Associative attitude learning is typically viewed as a low-level process that automatically registers mere co-occurrences between stimuli, independent of their validity and relational meaning. This view invites to critically examine how attitude formation conforms to four operating conditions (i.e., unawareness, efficiency, goal independence, and uncontrollability) and two operating principles (i.e., unqualified registration of mere co-occurrences between stimuli and formation of direct stimulus–response links), which is the main purpose of the present contribution. The general discussion examines how contemporary attitude models endorse these conditions and principles. Overall, this contribution calls for (a) a nuanced understanding of the nature and scope of associative attitude learning, (b) a fine-grained understanding of how contemporary attitude models endorse conditions and principles reviewed here and find them relevant to their theorization of attitude formation, (c) a clarification of how direct and indirect evaluative measures relate to these conditions and principles, and (d) enhanced efforts in specifying contemporary attitude formation models.
ArcuriL.CastelliL.GaldiS.ZogmaisterC.AmadoriA. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29, 369-387.
2.
BaeyensF.EelenP.Van den BerghO.CrombezG. (1992). The content of learning in human evaluative conditioning: Acquired valence is sensitive to US-revaluation. Learning and Motivation, 23, 200-224.
3.
BaeyensF.VanhoucheW.CrombezG.EelenP. (1998). Human evaluative flavor-flavor conditioning is not sensitive to post-acquisition US-inflation. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 83-108.
4.
Bar-AnanY.De HouwerJ.NosekB. A. (2010). Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: A correlational investigation with large samples. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2313-2335.
5.
BarghJ. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In WyerR.SrullT. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social cognition. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BarghJ. A.MorsellaE. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 73-79.
7.
BlockN. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227-287.
BrainerdC. J.ReynaV. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164-169.
10.
BrooksJ. O.WatkinsM. J. (1989). Recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 968-976.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BerntsonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5-17.
12.
ChaikenS. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M.HermanC. P. (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CorneilleO.YzerbytV. Y.PleyersG.MussweilerT. (2009). Beyond awareness and resources: Evaluative conditioning may be sensitive to processing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 279-282.
14.
DaviesS. R.El-DeredyW.ZandstraE. H.BlanchetteI. (2012). Evidence for the role of cognitive resources in flavour-flavour evaluative conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2297-2308.
15.
DawsonM. E.RisslingA. J.SchellA. M.WilcoxR. (2007). Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion, 7, 755-766.
16.
DedonderJ.CorneilleO.BertinchampsD.YzerbytV. (2014). Overcoming correlational pitfalls: Experimental evidence suggests that evaluative conditioning occurs for explicit but not implicit encoding of CS–US pairings. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 250-257.
17.
DedonderJ.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.KuppensT. (2010). Evaluative conditioning of high-novelty stimuli does not seem to be based on an automatic form of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1118-1121.
18.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ.-P.NaccacheL.SackurJ.SergentC. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
19.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230-241.
20.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1-20. doi:10.3758/LB.37.1.1
21.
De HouwerJ.Barnes-HolmesD.MoorsA. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 631-642.
22.
EdwardsK. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202-216.
23.
ErdfelderE.AuerT.-S.HilbigB. E.AßfalgA.MoshagenM.NadarevicL. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
24.
FazioR. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press.
25.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 639-656.
26.
FieldA. P.MooreA. C. (2005). Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 217-243.
27.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 534-540.
28.
FrieseM.HofmannW.SchmittM. (2009). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285-338.
29.
FrieseM.HofmannW.WänkeM. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397-419.
30.
FulcherE. P.HammerlM. (2001). When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 524-549.
31.
GastA.De HouwerJ. (2012). Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1657-1674.
32.
GastA.LangerS.SengewaldM.-A. (2016). Evaluative conditioning increases with temporal contiguity: The influence of stimulus order and stimulus interval on evaluative conditioning. Acta Psychologica, 170, 177-185. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.002
33.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011a). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 89-110.
34.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011a). I like it because I said that I like it: Evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 466-476.
35.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011b). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 89-110.
36.
GawronskiB.BalasR.CreightonL. A. (2014). Can the formation of conditioned attitudes be intentionally controlled?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 419-432.
37.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
38.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2009). Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 207-208.
39.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59-127.
40.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2014). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Operating principles and operating conditions of evaluation. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 188-203). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
GawronskiB.BrannonS. M.BodenhausenG. V. (2017). The associative-propositional duality in the representation, formation, and expression of attitudes. In DeutschR.GawronskiB.HofmannW. (Eds.), Reflective and impulsive determinants of human behavior (pp. 103-118). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
42.
GawronskiB.GastA.De HouwerJ. (2015). Is evaluative conditioning really resistant to extinction? Evidence for changes in evaluative judgements without changes in evaluative representations. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 816-830.
