Community action research is an effective mechanism to improve the relationship between research and public health practice. The Alcohol and Public Health Research Unit (APHRU) and its Mäori research partner Whariki have developed practice in building partnerships with communities characterized by mutual respect of the different resources the partners bring to public health. A current APHRU/Whariki project focused on youth and drugs is a partnership with six communities in rural and urban areas throughout New Zealand, many predominantly Mäori. This project illustrates a model that aims to bridge the gap between research and practice, and to improve health and well-being through working with communities to increase their capacity to deal with alcohol and drug issues, and to introduce sustainable initiatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Holder H, Saltz R, Grube J, Voas R, Gruenewald P, Treno A: A community prevention trial to reduce alcohol-involved accidental injury and death: Overview.Addiction92(suppl.): S155-S173, 1997.
2.
2. Chavis D, Speer P, Resnick I, Zippay A: Building community capacity to address alcohol and drug abuse, in Davis R, Lurigo A, Rosenbaum D (eds.): Drugs and the Community. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1993, pp. 251-284.
3.
3. Bush R: Can we achieve sustainable reductions in harm in local communities?Drug Alcohol Rev16:109-111, 1997.
4.
4. Casswell S: A decade of community action research, in: Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Meeting: Fourth Symposium on Community Action and the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, 1999.
5.
5. Gerstein D, Green L (eds.): Preventing Drug Abuse: What Do We Know?Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1993.
6.
6. Kibel B, Stein-Seroussi A: Effective Community Mobilisation: Lessons From Experience. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1997.
7.
7. Gillies P: Effectiveness of Alliances and Partnerships for Health Promotion.Health Prom Int13:99-120, 1998.
8.
8. Winick C, Larson J: Community action programmes, in Lowinson JH, Ruiz, P, Millman RB, Langrod JG (eds.): Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1997.
9.
9. Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, et al: Review of community based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.Ann Rev of Public Health19:173-202, 1998.
10.
10. Labonte R: A community development approach to health promotion: A background paper on practice tensions, strategic models and accountability requirements for health authority work on the broad determinants of health. Draft paper prepared for Health Education Board of Scotland, Research Unit on Health and Behaviour Change, University of Edinburgh, 1998.
11.
11. Casswell S: Community action for the prevention of alcohol-related problems: Its genesis and potential future.21st Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium, 1995, Porto, Portugal.
12.
12. Casswell S: Evaluating community action to reduce alcohol-related harm, in Davidson C, Tolich M (eds.): Social Science Research in New Zealand: Many Paths to Understanding. Auckland, Longman, 1999, pp. 198-207.
13.
13. Duignan P, Casswell S, Stewart L: Evaluating community projects: Conceptual and methodological issues illustrated from the Community Action Project and the Liquor Licensing Project in New Zealand, in Greenfield T, Zimmerman R (eds.): Experiences With Community Action Projects: New Research in the prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems, OSAP Prevention Monograph-14. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1993, pp. 20-30.
14.
14. Moewaka Barnes H: Collaboration in community action: A successful partnership between indigenous communities and researchers.Health Prom Int15:17-25, 2000.
15.
15. Stewart L, Conway K: Community action to reduce rural drink driving crashes; encouraging sustainable efforts and changing environments, in Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Meeting. Fourth Symposium on Community Action Research and the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, 1999, pp. 233-246.
16.
16. Stewart L: Community Action to Reduce Alcohol Related Harm Amongst Young People: The Youth and Alcohol Project. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, 1999.
17.
17. McCreanor T, Moewaka Barnes H, Mathews T: Limited Impact Evaluation for the Waikato Rural Drink Drive Project. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, 1998.
18.
18. Health Select Committee on Mental Health and Cannabis: Inquiry Into the Mental Health Effects of Cannabis. Wellington, New Zealand, Health Select Committee on Mental Health and Cannabis, 1998.
19.
19. Spier P: Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1988 to 1997. Wellington, New Zealand, Ministry of Justice, 1988.
20.
20. Field A, Casswell S: Drug Use in New Zealand. Comparison Surveys 1990 & 1998. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, 1999.
21.
21. Field A, Casswell S: Drugs in New Zealand National Survey 1998. Auckland, New Zealand, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, 1999.
22.
22. Fergusson D, Horwood L: Early onset cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in young adults.Addiction92:279-296, 1997.
23.
23. Hall W, Solowij N, Lemon J: The Health and Psychological Consequences of Cannabis Use, National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 25. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994.
24.
24. Drugs Advisory Committee, New Zealand Drug Foundation, Public Health Commission: Cannabis and Health in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand, Public Health Commission, 1995.
25.
25. Paton-Simpson G: Personal communication. Clinical Information and Research Unit of the Auckland Regional Alcohol and Drug Service, Auckland, New Zealand, August 10, 1999.
26.
26. Dacey B, Moewaka Barnes H: Te Ao Taru Kino. Drug Use Among Mäori in 1998. Auckland, New Zealand, Whariki/Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, 1999.
27.
27. Ministry of Health: Cannabis: The Public Health Issues. Wellington, New Zealand, Ministry of Health, 1996.
28.
28. Walker L, Cocklin C, Blunden G, Davis P, Kearns R, Scott K: Cannabis Highs and Lows: Sustaining and Dislocating Rural Communities, Occasional Publication 36. Auckland, New Zealand, Department of Geography, University of Auckland, 1998.
29.
29. Burgess R: Deconstructing drug prevention: Towards an alternative purpose.Drugs: Educ Prev Policy4:271-283, 1997.
30.
30. Pearson G: Drugs and deprivation, in Dickeron J, Stimson G (eds.): Health in the Inner City: Drugs in the City: Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Society of Health. London, Royal Society of Health, 1995.
31.
31. White R: Young People, Drugs and the Criminal Economy.International Conference on Youth and Drugs, 1998, Melbourne, Australia.
32.
32. Ministry of Education: Quarterly Reports & Annual Report on Suspensions. Wellington, New Zealand, Ministry of Education, 1997 and 1998.
33.
33. YouthLaw: The Effects of Indefinite Suspension on Young People: Young People Talk About Their Experiences. Auckland, New Zealand, YouthLaw Tino Rangatiratanga Taitamariki (Inc.), 1997.
34.
34. Abel S, Casswell S: Cannabis in schools: Issues for principals and boards.NZ J Educ Stud33: 55-66, 1998.
35.
35. Durie M: The CHI Model: A Culturally Appropriate Auditing Model for Use by the Public Health Commission to Monitor Provider Contracts. Palmerston North, New Zealand, Te Pumanawa Hauora, Massey University, 1993.
36.
36. Forster ME, Ratima MM: Healthy Marae: A Report for Midland Health. Palmerston North, New Zealand, Te Pumanawa Hauora, Massey University, 1997.
37.
37. Durie M: Te Pae Mahutonga: A Model for Mäori Health Promotion.Health Promotion Forum Conference, 1999, Napier, New Zealand.
38.
38. Dehar M, Duignan P, Casswell S: Formative and process evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programs.Evaluation Rev17:204-220, 1993.
39.
39. McClintock C: Towards a theory of formative programme evaluation.Evaluation Stud Rev Annual11:205-223, 1986.
40.
40. Fitzpatrick J: Roles of the evaluator in innovative programs: A formative evaluation.Evaluation Rev12:449-461, 1988.
41.
41. Stewart L, Benseman J, Harre M, Casswell S: Using electronic communication to enhance information exchange between community health workers.Health Prom J Aust4:41-43, 1994.
