Teachers' fidelity of implementation of substance use prevention curricula is widely considered desirable and is linked empirically to effectiveness. The authors examine factors pertinent to teachers' fidelity to curricula guides, using data from a nationally representative sample of 1,905 lead substance use prevention teachers in the nation's public and private schools. Findings suggest that about one-fifth of teachers of substance use prevention curricula did not use a curriculum guide at all, whereas only 15% reported they followed one very closely. Positively associated with adherence were teachers' discretion in their coverage of prevention lessons, beliefs concerning the effectiveness of the most recent training they received and the curricula they taught, and level of support they received from their principals for substance use prevention. The authors conclude that some degree of curriculum adaptation is inevitable and suggest how adherence to curricula guides may be improved through teacher training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Kann L, Brener ND, Allensworth DD: Health education: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000. J Sch Health71(7):266-278, 2001.
2.
2. US Dept. of Education: Progress in Prevention: Report on the National Study of Local Education Agency Activities under the Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities Act. US Dept. of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Planning and Education Service, Doc. 2002-003, 2000.
3.
3. Drug Strategies: Making the Grade: A Guide to School Drug Prevention Programs. Washington, DC, Drug Strategies, 1999.
4.
4. Bosworth K: Protective Schools: Linking Drug Abuse Prevention With Student Success. Tucson, AZ, Smith Initiatives for Prevention and Education, College of Education, University of Arizona, 2000.
5.
5. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health: Preventing Drug Use Among Children and Adolescents: A Research-Based Guide. Rockville, MD, NIDA, 1997.
6.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep43:1-18, 1994.
8. Tricker R, Davis LH: Implementing drug education in the schools: An analysis of the costs and teacher perceptions. J Sch Health58(5):181-185, 1988.
9.
9. Tappe MK, Galer-Unti RA, Bailey KC: Long-term implementation of the Teenage Health Teaching Modules by trained teachers: A case study. J Sch Health65:411-415, 1995.
10.
10. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T, Ifill-Williams M: Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prev Sci2:1-13, 2001.
11.
11. Domitrovich CE, Greenberg MT: The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children. J Educ Psychol Consult11:193-221, 2000.
12.
12. Backer TE: Finding the Balance: Program Fidelity and Adaptation in Substance Abuse Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review. Rockville, MD, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Conference Edition, 2001.
13.
13. Carlsyn R, Tornatzky LG, Dittmar S: Incomplete adoption of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling. Evaluation4:128-130, 1977.
14.
14. McDonald L: FAST Strategies for Balancing Program Integrity vs. Programmatic Drift vs. Adaptation in Local Implementation. Madison, University of Wisconsin, 2000. Retrieved November 26, 2001, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/FAST
15.
15. Basch CE: Research on disseminating and implementing health education programs in schools. J Sch Health54(6):57-66, 1984.
16.
16. Elias MJ, Zins JE, Weissberg KS, Greenberg MT, Haynes NM, Kessler R, Schwab-Stone ME, Shriver TP: Promoting Social and Emotional Learning: Guidelines for Educators. Alexandra, VA, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997.
17.
17. Farrar E, DeSanctis J, Cohen DK: Views from below: Implementation research in education. T Coll Rec82(1):77-116, 1980.
18.
18. Ridgely MS, Jerrell MJ: Analysis of three interventions for substance abuse treatment of severely mentally ill people. Community Ment Health J32:561-572, 1996.
19.
19. Rogers EM: Diffusions of Innovations. New York, Free Press, 1995.
20.
20. Scheirer MA: Process evaluation, in Wholey J, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (eds.): Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1994, pp. 40-67.
21.
21. Zimmerli WH: Organizing for school health education at the local level. Health Educ Q8:39-42, 1981.
22.
22. Emshoff J, Blakely C, Gray D, Jakes S, Brounstein P, Coulter J: An ESID Case Study at the Federal Level. Atlanta, Georgia State University. Under review.
23.
23. Arthur MS, Blitz C: Bridging the gap between research and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning. J Community Psychol28(3):241-256, 2000.
24.
24. Glaser EM, Backer TE: Innovation redefined: Durability and local adaptation. Evaluation4:131-135, 1977.
25.
25. Allen JP, Philliber S, Hoggson N: School-based prevention of teen pregnancy and school dropout: Process evaluation of the national replication of the Teen Outreach Program. Am J Community Psychol18(4):505-524, 1990.
26.
26. Dane AV, Schneider BH: Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control. Clin Psychol Rev18:23-45, 1998.
27.
27. McGrew JH, Bond GR, Dietzen L, Salyers M: Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. J Consult Clin Psychol62:670-678, 1994.
28.
28. Abbott RD, O'Donnell I, Hawkins D, Hill KG, Kosterman R, Catalano RF: Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. Am J Orthopsychiatry68:542-552, 1998.
29.
29. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenburg L, Tortu S, Botvin EM: Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a 3-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol58:437-446, 1990.
