This meta-analysis summarizes the results of research on the relationships of majority group members’ endorsement of assimilation, colorblindness, multiculturalism, and the relative relationships of colorblindness and multiculturalism to ethnic prejudice. Random effects analyses found that assimilation was positively related to explicit prejudice (g. = 0.80), multiculturalism was negatively related to both explicit (g. = −0.26) and implicit prejudice (g. = −0.19), and colorblindness was negatively related to explicit prejudice (g. = −0.07). Multiculturalism was more closely associated with low prejudice than colorblindness (g. = 0.15). Effect sizes varied as a function of methodology (experimental vs. correlational), country in which research was conducted (United States vs. other countries), and, in experimental studies of multiculturalism, type of prime used (abstract vs. concrete). Discussion points include methodological issues, groups used as targets of prejudice, national diversity norms, additional issues raised in the studies reviewed, and directions for future research.
ApfelbaumE. P.NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2012). Racial color blindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 205-209. doi:10.1177/0963721411434980
2.
AwadG.JacksonK. M. (2016). The measurement of color-blind racial ideology. In NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. (Eds.), The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact (pp. 141-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14754-009
3.
AxtJ. R. (2017). The best way to measure explicit racial attitudes is to ask about them. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.11771948550617728995
4.
AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.NosekB. B. A. (2014). The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age. Psychological Science, 25, 1804-1815. doi:10.1177/095679761453801
5.
*BandowL. A. (2014). Effects of diversity training ideology on intergroup attitudes: Comparing colorblind, multicultural, and all-inclusive multicultural approaches (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. AAI1554096)
6.
BeckerB. J. (2005). Failsafe N or file-drawer number. In RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch7
7.
*BerryJ. W.KalinR. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 301-320. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.301
8.
BezrukovaK.JehnK. A.SpellK. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 207-227. doi:10.5465/amle.2008.0090
9.
BezrukovaK.SpellC. S.PerryJ. L.JehnK. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1222-1274. doi:10.1037/bul0000067
10.
BishopD. V. M.ThompsonP. A. (2016). Problems in using p-curve analysis and text mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value. PeerJ, 4, e1715. doi:10.7717/peerj.1715
11.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2017). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
BrehmJ. W.BrehmS. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
15.
BrewerM. B. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90-110). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In MillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17.
CarterE.SchönbrodtF.GervaisW. M.HilgardJ. (2017). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/9h3nu
18.
CarverC. S. (1989). How should multifaceted personality constructs be tested? Issues illustrated by self-monitoring, attributional style, and hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 577-585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.577
19.
*CelesteL.BrownR.TipL. K.MateraC. (2014). Acculturation is a two-way street: Majority-minority perspectives of outgroup acculturation preferences and the mediating role of multiculturalism and threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 304-320. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.10.002
20.
ChowR. M.KnowlesE. D. (2016). Taking race off the table: Agenda setting and support for color-blind public policy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 25-39. doi:10.1177/0146167215611637
21.
CohenJ. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
CookR. D. (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics, 19, 15-18. doi:10.2307/1268249
23.
CookR. D.WeisbergS. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70, 1-10. doi:10.1093/biomet.70.1.1
24.
*CorrellJ.ParkB.SmithJ. A. (2008). Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 471-491. doi:10.1177/1368430208095401
25.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
26.
DanboldF.HuoY. J. (2015). No longer “all-American”? Whites’ defensive reactions to their numerical decline. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 210-218. doi:10.1177/1948550614546355
27.
DeeksJ. J.HigginsJ. P. T.AltmanD. G. (2008). Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In HigginsJ. P. T.GreenS. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 243-296). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
28.
DeMarreeK. G.MorrisonK. R.WheelerS. C.PettyR. E. (2011). Self-ambivalence and resistance to subtle self-change attempts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 674-686. doi:10/0146167211400097
29.
*DizeC. B. (2010). Contemporary racial attitudes as predictive of Whites’ responses to discrimination against Blacks. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B, Sciences and Engineering, 72, 3134.
30.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
31.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
32.
ForscherP. S.CoxW. T. L.GraetzN.DevineP. G. (2015). The motivation to express prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 791-812. doi:10.10.37/pspi0000030
33.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.BankerB. S.RustM. C.NierJ. A.MottolaG. R.WardC. M. (1997). Does racism necessarily mean anti-Blackness? Aversive racism and pro-Whiteness. In FineM.PowellL.WeisL.WardC. M. (Eds.), Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (pp. 167-178). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
*GeschkeD.MummendeyA.KesslerT.FunkeF. (2010). Majority members’ acculturation goals as predictors and effects of attitudes and behaviours towards migrants. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 489-506. doi:10.1348/01446609X470544
35.
