This study evaluates the cognitive effects of an anti–handgun violence public service announcement (PSA) on sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students (N = 294). Participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group, which viewed a PSA depicting the death of an aggressive handgun user, or a comparison group, which viewed identical content except that the PSA showed no negative consequence for the handgun user. Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for race and gender, revealed that the treatment group was more likely to report negative expected outcomes for aggressively using a handgun and lower behavioral intentions to aggressively use a handgun compared with the comparison group. These findings suggest that observing handgun violence on television that depicts death as a negative physical consequence for the perpetrator may produce lower handgun-encouraging beliefs compared with observing no consequence for the perpetrator—the norm for most televised violence today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. National Center for Health Statistics: 1996 advance report of final mortality statistics. Monthly Vital Stats Report44(suppl.):7-7, 1993.
2.
2. Federal Bureau of Investigation: Uniform crime report: 1996 crime statistics. Available at http://wwwfbigov/pressrel/ucr/ucr/htm, 1997.
3.
3. Ash P, Kellermann AL, Fuqua-Whitley D, Johnson A: Gun acquisition and use by juvenile offenders. JAMA275:1754-1758, 1996.
4.
4. Gleaton TJ, et al: 1997-98 PRIDE Survey. Parents Resource Institute for Drug Education. Available at http://wwwprideusacom, 1998.
5.
5. Mercy JA, Rosenberg ML, Powell KE, Broome CV, Roper WL: Public health policy for preventing violence. Health Affairs12:7-29, 1993.
6.
6. Shalala DE: Addressing the crisis of violence. Health Affairs12:30-33, 1993.
7.
7. Zwerling C, McMillan D, Cook PJ, Gunderson P, Johnson N, Kellerman AL, Lee RK, Loftin C, Merchant JA, Teret S: Firearm injuries: Public health recommendations. Public Health Rep9:52-55, 1993.
8.
8. Zuckerman DM: Media violence gun control and public policy. Am J Orthopsychiatry66:378-389, 1996.
9.
9. Johnson NA: Public health response to handgun injuries: Prescription—communication and education. Prev Med9:47-51, 1993.
10.
10. Atkin C, Arkin E: Issues and initiatives in communicating health information to the public, in Atkin C, Wallack L (eds.): Mass Communication and Public Health: Complexities and Conflicts. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990, pp. 13-40.
11.
11. Biocca F, Brown JD, Shen F, Bernhardt JM, Batista L, Kemp K, Makris G, West M, Lee J, Straker H, Hsiao H, Carbone E: Assessment of television’s anti-violence messages, in National Television Violence Study (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1997, pp. 1-121.
12.
12. Biocca F, Brown JD, Makris G, Bernhardt JM, Gaddy G: Improving anti-violence public service announcements through systematic analysis and design, in National Television Violence Study (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1997, pp. 323-406.
13.
13. Wilson BJ, Kunkel D, Linz D, Potter J: Violence in television programming overall, in National Television Violence Study (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1997, pp. 1-170.
14.
14. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1986.
15.
15. Christoffel KK, Naureckas SM: Firearm injuries in children and adolescents: Epidemiology and preventive approaches. Current Opinion Ped6:519-524, 1994.
16.
16. Hemenway D, Prothrow-Stith D, Bergstein JM, Ander R, Kennedy BP: Gun carrying among adolescents. Law and Contemporary Problems59:39-53, 1996.
17.
17. McNabb SJ, Farley TA, Powell KE, Rolka HR, Horan JM: Correlates of gun-carrying among adolescents in south Louisiana. Am J Prev Med12:96-102, 1996.
18.
18. Martin SL, Sadowski LS, Cotten NU, McCarraher DR: Response of African American adolescents in North Carolina to gun carrying by school mates. J School Health66:23-26, 1996.
19.
19. Webster DW, Gainer PS, Champion HR: Weapon carrying among inner-city junior high school students: Defensive behavior vs. aggressive delinquency. Am J Public Health83:1604-1608, 1993.
20.
20. Durant RH, Kahn J, Beckford PH, Woods ER: The association of weapon carrying and fighting on school property and other health risk and problem behaviors among high school students. Arch Ped Adol Med151:360-366, 1997.
