This article presents findings of a multisite case study of the experience of nine federal Healthy Start Program sites in using consortia and other community involvement strategies in the fight against infant mortality. Using empowerment theory as a conceptual framework, qualitative data are employed to examine howcommunity involvement in the program through community-based consortia and other means contributed to empowerment at the organizational level. The article concludes with implications of the study findings for practice both within Healthy Start and in the context of other community-based health initiatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Fawcett S, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Schultz J, Richter KP, Berkley-Patton J, Fisher JL: Evaluating community initiatives for health and development, in Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, Ziglio E (eds.): Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. Copenhagen, Denmark, World Health Organization, European Series No. 92, 2001.
2.
2. Amick B, Levine S, Tarlov A, Walsh DC: Society and Health. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995.
3.
3. Freudenberg N, Eng E, Flay B, Parcel G, Rogers T, Wallertstein N: Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: In search of relevant theories and principles. Health Educ Q22(3):290-306, 1995.
4.
4. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q15:351-378, 1988.
5.
5. Steckler A, Allegrante JP, Altman D, Brown R, Burdine JN, Goodman RM, Jorgensen C: Health education intervention strategies: Recommendations for future research. Health Educ Q22(3):307-329, 1995.
6.
6. Fawcett S, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco V, Schultz J, Richter K, Lewis R, Williams E, Harris K, Berkley J, Fisher J, Lopez C: Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. A J Com Psych23:677-697, 1995.
7.
7. Kreuter M, Lezin N: Are Consortia/Collaboratives Effective in Changing Health Status and Health Systems? Paper prepared for the Health Resources and Services Administration, January 9, 1998.
8.
8. Badura M: The Healthy Start Program: Mobilizing to reduce infant mortality and morbidity. J Pediatric Nurs14(4):263-265, 1999.
9.
9. Thompson M, Minkler M, Allen Z, Bell JD, Bell J, Blackwell AG, Carpenter M, Rose K, Tamir HB: Community Involvement in the Federal Healthy Start Program. Oakland, CA, Policy Link, 2000.
10.
10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Health: United States 1995. Hyattsville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996. (DHHS Pub. No. [PHS] 96-1232)
11.
11. Kotch JB, Blakely CH, Brown SS, Wong FY: A Pound of Prevention: The Case for Universal Maternity Care. Washington, DC, American Public Health Association, 1992.
12.
12. FY 2001 Appropriations Bill. In Ominibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 106-554, December 26, 2000.
13.
13. Health Resources and Services Administration: Guidance for the Healthy Start Program. Washington, DC, Health Resources and Services Administration, 1991.
14.
14. Health Resources and Services Administration: Guidance for the Healthy Start Program. Washington, DC, Health Resources and Services Administration, 1996.
15.
15. Howell EM, Dulvaney B, McCormick M, Thiel Raykovich K: Back to the future: Community involvement in the Healthy Start Program. J Health Politics Policy& Law23:291-317, 1998.
16.
16. Children’s Health Act of 2000. 42 U.S. Code 201 (2000) P.L. No. 106-310.
17.
17. Plough A, Olafson F: Implementing the Boston Healthy Start Initiative: A case study of community empowerment and public health. Health Educ Q21(2):221-224, 1994.
18.
18. Rappaport J: Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services3(2-3):1-7, 1984.
19.
19. Wallertstein N: Powerlessness, empowerment and health: Implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promotion6(3):197-205, 1992.
20.
20. Zimmerman MA: Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis, in Rappaport J, Seidman E (eds.): Handbook of Community Psychology. New York, Plenum, 2000, pp. 43-63.
21.
21. Dodd P, Gutierrez L: Preparing students for the future: A power perspective on community practice. Admin Soc Work14:63-78, 1990.
22.
22. Bailey D: Using participatory research in community consortia development and evaluation: Lessons from the beginning of a story. Am Sociologist23:71-82, 1992.
23.
23. Mizrahi T, Rosenthal B: Managing dynamic tensions in social change coalitions, in Mizrahi T, Morrison JD (eds.): Community Organization and Social Administration: Advances, Trends and Emerging Principles. New York, Hayworth, pp. 1-33.
24.
24. Zimmerman M, Rappaport J: Citizen participation, perceived control and psychological empowerment. A J Com Psych16:725-750, 1988.
25.
25. Wandersman A, Florin P: Citizen participation and community organizing, in Rappaport J, Seidman E (eds.): Handbook of Community Psychology. New York, Kluwer/Plenum, 2000.
26.
26. Florin P, Wandersman A: An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. A J Com Psych18:41-55, 1990.
27.
27. Heller K, Price RH, Reinharz S, Riger S, Wandersman A: Psychology and Community Change: Challenges of the Future. Homewood, IL, Dorsey, 1984.
28.
28. Maton KI, Salem DA: Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case approach. A J Com Psych23:631-657, 1995.
29.
29. Yin RK: Case Study Research Design Methods(2nd edition). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1994.
30.
30. Bailey D, McNally Koney K: An integrative framework for the evaluation of community-based consortia. Evaluation Planning18:245-252, 1995.
31.
31. Kreuter M, Lezin NA, Young LA: Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice1(1):49-63, 2000.
32.
32. Wandersman A, Goodman RM, Butterfoss FD: Understanding coalitions and howthey operate: An “Open Systems” organization framework, in Minkler M(ed.): Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1997.
33.
33. Gruber J, Trickett E: Can we empower others? The paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school. A J Com Psych15:353-371.
34.
34. Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach(2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA, Mayfield, 1992.
35.
35. Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone L: Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: Conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res: Theory and Practice13(1):87-108, 1998.
36.
36. Robertson A, Minkler M: New health promotion movement: A critical examination. Health Educ Q21:295-312, 1994.
37.
37. Schorr LB: Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America. New York, Anchor, 1997.
38.
38. Mitchell S, Shortell S: The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: A typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Q, 78(2): 241-289, 2000.
39.
39. Israel B, Checkoway B, Schulz A, Zimmerman M: Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Educ Q21(2):149-170, 1994.
40.
40. Minkler M(ed.): Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1997.
41.
41. Green LW: Caveats on coalitions: In praise of partnerships. Health Promotion Practice1(1):64-65, 2000.
42.
42. Personal communication from Dr. Henry Spring, former director, National Healthy Start Program, Health Resources and Services Administration, March 21, 2000.