*GielingM.ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2014). Dutch adolescents’ tolerance of Muslim immigrants: The role of assimilation ideology, intergroup contact, and national identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 155-165. doi:10.1111/jasp.12220
36.
GreenwaldA. G.PettigrewT. F. (2014). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69, 669-684. doi:10.1037/a0036056
37.
*GuimondS.CrispR. J.De OliveiraP.KamiejskiR.KteilyN.KuepperB.. . . ZickA. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 941-958. doi:10.1037/a0032069
38.
GuimondS.de la SablonnièreR.NugierA. (2014). Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 142-188. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.957578
39.
*HachfeldA.HahnA.SchroederS.AndersY.StanatP.KunterM. (2011). Assessing teachers’ multicultural and egalitarian beliefs: The Teacher Cultural Beliefs Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 986-996. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.006
40.
*HahnA.BanchefskyS.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: Positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 12646-11664. doi:10.1177/0146167215607351
41.
HahnA.JuddC. M.ParkB. (2010). Thinking about group differences: Ideologies and national identities. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 120-126. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2010.483997
42.
HallE. V.PhillipsK. W.TownsendS. S. M. (2015). A rose by any other name? The consequences of subtyping “African-Americans” from “Blacks.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 183-190. doi:10.1016//j.jesp.2014.10.004
43.
*HindriksP.VerkuytenM.CoendersM. (2014). Dimensions of social dominance orientation: The roles of legitimizing myths and national identification. European Journal of Personality, 28, 538-549. doi:10.1002/per.1955
44.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrated model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_03
45.
JacksonM. C.WildeV. K.GoffP. A. (2016). Seeing color blindness: Color-blind racial ideology research methods in social psychology. In NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. (Eds.), The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact (pp. 125-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14754-008
46.
JohnO. P.Benet-MartínezV. (2014). Measurement: Reliability, construct validity, and scale construction. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 473-503). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
*KamiejskiR.GuimongS.De OliveiraP.Er-RafiyA.BrauerM. (2012). Le modèle républicain d’intégration: Implications pour la psychologie des relations entre groupes [The republican model of integration: Implications for the psychology of intergroup relations]. L’année Psychologique, 112, 49-83. doi:10.4074/S0003503312001030
48.
*KarafantisD. M.Pierre-LouisJ.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (2010). A comparison of the multicultural and color blind perspectives on the intergroup attitudes of college students. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20, 688-710. doi:10.1080/10911351003751876
49.
*KauffM.AsbrockF.ThörnerS.WagnerU. (2013). Side effects of multiculturalism: The interaction effect of a multicultural ideology and authoritarianism on prejudice and diversity beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 305-320. doi:10.1177/0146167212473160
50.
KeithK. D. (2011). Introduction to cross-cultural psychology. In KeithK. D. (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 3-19). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
51.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.HoganC. M.ChowR. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 857-869. doi:10.1037/a0013595
52.
*LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS. A.CerrutiC.ShinJ.-E.Joy-GabaJ. A.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765-1785. doi:10.1037/a0036260
53.
*LaiC. K.SkinnerA. L.CooleyE.MurrarS.BrauerM.DevosT.. . . NosekB. A. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1001-1016. doi:10.1037/xge0000179
54.
*LaiC. K.SmythF. L.NosekB. A. (2014). Multiculturalism, color-blindness, and the Implicit Association Test. Unpublished manuscript, Project Implicit, Harvard University.
55.
LegaultL.GutsellJ. N.InzlichtM. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472-1477. doi:10.1177/0956797611427918
56.
*LevinS.MatthewsM.GuimondS.SidaniusJ.PrattoF.KteilyN.. . . DoverT. (2012). Assimilation, multiculturalism, and colorblindness: Mediated and moderated relationships between social dominance orientation and prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 207-212. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.019
57.
*LjujicV.VedderP.DekkerH.van GeelM. (2012). Serbian adolescents’ Romaphobia and their acculturation orientations towards the Roma minority. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 53-61. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.015
58.
LolliotS.FellB.SchmidK.WölferR.SwartH.VociA.. . . HewstoneM. (2015). Measures of intergroup contact. In BoyleG. J.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychology constructs (pp. 652-683). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
59.
MacDonaldT. K.ZannaM. P. (1998). Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 427-441. doi:10/0146167298244009
60.
*MahfudY.BadeaC.N’GbalaA. (2015). Distance culturelle et préjugés à l’égard des immigrés en France: Le rôle des modèles d’intégration [Cultural distance and prejudice against immigrants in France: The role of integration models]. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale, 28(2), 53-79.
61.
MarkusH. R.SteeleC. M.SteeleD. M. (2000). Colorblindness as a barrier to inclusion: Assimilation and nonimmmigrant minorities. Daedalus, 129, 233-259.