43.
GawronskiB.HeyckeT. (2017, October). Associative and propositional processes in evaluative conditioning: A multinomial modeling approach. In CorneilleO. (Chair), Latest advances in the dual process approach to attitude learning: Testing associative and propositional processes in the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Symposium conducted at the Society of Experimental Social Psychology Conference, Boston, MA, USA.
44.
GawronskiB.MitchellD. G.BalasR. (2015). Is evaluative conditioning really uncontrollable? A comparative test of three emotion-focused strategies to prevent the acquisition of conditioned preferences. Emotion, 15, 556-568.
45.
GawronskiB.WaltherE. (2012). What do memory data tell us about the role of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 617-623.
46.
GawronskiB.WaltherE.BlankH. (2005). Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: Cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 618-626.
47.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
48.
GreenwaldA. G.De HouwerJ. (2017). Unconscious conditioning: Demonstration of existence and difference from conscious conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(12), 1705-1721.
49.
HahnA.JuddC. M.HirshH. K.BlairI. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369-1392.
50.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
51.
HerrmannJ.-L.CorneilleO.DerbaixC.KachaM.WalliserB. (2014). Implicit sponsorship effects for a prominent brand. European Journal of Marketing, 48, 785-804.
52.
HeyckeT.AustF.StahlC. (2017). Subliminal influence on preferences? A test of evaluative conditioning for brief visual conditioned stimuli using auditory unconditioned stimuli. Royal Society Open Science, 4(9), 160935.
53.
HeyckeT.GehrmannS.HaafJ.StahlC. (2018). Of two minds or one? A registered replication of Rydell et al. (2006). Cognition and Emotion. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1429389
54.
HeyckeT.StahlC. (2018). Evaluative conditioning for brief visual conditioned stimuli and auditory unconditioned stimuli depends on CS visibility. Manuscript in preparation.
55.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390-421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
56.
HofmannW.GschwendnerT.FrieseM.WiersR. W.SchmittM. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962-977.
57.
HögdenF.HütterM.UnkelbachC. (2017). Does evaluative conditioning depend on awareness? Evidence from a continuous flash suppression paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/xlm0000533.
58.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 17-32.
59.
HütterM.De HouwerJ. (2017). Examining the contributions of memory-dependent and memory-independent components to evaluative conditioning via instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 49-58.
60.
HütterM.KlauerK. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 116-159.
61.
HütterM.SweldensS. (2013). Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: Contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 638-643.
62.
HütterM.SweldensS. (2018). Dissociating controllable and uncontrollable effects of affective stimuli on attitudes and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, ucx124, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx124. Manuscript under revision.
63.
HütterM.SweldensS.StahlC.UnkelbachC.KlauerK. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 539-557.
64.
JacobyL. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
65.
JacobyL. L.TothJ. P.YonelinasA. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
66.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933-948. doi:10.1037/a0014747
67.
JonesC. R.OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2010). Evaluative conditioning: The “how” question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 205-255.
68.
JonesC. R.VilenskyM. R.VaseyM. W.FazioR. H. (2013). Approach behavior can mitigate predominately univalent negative attitudes: Evidence regarding insects and spiders. Emotion, 13, 989-996.
69.
KattnerF. (2012). Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: Evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 166-175.
70.
KawakamiK.PhillsC. E.SteeleJ. R.DovidioJ. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957-971.
71.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
72.
LähteenmäkiM.HyönäJ.KoivistoM.NummenmaaL. (2015). Affective processing requires awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 339-365.
73.
LangerT.WaltherE.GawronskiB.BlankH. (2009). When linking is stronger than thinking: Associative transfer of valence disrupts the emergence of cognitive balance after attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1232-1237.
74.
LeDouxJ. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
75.
LeeA. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255-1266.
76.
LippO. V.PurkisH. M. (2006). The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: Implications for the extinction of evaluative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 431-440.
77.
LoerschC.McCaslinM. J.PettyR. E. (2011). Exploring the impact of social judgeability concerns on the interplay of associative and deliberative attitude processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1029-1032.
78.
LovibondP. F.ShanksD. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
79.
MatlinM. W. (1971). Response competition, recognition, and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 295-300.
80.
McConnellA. R.RydellR. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model: A dual-systems approach to attitudes. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 204-217). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
81.
McConnellA. R.RydellR. J.StrainL. M.MackieD. M. (2008). Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: Social group association cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 792-807.
82.
MelchersK.LachnitH.ShanksD. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 25-53.
83.
MieropA.HütterM.CorneilleO. (2017). Resource availability and explicit memory largely determine evaluative conditioning effects in a paradigm claimed to be conducive to implicit attitude acquisition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 758-767.
84.
