Although there is consensus that the intergroup ideology of multiculturalism is negatively related to prejudice and that assimilation is positively related to prejudice, research regarding the relationship of racial colorblindness to prejudice has produced mixed results. We investigated whether these mixed results might stem from colorblindness being a multifaceted construct despite typically being treated as unidimensional. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of items from existing measures revealed three factors—equality orientation, color evasion, and rejection of racial categorization—from which we created the Multidimensional Assessment of Racial Colorblindness (MARC). Four studies provided evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the MARC and found that its subscales were often differentially related to other variables, including prejudice. We also compared the MARC to another measure of colorblindness, the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). We discuss the implications of racial colorblindness as a multifaceted construct.
ApfelbaumE. P.NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2012). Racial color blindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434980
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.PaukerK.AmbadyN.SommersS. R.NortonM. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: When older children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012835
3.
AxtJ. R. (2018). The best way to measure explicit racial attitudes is to ask about them. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 896–906. https://doi.org/10.11771948550617728995
4.
BerghR.AkramiN. (2017). Generalized prejudice: Old wisdom and new perspectives. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 438–460). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.019
5.
BerghR.BrandtM. J. (2021). Mapping principal dimensions of prejudice in the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000360
6.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2017). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (5th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BrandtM. J.CrawfordJ. T. (2019). Studying a heterogeneous array of target groups can help us understand prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/09833721419830382
8.
BrandtM. J.ReynaC. (2014). To hate or love thy neighbor: The role of authoritarianism and traditionalism in explaining the link between fundamentalism and racial prejudice. Political Psychology, 35(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12077
9.
BrewerM. B. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90–110). Cambridge University Press.
10.
CarverC. S. (1989). How should multifaceted personality constructs be tested? Issues illustrated by self-monitoring, attributional style, and hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.577
11.
ChenF. F.HayesA.CarverC. S.LaurenceauJ.-P.ZhangZ. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x
12.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed). Earlbaum.
13.
CorrellJ.ParkB.SmithJ. A. (2008). Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208095401
14.
DaveyL. M.BobocelD. R.Son HingL. S.ZannaM. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 1(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10222148418210
15.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.UfkesE. G.SaguyT.PearsonA. R. (2016). Included but invisible? Subtle bias, common identity, and the darker side of “we.”Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 6–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12017
16.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
17.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.NicholsA. H.Di LeoneB. A. L. (2013). Anything but race: Avoiding racial discourse to avoid hurting you or me. Psychology, 4(3A), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.43A048
18.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
19.
GötzF. M.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483
20.
GuimondS.de la SablonnièreR.NugierA. (2014). Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 142–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.957578
21.
HachfeldA.HahnA.SchroederS.AndersY.KunterM. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001
22.
HahnA.BanchefskyS.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: Positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1646–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215607351
23.
HaleyH.SidaniusJ. (2006). The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(5), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205283442
HartmannD.CrollP. R.LarsonR.GerteisJ.ManningA. (2017). Colorblindness as identity: Key determinants, relations to ideology, and implications for attitudes about race and policy. Sociological Perspectives, 60(5), 866–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719694
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
28.
JohnO. P.SotoC. J. (2007). The importance of being valid: Reliability and the process of construct validation. In RobinsR. W.FarleyC. R.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research in personality psychology (pp. 461–494). Guilford Press.
29.
KanterJ. W.WilliamsM. T.KuczynskiA. M.CoreyM. D.ParigorisR. M.CareyC. M.ManbeckK. E.WallaceE. C.RosenD. C. (2020). The measurement and structure of microaggressive communications by White people against Black people. Race and Social Problems, 12, 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-020-09298-w
30.
KeumB. T.MillerM. J.LeeM.ChenG. A. (2018). Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale for Asian Americans: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance across generational status. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000100
31.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (2016). Psychology of prejudice and discrimination (3rd ed.). Routledge.
32.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (2018). Principles of research in behavioral science (4th ed.). Routledge.
