Although community-based participatory research (CBPR) shares many of the core values of health education and related fields, the outside researcher embracing this approach to inquiry frequently is confronted with thorny ethical challenges. Following a brief review of the conceptual and historical roots of CBPR, Kelly’s ecological principles for community-based research and Jones’s three-tiered framework for understanding racism are introduced as useful frameworks for helping explore several key challenges. These are (a) achieving a true “community-driven” agenda; (b) insider-outsider tensions; (c) real and perceived racism; (d) the limitations of “participation”; and (e) issues involving the sharing, ownership, and use of findings for action. Case studies are used in an initial exploration of these topics. Green et al.’s guidelines for appraising CBPR projects then are highlighted as an important tool for helping CBPR partners better address the challenging ethical issues often inherent in this approach.
1. Green LW, Mercer SL: Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?Am J Public Health91(12):1926-1929, 2001.
2.
2. Goodman R: Community-based participatory research: Questions and challenges to an essential approach. J Public Health Manag Practice7(5):v-vi, 2001.
3.
3. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health19:173-202, 1998.
4.
4. Beauchamp D: Public health as social justice. Inquiry12:2-14, 1976.
5.
5. Cornwall A, Jewkes R: What is participatory research?Soc Sci Med41(12):1667-1676, 1995.
6.
6. Minkler M, Wallerstein N: Introduction to Community-Based Participatory Research, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 3-26.
7.
7. Kelly JG, Dassoff N, Levin I, Schreckengost J, Stelzner SP, Altman E: A guide to conducting prevention research in the community: First steps. Prev Human Services6(1):1-174, 1988.
8.
8. Kelly JG: Seven criteria when conducting community-based prevention research: A research agenda and commentary, in Steinberg JA, Silverman MM (eds.): Preventing Mental Disorders: A Research Perspective. Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1987, pp. 57-72.
9.
9. Kelly JG, Mock LO, Tandon DS: Collaborative inquiry with African-American community leaders: Comments on a participatory action research process, in Reason P, Bradbury H (eds.): Handbook of Action Research. London, Sage, 2001, pp. 348-355.
10.
10. Jones CP: Levels of racism: A theoretical framework and a gardner’s tale. Am J Public Health8:1212-1215, 2000.
11.
11. Green LW, George MA, Daniel M, et al: Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion. Ottawa, Royal Society of Canada, 1995.
12.
12. Wallerstein N: Power between evaluator and community: Research relationships within New Mexico’s healthier communities. Soc Sci Med49:39-53, 1999.
13.
13. Hall BL: From margins to center: The development and purpose of participatory action research. Am Sociologist23:15-28, 1992.
14.
14. Zimmerman MA: Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis, in Rappaport J, Seidman E (eds.): Handbook of Community Psychology. New York, Plenum, 2000, pp. 43-63.
15.
15. The Community Health Scholars Program: Stories of Impact. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Community Health Scholars Program, 2002.
16.
16. Ansley F, Gaventa J: Researching for democracy and democratizing research. Change, January-February, 1997, pp. 46-53.
17.
17. Lewin K: Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues2:34-46, 1946.
18.
18. Brown LD, Tandon R: Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. J Appl Behav Sci19(3):277-294, 1983.
19.
19. Fals-Borda O: The application of participatory action-research in Latin America. Int Sociol2:329-347, 1987.
20.
20. Freire P: Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it, in Hall B, Gillette A, Tandon R (eds.): Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly? Participatory Research in Development. New Delhi, Society for Participatory Research in Asia, 1982, pp. 29-37.
21.
21. Freire P: Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, Seabury, 1970.
22.
22. Maguire P: Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst, MA, Center for International Education, 1987.
23.
23. Duran E, Duran B: Native American Postcolonial Psychology. Albany, State University of New York Press, 1995.
24.
24. Fine M: Working the hyphens, in Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 70-82.
25.
25. Gebbie K, Rosenstock L, Hernandez LM: Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, 2002.
26.
26. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Gartlehner G, Lohr KN, Rhodes S, Sammuel-Hodge C, Maty S, Lux L, Webb L, Sutton SF, Swinson T, Jackman A, Whitener L: Community-Based Participatory Research, Evidence Report. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in press.
