This paper presents a systematic literature review of the works published on stress mindset during the foundational years before it experienced rapid growth, followed by a bibliometric analysis of all works published to date. Specifically, it reviews the temporal development of research on stress mindset, including the most dominant authors, primary scholarly sources, and top-cited works. Second, it lays the groundwork for the intellectual and social structures of stress mindset using co-citation and collaboration network analyses. Third, it employs keyword co-occurrence analysis to identify thematic clusters and topics that have been trending over the past 10 years. Finally, it uses thematic mapping to comment on how the various themes could be categorized based on their relevance and development in this important research domain. Overall, we have found that stress mindset in all its forms—as an antecedent, boundary condition, mechanism, and outcome—constitutes a fertile research area now witnessing exponential growth and rapidly transforming into an interdisciplinary construct. As such, this work promises to guide researchers interested in stress to make judicious choices when allocating their resources and efforts in pursuit of future knowledge.
AkinolaM.FridmanI.MorS.MorrisM. W.CrumA. J. (2016). Adaptive appraisals of anxiety moderate the association between cortisol reactivity and performance in salary negotiations. PLoS One, 11(12), Article e0167977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167977
3.
Al HajjR.VongasJ. G. (2025). Radical intrapersonal change: Three usual suspects, one unusual organizational context. Review of Managerial Science, 19(1), 255–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00747-z
4.
Al HajjR.VongasJ. G.JamalM.ElMelegyA. R. (2023). The essential impact of stress appraisals on work engagement. PloS One, 18(10), Article e0291676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291676
5.
Al IssaH. E.ThaiM. T. T.NguyenH. (2024). A systematic mapping of social entrepreneurship education: A call for increased collaboration, ethics, and research frameworks. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 101025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101025
6.
AriaM.CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Ben-AviN.TokerS.HellerD. (2018). “If stress is good for me, it’s probably good for you too”: Stress mindset and judgment of others’ strain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.002
BradfordS. C.EganM. E.SheraJ. H. (1953). Documentation (2nd edition). Crossby Lockwood.
12.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In RousseauD. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 112–129): Oxford Press.
13.
CasperA.SonnentagS.TremmelS. (2017). Mindset matters: The role of employees’ stress mindset for day-specific reactions to workload anticipation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(6), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1374947
14.
ChenX.ZouD.XieH.ChengG. (2021). Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 205–222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977868
15.
CorbetS.DowlingM.GaoX.HuangS.LuceyB.VigneS. A. (2019). An analysis of the intellectual structure of research on the financial economics of precious metals. Resources Policy, 63, Article 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101416
16.
CrumA. (2011). Evaluating a mindset training program to unleash the enhancing nature of stress. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 1–6). Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65870502
17.
CrumA. J.AkinolaM.MartinA.FathS. (2017). The role of stress mindset in shaping cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses to challenging and threatening stress. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 30(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1275585
18.
CrumA. J.AkinolaM.TurnwaldB. P.KaptchukT. J.HallK. T. (2018). Catechol-O-Methyltransferase moderates effect of stress mindset on affect and cognition. PLoS One, 13(4), Article e0195883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195883
CrumA. J.SaloveyP.AchorS. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031201
21.
CrumA. J.SantoroE.Handley-MinerI.SmithE. N.EvansK.MoravejiN.AchorS.SaloveyP. (2023). Evaluation of the “rethink stress” mindset intervention: A metacognitive approach to changing mindsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 152(9), 2603–2622. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001396
22.
CunillO. M.SalváA. S.GonzalezL. O.Mulet-FortezaC. (2019). Thirty-fifth anniversary of the International Journal of Hospitality Management: A bibliometric overview. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.013
DuckworthA. L.KimB.TsukayamaE. (2013). Life stress impairs self-control in early adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00608
25.
DweckC. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00612.x
26.
DweckC. S.YeagerD. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
27.
FindlayK.Janse van RensburgO. (2018). Using interaction networks to map communities on Twitter. International Journal of Market Research, 60(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785317753025
28.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136617
29.
GarveyA. M.GermannF.BoltonL. E. (2016). Performance brand placebos: How brands improve performance and consumers take the credit. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv094
30.
GibreelO.MostafaM. M.KinawyR. N.ElMelegyA. R.Al HajjR. (2025). Two decades of viral marketing landscape: Thematic evolution, knowledge structure and collaboration networks. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(2), Article 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100659
HoriuchiS.TsudaA.AokiS.YonedaK.SawaguchiY. (2018). Coping as a mediator of the relationship between stress mindset and psychological stress response: A pilot study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S150400
33.