33.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.HoganC. M.ChowR. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1037.a0013595
34.
LaiK.GreenS. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
35.
LawsonK. M.RobinsR. W. (2021). Sibling constructs: What are they, why do they matter, and how should you handle them?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1117/108886321104101
36.
LeslieL. M.BonoJ. E.KimY. (S.)BeaverG. R. (2020). On melting pots and salad bowls: A meta-analysis of the effects of identity-blind and identity-conscious diversity ideologies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(5), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000446
37.
LevinS.MatthewsM.GuimondS.SidaniusJ.PrattoF.KteilyN.PitpitanE. V.DoverT. (2012). Assimilation, multiculturalism, and colorblindness: Mediated and moderated relationships between social dominance orientation and prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.019
38.
MazzoccoP. J.CooperL. W.FlintM. (2011). Different shades of racial colorblindness: The role of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211424763
39.
McConahayJ. B.HardeeB. B.BattsV. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278102500401
40.
MeeussenL.OttenS.PhaletK. (2014). Managing diversity: How leaders’ multiculturalism and colorblindness affect work group functioning. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214525809
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
43.
MonteithM. J.ParkerL. R.BurnsM. D. (2016). The self-regulation of prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 409–432). Psychology Press.
44.
MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386118
45.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G. (2020). Modern Homonegativity Scale. In MilhausenR. R.SakalukJ. K.FisherT. D.DavisC. M.YarberW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (4th ed., pp. 639–641). Routledge.
46.
NelsonJ. C.AdamsG.SalterP. S. (2012). The Marley hypothesis: Denial of racism reflects ignorance of history. Psychological Science, 24(2), 213–218. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612451466
47.
NevilleH. A.AwadG. H.BrooksJ. E.FloresM. P.BluemelJ. (2013). Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology. American Psychologist, 68(6), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033282
48.
NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-1647.47.1.59
49.
NichollsJ. G.LichtB. G.PearlR. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 9(3), 572–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.572
50.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.
51.
PerryR.ParadiesY.PedersenA. (2015). Religious ambivalence: Suppression of pro-social attitudes toward asylum seekers by right-wing authoritarianism. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.921473
52.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
53.
PlautV. C.CheryanS.StevensF. G. (2015). New frontiers in diversity research: Conceptions of diversity and their theoretical and practical implications. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (Vol. 1., pp. 593–619). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14341-019
PodsiadlowskiA.GröschkeD.KoglerM.SpringerC.van der ZeeK. (2013). Managing a culturally diverse workforce: Diversity perspectives in organizations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.09.001
56.
ReynaC. (2018). Scale creation, use, and misuse: How politics undermines measurement. In CrawfordJ. T.JussimL. (Eds.), The politics of social psychology (pp. 81–98). Routledge.
57.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
58.
RigdonE. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052
59.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2010). The colorblind, multicultural, and polycultural ideological approaches to improving intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1715-2409.2010.01022.x
60.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2012). The relation between polyculturalism and intergroup attitudes among racially and ethnically diverse adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026490
61.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R.MossI. (2012). Polyculturalism and openness about criticizing one’s culture: Implications for sexual prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211412801
62.
RyanC. S.HuntJ. S.WeibleJ. A.PetersonC. R.CasasJ. F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207084105
63.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2005). Over thirty years late: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2901(05)37002-X
64.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
65.
VittrupB. (2018). Color blind or color conscious? White American mothers’ approaches to racial socialization. Journal of Family Issues, 39(3), 668–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16676858
66.
WhitleyB. E.Jr.WebsterG. D. (2019). The relationships of intergroup ideologies to ethnic prejudice: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318761423
67.
WilliamsE. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 396–399. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983809
68.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
69.
YogeeswaranK.VerkuytenM.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2018). “I have a dream” of a colorblind nation? Examining the relationship between racial colorblindness, system justification, and support for policies that redress inequalities. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12269
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