62.
MazzoccoP. J. (2017). The psychology of racial colorblindness: A critical review. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
*MazzoccoP. J.CooperL. W.FlintM. (2011). Different shades of racial colorblindness: The role of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 167-178. doi:10.1177/1368430211424763
64.
McClellandG. H. (2014). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 608-626). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
MeeusJ.DuriezB.VanbeselaereN.BoenE. (2010). The role of national identity representation in the relation between in-group identification and out-group derogation: Ethnic versus civic representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 305-320. doi:10.1348/014466609X451455
66.
Migrant Integration Policy Index. (2015). Migrant integration policy index 2015. Available from www.mipex.eu
67.
MillerN. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00267
68.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.469
69.
MonteithM. J.ParkerL. R.BurnsM. D. (2016). The self-regulation of prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 409-432). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
70.
*MorrisonK. R.ChungA. H. (2011). “White” or “European American”? Self-identifying labels influence majority group members’ interethnic attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 165-170. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.019
71.
*MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1648-1661. doi:10.1177/0146167210386118
72.
NelsonT. D. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
73.
NevilleH. A.AwadG. H.BrooksJ. E.FloresM. P.BluemelJ. (2013). Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 455-466. doi:10.1037/a0033282
74.
NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. (Eds.). (2016). The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
75.
*NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 59-70. doi:10.1037//0022-1647.47.1.59
76.
*Ng Tseung-WongC.VerkuytenM. (2018). Diversity ideologies and intergroup attitudes: When multiculturalism is beneficial for majority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 336-350. doi:10.1177/1368430216663021
77.
*ParkB.JuddC. M. (2005). Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 108-130. doi10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2
78.
*PedersenA.ParadiesY.BarndonA. (2015). The consequences of intergroup ideologies and prejudice control for discrimination and harmony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 684-696. doi:10.1111/jasp.12330
79.
*Pelletier-DumasM.de la SablonnièreR.GuimondS. (2017). The role of assimilation and multiculturalism for the relation between social dominance orientation and prejudice: The case of Anglophones and Francophones in Québec. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 874-891. doi:10.1177/0022022117706414
80.
*PerryR.ParadiesY.PedersenA. (2015). Religious ambivalence: Suppression of pro-social attitudes toward asylum seekers by right-wing authoritarianism. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25, 230-246. doi:10.1080/10508619.2014.921473
81.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
82.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
83.
*PfafferottI.BrownR. (2006). Acculturation preferences of majority and minority adolescents in Germany in the context of society and family. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 703-717. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.03.005
84.
*PieterseA. L.UtseyS. O.MillerM. J. (2016). Development and initial validation of the Anti-Racism Behavioral Inventory (ARBI). Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29, 356-381. doi:10.1080/09515070.2015.1101534
85.
PlantE. A.DevineP. C. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486-501. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1478
86.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444-446. doi:10.111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
87.
*PoteatV. P.SpaniermanL. B. (2012). Modern racism attitudes among White students: The role of dominance and authoritarianism and the mediating effects of racial color-blindness. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 758-774. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.700966
88.
RattanA.AmbadyN. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 12-21. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1892
89.
*RichesonJ. A.NussbaumR. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417-423. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.02
90.
*RiosK.WynnA. N. (2016). Engaging with diversity: Framing multiculturalism as learning opportunity reduces prejudice among high White American identifiers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 854-865. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2196
91.
*RoetsA.AuE. W. M.Van HielA. (2015). Can authoritarianism lead to greater liking of out-groups? The intriguing case of Singapore. Psychological Science, 26, 1972-1974. doi:10.1177/0956797615605271
92.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2010). The colorblind, multicultural, and polycultural ideological approaches to improving intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 215-246. doi:10.1111/j.1715-2409.2010.01022.x
93.
*RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2012). The relation between polyculturalism and intergroup attitudes among racially and ethnically diverse adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 1-16. doi:10.1037/a0026490
94.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2013). Thinking about mutual influences and connections across culture relates to more positive intergroup attitudes: An examination of polyculturalism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 547-558. doi:10.1111/spc3.12043
95.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R.MilitanoM. (2014). Polyculturalism and sexist attitudes: Believing cultures are dynamic relates to lower sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 519-534. doi:10.1177/0361684313510152
96.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R.MossI. (2012). Polyculturalism and openness about criticizing one’s culture: Implications for sexual prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 149-165. doi:10.1177/1368430211412801
97.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
98.
*RyanC. S.CasasJ. F.ThompsonB. K. (2010). Interethnic ideology, intergroup perceptions, and cultural orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 29-44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01631.x
99.