JamiesonJ. P.CrumA. J.GoyerJ. P.MarottaM. E.AkinolaM. (2018). Optimizing stress responses with reappraisal and mindset interventions: An integrated model. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 31(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1442615
34.
JamiesonJ. P.MendesW. B.BlackstockE.SchmaderT. (2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015
35.
JamiesonJ. P.MendesW. B.NockM. K. (2013). Improving acute stress responses: The power of reappraisal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412461500
36.
JamiesonJ. P.NockM. K.MendesW. B. (2012). Mind over matter: Reappraising arousal improves cardiovascular and cognitive responses to stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(3), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025719
37.
KeechJ. J.HaggerM. S.O’CallaghanF. V.HamiltonK. (2018). The influence of university students’ stress mindsets on health and performance outcomes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 52(12), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay008
38.
KhanA.GoodellJ. W.HassanM. K.PaltrinieriA. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47, Article 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520
39.
KilbyC. J.ShermanK. A. (2016). Delineating the relationship between stress mindset and primary appraisals: Preliminary findings. SpringerPlus, 5, 336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1937-7
40.
KilbyC. J.ShermanK. A.WuthrichV. (2018). Towards understanding interindividual differences in stressor appraisals: A systematic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 135(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.001
41.
KlussmanK.LindemanM. I. H.NicholsA. L.LangerJ. (2021). Fostering stress resilience among business students: The role of stress mindset and self-connection. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1462–1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120937440
42.
KunischS.MenzM.BartunekJ. M.CardinalL. B.DenyerD. (2018). Feature topic at organizational research methods: How to conduct rigorous and impactful literature reviews?Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770750
43.
LazarusR. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. Springer.
44.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
45.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304
46.
MazzolaJ. J.DisselhorstR. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees? A critical review and meta‐analysis of the challenge‐hindrance model of stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
47.
MoedH. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer.
48.
MostafaM. M. (2023). Twenty years of Wikipedia in scholarly publications: A bibliometric network analysis of the thematic and citation landscape. Quality & Quantity, 57(6), 5623–5653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01626-7
49.
MukherjeeD.LimW. M.KumarS.DonthuN. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
50.
NorrisM.OppenheimC. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
51.
ParkD.YuA.MetzS. E.TsukayamaE.CrumA. J.DuckworthA. L. (2018). Beliefs about stress attenuate the relation among adverse life events, perceived distress, and self‐control. Child Development, 89(6), 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12946
52.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
53.
PerssonO.DanellR.SchneiderJ. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In ÅströmF.DanellR.LarsenB.SchneiderJ. (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 9–24). International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. https://www.issi-society.info/ollepersson60/
54.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
55.
SangWooH. (2016). Effect of general/job stress mindset to decrease the influence of job stress to burnout. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 19(11B), 5365–5372.
56.
Schmid MastM.LatuI. M. (2016). Interpersonal accuracy in relation to the workplace, leadership, and hierarchy. In HallJ. A.Schmid MastM.WestT. V. (Eds.), The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 270–286): Cambridge University Press.
57.
SchneidermanN.IronsonG.SiegelS. D. (2005). Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141
58.
SchwabeL.WolfO. T. (2010). Learning under stress impairs memory formation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2009.09.009
SheldonE.Simmonds-BuckleyM.BoneC.MascarenhasT.ChanN.WincottM.GleesonH.SowK.HindD.BarkhamM. (2021). Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 287, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054
61.
SongY.ChenX.HaoT.LiuZ.LanZ. (2019). Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 137, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002
62.
SuzukiS. (1997). Development of a new psychological stress response scale (SRS‐18) and investigation of the reliability and the validity. Japanese Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.11331/jjbm.4.22
63.
TartarJ. L.CabreraD.KnafoS.ThomasJ. D.AntonioJ.PeacockC. A. (2020). The “warrior” COMT Val/Met genotype occurs in greater frequencies in mixed martial arts fighters relative to controls. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 19(1), 38–42.
64.
TskhayK. O.RuleN. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 17(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312461308
65.
ÜlkerP.ÜlkerM.KaramustafaK. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of bibliometric studies in the field of tourism and hospitality. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(2), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-10-2021-0291
66.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In DingY.RousseauR.WolframD. (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
67.
WatsonD. L.TharpR. G. (2014). Self-directed behavior: Self-modification for personal adjustment (10th edition): Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
68.
ZaitouniM.HewapathiranaG.MostafaM.Al HajjR.ElMelegyA. R. (2024). Work-life balance: A landscape mapping of two decades of scholarly research. Heliyon, 10(14), Article e34084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34084
ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