21.
21. Bernhardt JM, Brown JD, Golden S: Testing the effectiveness of public service announcements that depict immediate physical consequences of handgun violence. National Television Violence Study (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1998, pp. 250-282.
22.
22. Bryant J, Carveth RA, Brown D: Television viewing and anxiety: An experimental examination. J Communication31:106-119, 1981.
23.
23. National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control: Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989.
24.
24. Turner M: Et Tu Brutus. New York, Home Box Office, 1994.
25.
25. Atkin CK, Freimuth V: Formative evaluation research in campaign design, in Rice R, Atkin C (eds.): Public Communication Campaigns. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1989, pp. 131-150.
26.
26. Flora JA, Maibach EW: Cognitive responses to AISA information: The effects of issue involvement and message appeal. Communication Res17:759-774, 1990.
27.
27. Siska M, Jason J, Murdoch P, Yang WS, Donovan RJ: Recall of AIDS public service announcements and their impact on the ranking of AIDS as a national problem. Am J Public Health82:1029-1032, 1992.
28.
28. Crick NR, Dodge KA: Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Dev67:993-1002, 1996.
29.
29. Perry D, Perry LC, Rasmussen P: Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Dev57:700-711, 1986.
30.
30. Wheeler VA, Ladd GW: Assessment of children’s self-efficacy for social interactions with peers. Developmental Psych18:795-805, 1982.
31.
31. Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, W. H. Freeman, 1997.
32.
32. Fishbein M, Ajzen I: Beliefs Attitudes and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1975.
33.
33. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Taplin SH: The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior, in Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1997, pp. 85-112.
34.
34. Rubin AM: Cultivation index, in Rubin RB, Palmgreen P, Sypher HE (eds.): Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook. New York, Guilford Press, 1994, pp. 154-158.
35.
35. Gerbner G, Gross L, Morgan M, Signorielli N: Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective, in Bryant J, Zillmann D (eds.): Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.
36.
36. Tolan P, Guerra N: What Works in Reducing Adolescent Violence: An Empirical Review of the Field. Boulder, CO, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, 1994.
37.
37. Onwauchi-Saunders C, Brooks CA,Glenwood C: A framework for violence prevention: What can and should society do?Prev Med27:212-215, 1998.
38.
38. Johnson DS: Community solutions to violence: A Minnesota managed care action plan. Am J Prev Med14:93-97, 1998.
39.
39. Pastorino R: A mediation approach designed by adolescent disputants. Mediation Q14:251-266, 1997.
41. Wiist WH, Jackson RH, Kenneth W: Peer and community leader education to prevent youth violence. Am J Prev Med12(suppl.):56-64, 1996.
42.
42. Kelder SH, Orpinas P, McAlister A, Frankowski R, Parcel GS, Friday J: The Students for Peace project: A comprehensive violence-prevention program for middle school students. Am J Prev Med12(suppl.):22-30, 1996.
43.
43. Weiss BP: A public health approach to violence prevention: The Los Angeles coalition, in Hampton RL, Jenkins P, Gullotta TP (eds.): Preventing Violence in America. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1996, pp. 197-208.
44.
44. Hausman AJ, Spivak H, Prothrow-Stith D: Evaluation of a community-based youth violence prevention project. J Adolesc Health17:353-359, 1995.
45.
45. National Research Council: Understanding and Preventing Violence. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1993.
46.
46. Egan SK, Perry DG, Monson TC: Cognitive Social Learning Determinants of Aggression. Unpublished manuscript, Florida Atlantic University, 1997.
47.
47. Lochman JE, Dodge KA: Social-cognitive processes of severely violent moderately aggressive and nonaggressive boys. J Consult Clin Psych62:366-374, 1994.
48.
48. Cuddy ME, Frame C: Comparison of aggressive and nonaggressive boys’ self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Child Study J21:135-152, 1991.
49.
49. Smith SL, Wilson BJ, Kunkel D, Linz D, Potter WJ, Colvin CM, Donnerstein E: Violence in television programming overall, in National Television Violence Study (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1998, pp. 5-220.