MieropA.HütterM.StahlC.CorneilleO. (2018). Implicit memory is equally sensitive to CS pairings with mild or intense USs in a sequential EC paradigm: No support for the affect misattribution account. Cognition and Emotion. doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1435505
85.
MieropA.MoletM.CorneilleO. (2018). Does extinction in evaluative conditioning require evaluative responses during extinction training? Manuscript in preparation.
86.
MitchellC. J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183-198.
87.
MoorsA. (2016). Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 263-287.
88.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
89.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY. (2013). The effect of object-valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 743-752.
90.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2015). Processing goals moderate the effect of co-occurrence on automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 157-162.
91.
MurphyS. T.MonahanJ. L.ZajoncR. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 589-602.
92.
MussweilerT.DamischL. (2008). Going back to Donald: How comparisons shape judgmental priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1295-1315.
93.
NewellB. R.ShanksD. R. (2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 103-118.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413-417.
96.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
97.
PessoaL.AdolphsR. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773-783.
98.
PetersK. R.GawronskiB. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 557-569.
99.
PettyR. E.BrinolP. (2006). A metacognitive approach to “implicit” and “explicit” evaluations: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychology Bulletin, 132, 740-744.
100.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM)of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657-686.
101.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York, NY: Springer.
102.
PhillsC. E.KawakamiK.TabiE.NadolnyD.InzlichtM. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210.
103.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.LuminetO.YzerbytV. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130-144.
104.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.LuminetO. (2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279-285.
105.
RatcliffR.Van ZandtT.McKoonG. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-374. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.352
106.
RolandN.MieropA.FrenayM.CorneilleO. (2018). Field-identification IAT predicts students’ academic persistence over and above theory of planned behaviour determinants. Manuscript under revision at Frontline Learning Research.
107.
RosochaA.BalasR. (2017). Evaluative conditioning: Can we have inconsistent attitudes? An attempt of partial replication of Rydell et al. Psychologia Spoeczna, 12, 42256-42267.
108.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995-1008.
109.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.MackieD. M. (2008). Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes: Cognitive dissonance and increased information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1526-1532.
110.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.MackieD. M.StrainL. M. (2006). Of two minds: Forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 954-958.
111.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.StrainL. M.ClaypoolH. M.HugenbergK. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 867-878.
112.
ShanksD. R. (2005). Implicit learning. In LambertsK.GoldstoneR. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 202-220). London, England: SAGE.
113.
ShanksD. R. (2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273-301.
114.
ShanksD. R. (2017). Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 752-775. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1170-y
115.
SmithE. R.DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
116.
StahlC.HaafJ.CorneilleO. (2016). Subliminal evaluative conditioning? Above-chance CS identification may be necessary and insufficient for attitude learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1107-1131.
117.
StahlC.HeyckeT. (2016). Evaluative conditioning with simultaneous and sequential pairings under incidental and intentional learning conditions. Social Cognition, 34, 382-412.
118.
StahlC.UnkelbachC.CorneilleO. (2009). On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 404-420.
119.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
120.
SweldensS. (2018, January19). Putting operating principles (what) before conditions (how and when) to improve theorizing: S–S versus S–R learning in evaluative conditioning. Retrieved from osf.io/bu4v5
121.
SweldensS.CorneilleO.YzerbytV. (2014). The role of awareness in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 187-209.
122.
SweldensS.Van OsselaerS. M.JaniszewskiC. (2010). Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 473-489.
123.
SzpunarK. K.SchellenbergG.PlinerP. (2004). Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 370-381.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2015). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects. Experimental Psychology, 62, 161-169.
126.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.RoetsA.GastA. (2016). Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 1-15.
127.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.SmithC. T. (in press). Relational information moderates approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation. Acta Psychologica, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.016.
128.
Van DesselP.MartensG.SmithC. T.De HouwerJ. (2017). The mere exposure instruction effects: Mere exposure instructions influence liking. Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 299-314.
129.
WaltherE. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919-934.
130.
WaltherE.GawronskiB.BlankH.LangerT. (2009). Changing likes and dislikes through the back door: The US-revaluation effect. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 889-917.
131.
WaltherE.NagengastB.TrasselliC. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 175-196.
132.
WangM. Y.ChangH. C. (2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 1055-1078.
133.
WardleS. G.MitchellC. J.LovibondP. F. (2007). Flavor evaluative conditioning and contingency awareness. Learning & Behavior, 35, 233-241.
134.
WhittleseaB. W.PriceJ. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 234-246.
135.
WilsonT. D.LindseyS.SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
136.
WoudM. L.MaasJ.BeckerE. S.RinckM. (2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach–avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738-744.
137.
ZajoncR. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228.
138.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA. (2012). Context effects in evaluative conditioning of implicit evaluations. Learning and Motivation, 43, 155-165.
139.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2105-2122.
