Although resources are available to inform researchers of the many technical skills necessary to conduct qualitative research, individuals working in applied field settings often encounter ethical, moral, and sociopolitical dilemmas that cannot be resolved through the application of technical skills. The purpose of this article is to present examples of dilemmas faced by qualitative research methodologists studying sexual behavior in applied field settings. Possible solutions to these dilemmas are discussed within a theoretical and conceptual frame work. The examples and discussion are organized around four broad topic areas: informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, and personal relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Billy JOG, Tanfer K, Grady WR, Klepinger DH: The sexual behavior of men in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect25: 52-60, 1993.
2.
2. Catania JA, Coates TJ, Stall R, Turner H, Peterson J, Hearst N, et al: Prevalence of AIDS-related risk factors and condom use in the United States. Science258: 1101-1106, 1992.
3.
3. Ku L, Sonenstein FL, Pleck JH: Patterns of HIV risk and preventive behaviors among teenage men. Public Health Rep107: 131-138, 1993.
4.
4. Seal DW: Interpartner concordance of self-reported sexual behavior among college dating couples. J Sex Res34: 39-55, 1997.
5.
5. Catania JA, Coates TJ, Kegeles S: A test of the AIDS Risk Reduction Model: Psychosocial correlates of condom use in the AMEN cohort survey. Health Psychol13: 548-555, 1994.
6.
6. DiFranceisco W, Ostrow DG, Chmiel JS: Sexual adventurism, high-risk behavior, and human immunodeficiency virus-1 seroconversion among the Chicago MACS-CCS cohort, 1984 to 1992: A case-control study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases23: 453-460, 1996.
7.
7. Kelly JA, Kalichman SC, Kauth MR, Kilgore HG, Hood HV, Campos PE, et al: Situational factors associated with AIDS risk behavior lapses and coping strategies used by gay men who successfully avoid lapses. Am J Public Health81: 1335-1338, 1991.
8.
8. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Brasfield TL: Predictors of vulnerability to AIDS risk behavior relapse. J Consult Clin Psychol59: 163-166, 1991.
9.
9. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Stevenson LY, Hauth AC, Kalichman SC, Diaz YE, et al: Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: The effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities. Am J Public Health82: 1483-1489, 1992.
10.
10. Kelly JA, Murphy DA, Washington CD, Wilson TS, Koob JJ, Davis DR, et al: The effects of HIV/AIDS intervention groups for high-risk women in urban clinics. Am J Public Health84: 1918-1922, 1994.
11.
11. Kelly JA, Murphy DA, Sikkema KJ, McAuliffe TL, Roffman RA, Solomon LJ, et al: Outcomes of a randomized controlled community-level prevention intervention: Effects on behavior among at-risk gay men in small U.S. cities. The Lancet350: 1500-1505, 1998.
12.
12. Herdt G, Boxer AM: Ethnographic issues in the study of AIDS. J Sex Research28: 171-188, 1991.
13.
13. Bolton R: Rethinking anthropology: The study of AIDS, in Brummelhuis H, Herdt G (eds.): Culture and Sexual Risk: Anthropological Perspectives on AIDS. Australia, Gordon and Breach, 1995, pp. 285-313.
14.
14. Kelly JA, Kalichman SC: Increased attention to human sexuality research can improve HIVAIDS prevention efforts: Key research issues and directions. J Consult Clin Psychol63: 907-918, 1995.
15.
15. Odets W: AIDS education and prevention: Why it has gone almost completely wrong and some things we can do about it. Paper presented at the National Gay and Lesbian Health Conference, Houston, TX, July 1993.
16.
16. Bauman LJ, Adair EG: The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction. Health Educ Q19: 9-23, 1992.
17.
17. Cronbach L: Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol30: 116-127, 1975.
18.
18. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994.
19.
19. Morse JM: Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994.
20.
20. Wolcott HF: Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994.
21.
21. Punch M: Politics and ethics in qualitative research, in Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 83-97.
22.
22. Cowles K: Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. West J Nurs Res10: 163-179, 1988.
23.
23. Kavanaugh K, Ayres L: “Not as bad as it could have been”: Assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Res Nurs Health21: 91-97, 1998.
24.
24. Agar M: Stories, background knowledge and themes: Problems in the analysis of life history narrative. Am Ethnologist7: 223-235, 1980.
25.
