaluation of a community-based participatory research consortium from the perspective of academics and community service providers focused on child health and well-being. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 271-281.
38.
PlowfieldL. A.WheelerE. C.RaymondJ. E. (2005). Time, tact, talent, and trust: Essential ingredients of effective academic-community partnerships. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 217-220.
39.
RisiskyD.HoganV. K.KaneM.BurtB.DoveC.PaytonM. (2008). Concept mapping as a tool to engage a community in health disparity identification. Ethnicity & Disease, 18(1), 77-83.
40.
RobinsonJ. M.TrochimW. M. (2007). An examination of community members’, researchers’ and health professionals’ perceptions of barriers to minority participation in medical research: An application of concept mapping. Ethnicity & Health, 12, 521-539.
41.
RosasS. R.KaneM. (2012). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 236-245.
42.
ScheirerM. A. (2005). Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 320-347.
43.
SchellS. F.LukeD. A.SchooleyM. W.ElliottM. B.HerbersS. H.MuellerN. B.BungerA. C. (2013). Public health program capacity for sustainability: A new framework. Implementation Science, 8, 15. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-15
44.
Shediac-RizkallahM. C.BoneL. R. (1998). Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: Conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Education Research, 13, 87-108.
45.
StrandK.MarulloS.CutforthN.StoeckerR.DonohueP. (2003). Principles of best practice for community-based research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 5-15.
46.
Suarez-BalcazarY.HarperG. W.LewisR. (2005). An interactive and contextual model of community-university collaborations for research and action. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 84-101.
47.
TrochimW. M. K. (1993, November). The reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, TX.
48.
White-CooperS.DawkinsN. U.KaminS. L.AndersonL. A. (2009). Community-institutional partnerships: Understanding trust among partners. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 334-347.
49.
WolffM.MauranaC. A. (2001). Building effective community–academic partnerships to improve health: A qualitative study of perspectives from communities. Academic Medicine, 76, 166-172.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