*RyanC. S.HuntJ. S.WeibleJ. A.PetersonC. R.CasasJ. F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 617-637. doi:10.1177/1368430207084105
100.
SasakiS. J.VorauerJ. D. (2013). Ignoring versus exploring differences between groups: Effects of salient color-blindness and multiculturalism on intergroup attitudes and behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 246-259. doi:10.1111/spsc3.12021
SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103.
SteindlC.JonasE.SittenthalerS.Traut-MauttauschE.GreenbergJ. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223, 205-214. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
104.
*TawaJ.MaR.KatsumotoS. (2016). “All lives matter”: The cost of colorblind racial attitudes in diverse social networks. Race and Social Problems, 8, 196-208. doi:10.1007/s12662-016-9171-z
105.
ToddA. R.BurgmerP. (2013). Perspective taking and automatic intergroup evaluation change: Testing an associative self-anchoring account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 786-802. doi:10.1077/a0031999
106.
*UrbiolaA.WillisG. B.Ruiz-RomeroJ.MoyaM.EssesV. (2017). Valuing diversity in Spain and Canada: The role of multicultural ideology in intergroup attitudes and intentions to reduce inequalities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 56, 25-38. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.10.006
107.
*Valasco GonzálezK.VerkuytenM.WeesieJ.PoppeE. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667-686. doi:10.1348/4466608X284443
108.
*van DickR.WagnerU.AdamsC.PetzelT. (1997). Einstellungen zur Akkulturation: Erste Evaluation eines Fragenbogens an sechs deutschen Stichproben [Attitudes toward acculturation: Initial evaluation of a questionnaire administered to six German samples]. Gruppendynamic, 28, 83-92.
109.
Van HielA.MervieldeI. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00250.x
110.
*VedderP.WeninkE.van GeelM. (2016). Explaining negative outgroup attitudes between native Dutch and Muslim youth in the Netherlands using the integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 53, 54-64. doi: j.ijintrel.2016.05.001
111.
*VerkuytenM. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121-138. doi:10.1037/0022-351488.1.121
112.
*VerkuytenM. (2011). Assimilation ideology and outgroup attitudes among ethnic majority members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 789-806. doi:10.1177/1368430211398506
113.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
114.
ViechtbauerW.CheungM. W.-L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 112-125. doi:10.1002/jsrm.11
115.
*VisintinE. P.GreenE. V. T.BakalovaD.ZografovaV. (2016). Identification and ethnic diversity underlie support for multicultural rights: A multilevel analysis in Bulgaria. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 51, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.12.006
116.
WangC. S.KuG.TaiK.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Stupid doctors and smart construction workers: Perspective-taking reduces stereotyping of both negative and positive targets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 430-436. doi:10.1177/1948550613504968
117.
*WestT. V.SchoenthalerA. (2017). Color-blind and multicultural strategies in medical settings. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 124-158. doi:10.1111/sipr.12029
118.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2006). Considering the tower of babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277-306. doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0014-8
119.
*WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635-654. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.635
120.
*YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2014). The devil is in the details: Abstract versus concrete construals of multiculturalism differentially impact intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 772-789. doi:10.1037/a0035830
121.
*YogeeswaranK.DaviesT.SibleyC. G. (2017). Janus-faced nature of colorblindness: Social dominance orientation moderates the relationship between colorblind beliefs and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 509-616. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2225
122.
*YogeeswaranK.GaudetA.DasguptaN. (2016). Framing national unity in terms of assimilation versus colorblindness has differential effects on attitudes toward ethnic minority co-nations versus immigrants. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
123.
*ZagefkaH.BinderJ.BrownR.KesslerT.MummendeyA.FunkeF.. . . MaquilA. (2014). The relationship between acculturation preferences and prejudice: Longitudinal evidence from majority and minority groups in three European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 578-589. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2044
124.
*ZagefkaH.BrownR. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171-188. doi:10.1002/ejsp.73
125.
*ZagefkaH.BrownR.BroquardM.MartinS. L. (2007). Predictors and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Belgium and Turkey: The role of acculturation preferences and economic competition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 153-169. doi:10.1348/1044666X111185
126.
*ZagefkaH.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of acculturation preferences on non-indigenous Chileans in relation to an indigenous minority: Longitudinal survey evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 558-575. doi:10.1002/ejsp.550
127.
*ZagefkaH.NigburD.GonzalezR.TipL. (2013). Why does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority members?International Journal of Psychology, 48, 60-68. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.729841
128.
*ZickA.KüpperB.HövermannA. (2011). Intolerance, prejudice and discrimination: A European report. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
129.
ZickA.PettigrewT. F.WagnerU. (2008). Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 233-251. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00660.x
130.
*ZickA.WagnerU.van DickR.PetzelT. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 541-557. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00228