27.
27. Aaron KF, O’Toole TP (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research (Special issue). J Gen Intern Med18(110):139-334, 2003.
28.
28. Maurana C, Wolff M, Beck BJ, Simpson DE: Working with our communities: Moving from service to scholarship in the health professions. San Francisco, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, 2000.
29.
29. Seifer SD: Documenting and assessing community-based scholarship: Resources for faculty, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 429-435.
30.
30. Kelly JG: Ecological constraints on mental health services. Am Psychol21:535-539, 1966.
31.
31. Chavez V, Duran B, Baker QE, Avila MM, Wallerstein N: The dance of race and privilege in community-based participatory research, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003.
32.
32. Duran B, Duran E, Brave Heart MYH: Native Americans and the trauma of history, in Thornton R (ed.): Studying Native America: Problems and Prospects in Native American Studies. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1998, pp. 60-78.
33.
33. Brave Heart MYH, De Bruyn LM: The American Indian holocaust: Healing historically unresolved grief. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res2:60-82, 1998.
34.
34. Tervalon M, Murray-Garcia J: Cultural humility vs. cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in medical education. J Health Care Poor Underserved9(2):117-125, 1998.
35.
35. Stoecker R: Are academics irrelevant?Am Behav Sci42(5):840-854, 1999.
36.
36. Reason P: Participation in human inquiry. London, Sage, 1994.
37.
37. Roe KM, Minkler M, Saunders FF: Combining research, advocacy and education: The methods of the Grandparent Caregiving Study. Health Educ Q22(4):458-475, 1995.
38.
38. Labonté R: Community empowerment: The need for political analysis. Can J Public Health80(2):87-88, 1989.
39.
39. Minkler M, Fadem P, Perry M, Blum K, Moore L, Rogers J: Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: A case study from the disability community. Health Educ Behav29(1):14-29, 2002.
40.
40. Nyden PW, Wiewel W: Collaborative research: Harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner. Am Sociol24:43-55, 1992.
41.
41. Maltrud K, Polacsek M, Wallerstein N: Participatory Evaluation Work Book for Community Initiatives. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico, 1997.
42.
42. Alvarez AR, Gutierrez LM: Choosing to do participatory research: An example and issues of fit to consider. J Community Practice9(1):1-20, 2001.
43.
43. Sullivan M, Chao SS, Allen CA, Kone A, Pierre-Louis M, Krieger J: Community-researcher partnerships: Perspectives from the field, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 113-130.
44.
44. El-Askari G, Freestone J, Irizarry C, et al: The Healthy Neighborhoods Project: A local health department’s role in catalyzing community development. Health Educ Behav25(2):146-159, 1998.
45.
45. Themba MN: Making Policy, Making Change: How Communities Are Taking Law Into Their Own Hands. Berkeley, CA, Chardon, 1999.
46.
46. Yoshihama M, Carr ES: Community participation reconsidered: Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. J Community Practice10(4):85-103, 2002.
47.
47. Wang CC, Cash JL, Powers LS: Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice1:81-89, 2000.
48.
48. Ong A: The Ethnography of Resistance. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991.
49.
49. Wallerstein N, Duran B: The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community-based participatory research and related participatory traditions, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 27-52.
50.
50. Reason P, Bradbury H (eds.): The Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London, Sage, 2001.
51.
51. Farquhar S, Wing S: Methodological and ethical considerations in community-driven environmental justice research, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 221-241.
52.
52. Brown L, Vega WA: A protocol for community-based research. Am J Prev Med12(4):4-5, 1996.
53.
53. Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Paine-Andrews A, Schultz JA: A proposal. Public Health Rep115:174-179, 2000.
54.
54. Lee P, Krause N, Goetchius C: Participatory action research with hotel room cleaners: From collaborative study to the bargaining table, in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds.): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003, 390-404.
55.
55. Zimmerman MA: The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. J Personality Assessment53:554-566, 1989.
56.
56. Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R: Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q79(2):179-205, III-IV, 2001.