25. LeCompte MD: A framework for hearing silence: What does telling stories mean when we are supposed to be doing science? in McLaughlin D, Tierney WG (eds.): Naming Silenced Lives. New York, Routledge, 1993, pp. 9-27.
26.
26. Lincoln YS: I and thou: Method, voice, and roles in research with the silenced, in McLaughlin D, Tierney WG (eds.): Naming Silenced Lives. New York, Routledge, 1993, pp. 29-50.
27.
27. Sandelowski M: Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS Adv Nurs Sci16(2): 1-8, 1993.
28.
28. Stanfield JH: Ethnic modeling in qualitative research, in Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 175-188.
29.
29. Lipson JG: Ethical issues in ethnography, in Morse JM (ed.): Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994.
30.
30. Seal DW: Conducting psychological research, in Hahn-Smith ST, Hodge GK, Nelson NH, Seal DW (eds.): Methods and Applications of Psychological Research (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA, Ginn Press, 1994, pp. 1-7.
31.
31. Cassell J, Wax ML: Editorial introduction: Toward a moral science of human beings. Social Problems27: 259-264, 1980.
32.
32. Munhall P: Ethical considerations in qualitative research. West J Nurs Res10: 150-161, 1988.
33.
33. Mann BJ: The ethics of fieldwork in an urban bar, in Rynkiewich MA, Spradley JP (eds.): Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp. 95-109.
34.
34. Fine GA: Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. J Contemporary Ethnography22: 267-294, 1993.
35.
35. Thorne B: “You still takin’notes?”: Fieldwork and problems of informed consent. Social Problems27: 284-297, 1980.
36.
36. Wax ML: Paradoxes of “consent” to the practice of fieldwork. Social Problems27: 272-283, 1980.
37.
37. Chrisman NJ: Secret societies and the ethics of urban fieldwork, in Rynkiewich MA, Spradley JP (eds.): Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp. 135-147.
38.
38. Diener E, Crandall R: Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1978.
39.
39. Cohen FG: The American Indian movement and the anthropologist: Issues and implications of consent, in Rynkiewich MA, Spradley JP (eds.): Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp. 81-94.
40.
40. Hansen JF: The anthropologist in the field: Scientist, friend, and voyeur, in Rynkiewich MA, Spradley JP (eds.): Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp. 123-134.
41.
41. Stevens PE, Tighe-Doerr B: Trauma of discovery: Women’s narratives of being informed they are HIV-infected. AIDS Care9: 523-538, 1997.
42.
42. Marcus G, Fischer M: Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986.
43.
43. Henriksson B, Månsson S: Sexual negotiations: An ethnographic study of men who have sex with men, in Brummelhuis H, Herdt G (eds.): Culture and Sexual Risk: Anthropological Perspectives on AIDS. Australia, Gordon and Breach, 1992, pp. 157-182.
44.
44. Ortiz KR: Mental health consequences of life history method: Implications from a refugee case. Ethos13: 99-120, 1985.
45.
45. Johnson CG: Risks in the publication of fieldwork, in Sieber JE (ed.): The Ethics of Social Research: Fieldwork, Regulation, and Publication. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp. 71-91.
46.
46. Campbell JC, Bunting S: Voices and paradigms: Perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci13: 1-15, 1991.
47.
47. Emerson RM, Pollner M: On the uses of members’responses to researchers’accounts. Human Organization47: 189-198, 1988.
48.
48. Kennedy EL, Davis MD: Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York, Routledge, 1993.
49.
49. Novick A: One small ethical issue arising in ethnographic research. AIDS and Public Policy Journal11: 115-117, 1996.
50.
50. Spradley JP: Trouble in the tank, in Rynkiewich MA, Spradley JP (eds.): Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp. 17-31.
51.
51. Anderson JM: Reflexivity in field work: Toward a feminist epistemology. Image J Nurs Sch23: 115-118, 1991.
52.
52. Geertz C: Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture, in Geertz C (ed.): The Interpretation of Culture. New York, Basic Books, 1973.
53.
53. Cassell J: Harms, benefits, wrongs, and rights in fieldwork, in Sieber JE (ed.): The Ethics of Social Research: Fieldwork, Regulation, and Publication. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp. 7-31.
54.
54. Tierney WG: Naming Silenced Lives. New York, Routledge, 1993.
55.
55. Sieber JE: Ethical dilemmas in social research, in Sieber JE (ed.): The Ethics of Social Research: Surveys and Experiments. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp. 1-29.
56.
56. Crapanzano V: The life history in anthropological field work. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly2: 3-7, 1981.
