Community-based organizations (CBOs), including grassroots, voluntary organizations, are an important part of any strategy for addressing social determinants of health. Because of the challenges faced by CBOs, “enabling systems” may be needed to help them survive and fulfill their missions, and researchers have a variety of skills that allow them to play a role in such systems. The potential for researchers to play a role in supporting CBOs led the Seattle Urban Research Center (known as Seattle Partners) to establish a community research center (CRC) as one of its core projects. This article describes the operation of the Seattle Partners CRC and gives examples of how it has worked collaboratively with CBOs in providing technical assistance. The Discussion section draws from the CRC experience to examine the benefits and challenges of collaboration and the trade-off between capacity building and providing direct technical assistance in promoting long-term CBO viability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Office of Public Health and Science: Healthy People 2010 Objectives: Draft for Public Comment. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1998.
2.
2. Hertzman C, Frank J, Evans RG: Heterogeneities in health status and the determinants of population health, in Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (eds.): Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not?New York, Aldine, 1994, pp. 67-92.
3.
3. Jin RL, Chandrakant PS, Svoboda TJ:The impact of unemployment on health: A review of the evidence. Can Med Assoc J153(3):529-540, 1995.
4.
4. Kaplan GA, Pamuk E, Lynch JW, Cohen RD, Balfour JL: Income inequality and mortality in the United States. Br Med J312: 999-1003, 1996.
5.
5. Krieger N, Rowley DL, Herman AA, Avery B, Phillips MT:Racism, sexism and social class: Implications for studies of health, disease and well-being. Am J Prev Med9(suppl.): 82-122, 1993.
6.
6. Marmot MG, Kogevinas M, Elston MA: Social/economic status and disease. Annu Rev Public Health8: 111-135, 1987.
7.
7. Williams DR, Collins C: US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: Patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol21: 349-386, 1995.
8.
8. Milofsky C: Structure and process in community self help organizations, in Milofsky C (ed.): Community Organizations: Studies in Resource Mobilization and Exchange. New York, Oxford University Press, 1988, pp. 183-216.
9.
9. Reisch M: Should grassroots community organizations be linked to a political party to promote social change?, in Austin MJ, Lowe JI (eds.): Controversial Issues in Communities and Organizations. Needham Heights, MA, Allyn & Bacon, 1994, pp. 38-58.
10.
10. Edwards B, Marullo S:Organizational mortality in a declining social movement: The demise of peace movement organizations in the end of the cold war era. Am Sociol Rev60(6):908-927, 1995.
11.
11. Chavis DM, Florin P, Felix MJR: Nurturing grassroots initiatives for community development: The role of enabling systems, in Mizrahi T, Morrison J (eds.): Community Organization and Social Administration: Advances, Trends and Emerging Principles. New York, Haworth, 1993, pp. 41-63.
12.
12. Eisinger A, Senturia K:Doing community-driven research: A description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. J Urban Health78(3):519-534, 2001.
13.
13. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health19: 173-202, 1998.
14.
14. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Forging a New Public Health Partnership (findings 1995). Princeton, NJ, Author, 1995.
15.
15. Wiewel W, Lieber M: Goal achievement, relationship building, and incrementalism: The challenges of university-community partnerships. J Planning Educ Res17: 291-301, 1998.
16.
16. University of Minnesota. Community Health Intersection: Monograph Describing Program. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, Department of Healthcare Management, Carlson School of Management, 2001. Available from http://ispweb.csom.umn.edu/CHI/CHI.htm
17.
17. Sclove RE, Scammell ML, Holland B: Community Based Research in the United States. Amherst, MA, Loka Institute, 1998.
18.
19.
19. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Center for Urban Initiatives and Research, Stephen L. Percy, director; phone: (414) 229-5916; Web site: http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/CUIR/index.html
20.
20. University of Tennessee, Community Partnership Center, Knoxville, Tennessee; Virginia Seitz, executive director; phone: (423) 974-4542; Web site: http://www.ra.utk.edu/cpc/default.html
21.
21. University of Illinois at Chicago, the UIC Neighborhoods Initiative, Chicago, Illinois; Cynthia Barnes-Boyd, director, Atanacio Gonzalez, coordinator; Web site: http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/gci/uicni/
22.
22. Southeast Community Research Center—Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; Web site: http://www.loka.org/crn/southeastcrc.htm
23.
23. Concord College Community Research Center, Athens, West Virginia, Ms. Kathy Ball, program specialist; phone: (304) 384-6009; e-mail: bonner@concord.edu; Web site: http://mathcs.concord.edu/%7Ebadianv/crcoverview.htm
24.
24. Hood College, Center for Community Research, Frederick, Maryland; phone: (301) 696-3881; Web site: http://www.hood.edu/academic/sociology/communityresearch/
25.
25. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development Community Research & Partnerships, Berkeley, California; Judith Innes, director, Community Partnerships Office; Moira Kenney, research director; Web site: http://wwwurd.ced.berkeley.edu/partnerships.htm
26.
26. University of Minnesota at Duluth, Center for Community and Regional Research, Duluth, Minnesota; Lawrence M. Knopp, Jr., director; Lottie Hoder, support staff; phone: (218) 726-6246 or (218) 726-6300; Web site: http://www.d.umn.edu/ccrr/
27.
27. Wright State University, Center for Healthy Communities, Dayton, Ohio; Kate Cauley, center director; phone: (937) 775-1114; Web site: http://www.med.wright.edu/chc/
28.
28. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Center for Community Service and Learning, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Web site: http://www.umich.edu/%7Emserve/ucommresearch.html
29.
29. Zaal R, Leydesdorff L: Amsterdam science shop and its influence on university research: The effects of ten years of dealing with non-academic questions. Sci Public Policy14: 310-316, 1987.
30.
30. Stoecker R:Are academics irrelevant?: Roles for scholars in participatory research. Am Behav Scientist42(5):840-854, 1999.
31.
31. Dugan MA: Participatory and empowerment evaluation: Lessons learned in training and technical assistance, in Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A (eds.): Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1996, pp. 277-303.
32.
32. Altman DG: Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychol14: 526-536, 1995.
