The Long-Term Impact of a Four-Session Work-Site Intervention on Selected Social Cognitive Theory Variables Linked to Adult Exercise Adherence

Abstract

Many work-site physical activity interventions use theoretical variables in the design of their programs. Yet, these interventions do not document the degree of change in theoretical variables produced by the intervention. This study examined the construct validity of an intervention designed to affect social cognitive theory variables linked to exercise behavior. Construct validation methods were used to evaluate an instructional intervention composed of four 60-minute sessions delivered across 2 weeks. Increases were found in self-regulation skills, outcome-expectancy values, and self-efficacy for the treatment group. No significant increases were detected for the comparison group on any study variables. Sixty-seven percent of the treatment group was able to maintain exercise behavior across 12 months, whereas the comparison group declined in exercise participation from 68% to 25% across 12 months. The study revealed the intervention effective in producing the intended changes in social cognitive theory constructs. The analysis shows self-regulation-mediated exercise behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O’Neal H, Shephard RJ: Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 15(4): 344-361, 1998.

2. Perry C, Baranowski T, Parcel G: How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: Social learning theory, in Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 161-186.

3. Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med 15(4): 266-297, 1998.

4. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84: 191-215, 1977.

5. Steinhardt M, Dishman R: Reliability and validity of expected outcomes and barriers for habitual physical activity. J Occup Med 31: 536-546, 1989.

6. Flay BR: Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: A review of the findings. Health Psychol 4(5): 449-488, 1985.

7. McCaul KD, Glasgow RE: Preventing adolescent smoking: What we have learned about treatment construct validity? Health Psychol 4(4): 361-387, 1985.

8. Cook T, Campbell D: Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1979.

9. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS: Self-efficacy and the stage of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exercise Sport 63: 60-66, 1992.

10.

10. Petosa S: Use of Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Exercise Behavior Among Adults. Ph.D. dissertation, the Ohio State University, Columbus, 1993.

11.

11. Garcia A, King A: Predicting long-term adherence to aerobic exercise: A comparison of two models. J Sport Exercise Psychol 13: 394-410, 1991.

12.

12. Hallam JS: Exercise Self-Efficacy: Instrument Development. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, November 1994.

13.

13. Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, Paffenbarger RS, Vranizan KM, Fraquhar JW, Wood PD: Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. Am J Epidemiol 122: 794-804, 1985.

14.

14. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Fortmann SP, Vranizan KM, Taylor CB, Solomon DS: Physical activity assessment methodology in the five-city project. Am J Epidemiol 121: 91-106, 1985.

15.

15. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6): 1173-1182, 1986.