Implementing a 5-a-Day Peer Health Educator Program for Public Sector Labor and Trades Employees

Abstract

Peer education in the Arizona 5-a-Day project achieved lasting improvements in fruit and vegetable intake among multicultural employees. Measures monitored implementation of peer education from peer educators’ logs, the program’s reach from employee surveys, and employees’ use in terms of employees’ dietary change. Peer educators logged 9,182 coworker contacts. Contacts averaged 10.9 minutes, according to coworkers. Coworkers read an average of 4.7 booklets and 2.23 newsletters. Many employees talked with peer educators (59%) and read materials (54%) after the program finished. Employee reports of peer educator contact were positively associated with fruit and vegetable intake. Peer education was implemented as intended and reached many coworkers. It continued after program completion, reached into coworkers’ families, and was used by employees to improve intake. This method can be used with employees who rely on informal sources and whose work presents barriers to wellness activities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Block G , Patterson B , Subar A : Fruit, vegetables and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 18:1-29, 1992.

2. LaVecchia CL , Decarli A , Pagano R : Vegetable consumption and risk of chronic disease. Epidemiology 9:208-210, 1998.

3. Subar A , Heimendinger J , Patterson B , Krebs-Smith S , Pivonka E , Kessler R : Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: The baseline survey of the Five a Day for Better Health Program. Am J Health Promot 9:352-360, 1995.

4. Eng E , Parker E , Harlan C : Lay health advisor intervention strategies: A continuum from natural helping to paraprofessional helping. Health Educ Behav 24:413-417, 1997.

5. Erickson BH : The relational basis of attitudes, in Wellman B , Berkowitz SD (eds.): Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 99-122.

6. Allen VL , Wilder DA : Social comparison, self evaluation, and conformity to the group, in Suls JM , Miller RL (eds.): Social Comparison Processes. New York, Hemisphere, 1977, pp. 187-208.

7. Rogers E : Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press, 1995.

8. Glanz K , Sorensen G , Farmer A : The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs. Am J Health Promot 10:453-470, 1996.

9. U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1990 Census of Population, Social and Economic Characteristics. Washington, DC, Department of Commerce, 1990.

10.

10. Morrill C. The executive way: Conflict management in corporations. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995.

11.

11. Buller DB , Morrill C , Taren D , Aickin M , Sennott-Miller L , Buller MK , Larkey L , Alatorre C , Wentzel TM : Randomized trial testing the effect of peer education at increasing fruit and vegetable intake. JNCI 91:43-52, 1999.

12.

12. Morrill C , Buller DB , Buller MK , Larkey LK : Toward an organizational perspective on identifying and managing formal gatekeeping. Qualitative Sociol 22:51-72, 1999.

13.

13. Larkey LK , Alatorre C , Buller DB , Morrill C , Buller MK , Taren D , Sennott-Miller L : Communication strategies for a dietary intervention in a worksite peer education intervention. Health Educ Res, in press.

14.

14. Altpeter M , Earp JAL , Bishop C , Eng E : Lay health advisor activity levels: Definitions from the field. Health education Behav 26:495-512, 1999.

15.

15. Suarez L , Lloyd L , Weiss N , Rainbolt T , Pulley L : Effect of social networks on cancer-screening behavior of older Mexican-American women. JNCI 86:775-779, 1994.