Dead Reckoning: Unraveling How “Homicide” Cases Travel From Crime Scene to Court Using Qualitative Research Methods

Abstract

Drawing upon data gathered during a 4-year ethnographic study of homicide investigation in Britain, we document the movement of 44 (suspected) homicide cases through the criminal justice process before drawing upon two case studies to unravel in detail how a homicide is determined and how suspects are identified, eliminated, or charged. We suggest that the progress of homicide cases through this process is best understood as the outcome of a set of socially organized scientific, legal, and occupational sensemaking practices, collaboratively deployed by institutionally authorized actors. We conclude that these practices are rendered visible only through detailed qualitative research.

Keywords

homicide investigation sensemaking ethnography qualitative research forensic science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abolafia

M. Y.

(2010). Narrative construction as sensemaking: How a central bank thinks. Organization Studies, 31, 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357380

Association of Chief Police Officers. (2016). Murder investigation manual. http://library.college.police.uk/docs/APPREF/murder-investigation-manual-redacted.pdf

Atkinson

(1979). Societal reactions to suicide: The role of coroners’ definitions. In Cohen

(Ed.), Images of deviance (pp. 165–191). Penguin Books.

Barrett

(2009). The interpretation and exploitation of information in criminal investigations [PhD thesis]. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/353

British Society of Criminology. (2015). British Society of Criminology statement of ethics for researchers. https://www.britsoccrim.org/documents/BSCEthics2015.pdf

Brookman

(2015). Researching homicide offenders, offenses, and detectives using qualitative methods. In Copes

Mitchell Miller

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 236–252). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074701

Brookman

Innes

(2013). The problem of success: What is a “good” homicide investigation? Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 23(3), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.771538

Brookman

Maguire

(2019). What factors influence whether homicide cases are solved? Insights from qualitative research with detectives in Great Britain and the United States. Homicide Studies, 23(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767918793678

Brookman

Nolan

(2006). The dark figure of infanticide in England and Wales: Complexities of diagnosis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506288935

10.

Brown

A. D.

(2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604038182

11.

Brown

A. D.

Colville

Pye

(2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259

12.

Colville

Brown

A. D.

Pye

(2012). Simplexity: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. Human Relations, 65, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711425617

13.

Costa

(2017). Visibilities, invisibilities and twilight zones at the crime scene in Portugal. New Genetics and Society, 36, 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2017.1394835

14.

The Crown Prosecution Service. (2017). Coroners. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/coroners

15.

Dabney

Brookman

(2018). Fieldwork with homicide detectives: 60 minutes of reflections from a British and American criminologist. In Rice

S. K.

Maltz

M. D.

(Eds.), Doing ethnography in criminology: Discovery through fieldwork (pp. 91–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96316-7_9

16.

Emerson

Fretz

Shaw

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001

17.

Forensic Science Regulator. (2015). Guidance: Cognitive bias effects relevant to forensic science examinations (FSR-G-217). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510147/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix.pdf

18.

Fyfe

Stevenson

Woolnough

(2015). Missing persons: The processes and challenges of police investigation. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 25, 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.881812

19.

Garfinkel

(1963). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.

20.

Geertz

(1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

21.

Goffman

(1975). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Penguin Books. (Original work published 1974)

22.

Havard

(1960). The detection of secret homicide: A study of the medico-legal system of investigation of sudden and unexplained deaths. Macmillan.

23.

Hawk

Dabney

(2014). Are all cases treated equal? Using Goffman’s frame analysis to understand how homicide detectives orient to their work. The British Journal of Criminology, 54, 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu056

24.

Hicks

Tomlinson

(2001). Grey areas in diagnosing causes of death in children. In Christopher

(Ed.), Out of sight: NSPCC report on child deaths from abuse 1973 to 2000 (2nd ed., pp. 34–38). National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.

25.

Human Genetics Commission. (2009). Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? Balancing individual rights and the public interest in the governance and use of the National DNA Database. https://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/nov/uk-dna-human-genetics-commission.pdf

26.

Innes

(2002). The process structures of police homicide investigations. The British Journal of Criminology, 42, 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.669

27.

Innes

(2003). Investigating murder: Detective work and the police response to criminal homicide. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259427.001.0001

28.

Innes

(2007). Investigation order and major crime inquiries. In Newburn

Williamson

Wright

(Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 255–276). Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118177.ch10

29.

Innes

Brookman

(2013). Helping police with their enquiries: International perspectives on homicide investigation. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 23, 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.771542

30.

Jones

(2016). Fatal call—Getting away with murder: A study into influences of decision making at the initial scene of unexpected death [PhD thesis, University of Portsmouth].

31.

Kelty

Julian

Bruenisholz

Wilson-Wilde

(2018). Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations. Forensic Science International, 285, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.015

32.

Maitlis

Christianson

(2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177

33.

Neuilly

M.-A.

(2011). Impact of medico-legal practices on mortality statistics and their use in comparative research. Victims & Offenders, 63(3), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2011.581884

34.

Nic Daéid

. (2007). CPD, an effective means of professional development . . . Or is it? Science & Justice, 47, 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2007.09.008

35.

Roberts

(2018). Making sense of forensic science evidence. In Roberts

Stockdale

(Eds.), Forensic science evidence and expert witness testimony. Reliability through reform? (pp. 27–70). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111034.00008

36.

Ryle

(1971). Thinking and reflecting. In Ryle

(Ed.), Collected papers: Collected essays, 1929–1968 (Vol. 2, pp. 465–479). Hutchinson.

37.

Salet

(2017). Framing in criminal investigation: How police officers (re)construct a crime. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 90, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x16672470

38.

Simon

(2018). Minimizing error and bias in death investigations. Seton Hall Law Review, 49, 255–305.

39.

Spradley

(2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press. (Original work published 1979)

40.

Sudnow

(1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1965.12.3.03a00010

41.

Timmermans

(2005). Death brokering: Constructing culturally appropriate deaths. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00467.x

42.

van Oorschot

. (2014). Seeing the case clearly: File-work, material mediation, and visualizing practices in a Dutch criminal court. Symbolic Interaction, 37, 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.126

43.

Vlaar

P. W.

Van den Bosch

F. A.

Volberda

H. W.

(2006). Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: Using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies, 27, 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068338

44.

Weick

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE.

45.

Wilson-Kovacs

(2018). An ethnographic approach to researching the introduction of new forensic DNA technologies in policing in the United Kingdom. SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526445315