30.
30. Hansen WB, Graham JW, Wolkenstein BH, Rohrbach LA: Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: Results for fifth-grade students in the Adolescent Alcohol Prevention Trial. J Stud on Alcohol52:568-579, 1991.
31.
31. Hansen WB: Fidelity: Snatching victory from the jaws of defeat, in Hansen WB, Giles SM, Fearnow-Kenney MD (eds.): Improving Prevention Effectiveness. Greensboro, NC, Tanglewood Research, 2001, pp. 293-301.
32.
32. Rohrbach LA, Graham JW, Hansen WB: Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predictors of program implementation. Prev Med22:237-260, 1993.
33.
33. Pentz MA, Trebow EA, Hansen WB, MacKinnon DB, Dwyer JH, Johnson CA, Flay BF, Daniels S, Cormack CC: Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Eval Rev14:264-289, 1990.
34.
34. Parcel GS, Ross JG, Lavin AT, Portnoy B, Nelson GD, Winters F: Enhancing implementation of the teenage health teaching modules. J Sch Health61(1):35-38, 1991.
35.
35. Mayer JP, Blakely CH, Davidson WS: Social program innovation and dissemination: A study of organizational change processes. Policy Studies Review6(2):273-287, 1986.
37. McCormick LK, Steckler A, McLeroy KR: Diffusion of innovation in schools: A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. Am J Health Promotion9:210-219, 1994.
38.
38. Bauman LJ, Stein RE, Ireys HT: Reinventing fidelity: The transfer of social technology among settings. Am J Community Psychol19(4):619-639, 1991.
39.
39. Havelock RG: The Change Agent's Guide to Innovation in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications, 1973.
40.
40. Monahan JL, Scheirer MA: The role of linking agents in the diffusion of health promotion programs. Health Educ Q15(4):417-433, 1988.
41.
41. King KA, Wagner DI, Hedrick B: Safe and drug-free coordinators' perceived needs to improve violence and drug prevention programs. J Sch Health71(6):236-241, 2001.
42.
42. Hallfors D, Sporer A, Pankratz M, Godette D: Drug-Free Schools Survey: Report of Results. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, 2000.
43.
43. Berman P, Greenwood PW, McLaughlin MW, Pincus J: Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. V: Executive Summary. Prepared for the U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Santa Monica, CA, RAND, April 1975.
44.
44. Fullan M, Pomfret A: Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Rev Educ Res47:335-397, 1977.
45.
45. Connell DB, Turner RR, Mason EF: Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: Health promotion effectiveness, implementation and costs. J Sch Health55(8):315-321, 1985.
46.
46. Ross JG, Kuepker RV, Nelson GD, Saavedra P, Hubbard BM: Teenage Health Teaching Modules: Impact of teacher training on implementation and student outcomes. J Sch Health61(1):31-34, 1991.
47.
47. Perry CL, Murray DM, Griffin G: Evaluating the statewide dissemination of smoking prevention curricula: Factors in teacher compliance. J Sch Health60:501-504, 1990.
48.
48. Smylie MA: The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. Am Educ Res J25:1-30, 1988.
49.
49. Fors SW, Doster ME: Implications of results: Factors for success. J Sch Health55:332-334, 1985.
50.
50. Backer TE, Diaz E: Substance Abuse Prevention and Latino Communities: A Briefing Paper for the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Northridge, CA, Human Interaction Research Institute, 1999.
51.
51. Quality Education Data, Inc: QED National Education Database: Data Users Guide, Version 4.6. Denver, CO, Quality Education Data, Inc., 1998.
52.
52. Center for substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Center for the Advancement of Prevention (NCAP): Finding the Balance: Program Fidelity and Adaptation in Substance Abuse Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review. Rockville, MD, CSAP, NCAP. Conference edition, September 2001.
54. Ringwalt C, Ennett S, Vincus A, Thorne, J, Rohrbach LA, Simons-Rudolph A: The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools. Prev SC3:257-265, 2002.
55.
55. Sawhill IV: Poverty in the US: Why is it so persistent? J Econ Lit25:1075-1077, 1988.
56.
56. Kalton G, Maligalig DS: A comparison of methods of weighting adjustment for nonresponse, in 1991 Annual Research Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, 1991, pp. 409-428.
57.
57. Shah, BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS: SUDAAN User's Manual. Research Triangle Park, NC, Research Triangle Institute, 1996.
58.
58. Berman P, McLaughlin MW: Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change: Vol. 7. Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Contract No. R-1589/7. Washington, DC, U.S. Office of Education, 1977.
59.
59. Botvin GJ, Griffin, KW, Diaz T, Scheier L, Williams C, Epstein JA: Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addict Behav5:769-774, 2000.
60.
60. Spoth R, Redmond C, Shin C: Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: Extending a public health-oriented research base. J Consult Clin Psychol66(2):385-399, 1988.
