Many factors affect the solvability of homicides, including body disposal location and time between death and recovery. The aim of this exploratory study was to probe a number of spatiotemporal variables for trends across a subset of solved homicide case data from 54 North American serial killers, active between 1920 and 2016 (125 solved cases) to identify areas for further research. We investigated murder site and body disposal site as location variables with eight subcategories across eight discrete time series, seeking insight into how these factors may affect the early stages of an investigation and (therefore by inference) solvability. The findings showed that bodies recovered after 48 hours are more likely discovered outdoor while those discovered within 24 hours, within the victim’s residence. This has implications for the ability to recover forensic evidence when bodes are located after a prolonged time since death as well as in more hostile environments.
AddingtonL. A. (2006). Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767905285439
2.
AllsopC. (2017). The handbook of homicide. Willan Publishing.
3.
AndersonG. S. (2011). Comparison of decomposition rates and faunal colonization of carrion in indoor and outdoor environments. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01539.x
4.
BaskinD. R.SommersI. B. (2010). Crime-show-viewing habits and public attitudes toward forensic evidence: The “csi effect” revisited. Justice System Journal, 31(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2010.10767956
5.
BeauregardE.BouchardM. (2010). Cleaning up your act: Forensic awareness as a detection avoidance strategy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.09.004
6.
BeauregardE.MartineauM. (2014). No body, no crime? The role of forensic awareness in avoiding police detection in cases of sexual homicide. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.007
7.
BeauregardE.ProulxJ. (2002). Profiles in the offending process of nonserial sexual murderers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X02464002
8.
BeckwithS.MurakamiJ.ChapmanB. (2020). The persistence of semen on cotton fabric in various water environments. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1484164
9.
BordeY. M.TonnanyM. B.ChampodC. (2008). A study on the effects of immersion in river water and seawater on blood, saliva, and sperm placed on objects mimicking crime scene exhibits. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 41(3), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2008.10757172
10.
BrownK. M.KeppelR. D. (2007). Child abduction murder: An analysis of the effect of time and distance separation between murder incident sites on solvability. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00328.x
11.
BrownK. M.KeppelR. D. (2012). Child abduction murder: The impact of forensic evidence on solvability. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01970.x
12.
ChanH. C.HeideK. M.BeauregardE. (2011). What propels sexual murderers: A proposed integrated theory of social learning and routine activities theories. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10361317
13.
ChapmanB.KeatleyD.OatleyG.CoumbarosJ.MakerG. (2019). A review and recommendations for the integration of forensic expertise within police cold case reviews. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 10(2), 79–91.
14.
CockleD. L.BellL. S. (2015). Human decomposition and the reliability of a “Universal” model for post mortem interval estimations. Forensic Science International, 253, 136.e1–136.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.018
15.
CulattaE.Clay-WarnerJ.BoyleK. M.OshriA. (2020). Sexual revictimization: A routine activity theory explanation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(15–16), 2800–2824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517704962
16.
DiBiaseT. A. T. (2014). No-body homicide cases: A practical guide to investigating, prosecuting, and winning cases when the victim is missing. CRC Press.
17.
FergusonC. (2015). Staged homicides: An examination of common features of faked Burglaries, suicides, accidents and car accidents. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(3), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-014-9154-1
18.
FergusonC. E. (2011). The defects of the situation: An examination of staged crime scenes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bond University.
19.
FergusonC.PooleyK. (2019). Comparing solved and unsolved no-body homicides in Australia: An exploratory analysis. Homicide Studies, 23(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767919852381
20.
GodwinM. (1998). Victim target networks as solvability factors in serial murder. Social Behavior and Personality, 26(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.75
21.
HeinrickJ. (2006). Everyone’s an expert: The CSI effect’s negative impact on juries. The Triple Helix, 3(1), 59–61.
22.
LawsonT. F. (2009). Before the verdict and beyond the verdict: The CSI infection within modern criminal jury trials. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 41, 119.
23.
LeeS. J.ParkJ. (2018). Body transportation after homicides: Offender and offense characteristics. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(4), 1092–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13989
24.
LitwinK. J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803260269
25.
LitwinK. J.XuY. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767907300759
26.
MaederE. M.CorbettR. (2015). Beyond frequency: Perceived realism and the CSI effect. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2013.E44
27.
MaronoA. J.ReidS.YaksicE.KeatleyD. A. (2020). A behaviour sequence analysis of serial killers’ lives: From childhood abuse to methods of murder. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2019.1695517
28.
MicozziM. S. (1986). Experimental study of postmortem change under field conditions: Effects of freezing, thawing, and mechanical injury. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 31(3), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs11103j
29.
MouzosJ.MullerD. (2001). Solvability factors of homicide in Australia: An exploratory analysis in crime and criminal justice. Australian Institute of Criminology.
30.
NolanA.-N.MeadR. J.MakerG.SpeersS. J. (2019). A review of the biochemical products produced during mammalian decomposition with the purpose of determining the post-mortem interval. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1589571
31.
RealeK.BeauregardE. (2019). Body recovery after the “first 48”: Implications for sexual homicide investigations. Homicide Studies, 23(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767918795209
32.
Rhineberger-DunnG.BriggsS. J.RaderN. E. (2017). The CSI effect, DNA discourse, and popular crime dramas*. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12289
33.
RitchieG. T. (2005). A comparison of human decomposition in an indoor and an outdoor environment [Master’s thesis]. University of Tennessee. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2292
34.
RuttyG. N.HopwoodA.TuckerV. (2003). The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 117(3), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-002-0348-1
35.
SchroederH.KlotzbachH.OesterhelwegL.PüschelK. (2002). Larder beetles (Coleoptera, Dermestidae) as an accelerating factor for decomposition of a human corpse. Forensic Science International, 127(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00131-7
36.
SeaJ.BeauregardE.MartineauM. (2019). A cross-cultural comparison of Canadian and Korean sexual homicide. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(9), 1538–1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19834408
37.
SkinnerM.LazenbyR. A. (1983). Found! Human remains: A field manual for the recovery of the recent human skeleton. Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University.
38.
SPSS Inc. (2011). Statistics software (Version 24.0). SPSS Incorporated IBM Company.
39.
WellfordC.CroninJ. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multistate study. Justice Research and Statistics Association.
