Homicide Investigations in Context: Exploring Explanations for the Divergent Impacts of Victim Race,Gender,Elderly Victims,and Firearms on Homicide Clearances

Abstract

Studies examining factors influencing homicide clearances have produced consistent findings for child victims, arguments, and incident location. Conclusions have been far more varied regarding the social location of the victim and incident attributes such as firearms. Using homicides reported to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) between 2008 and 2012, the current study uses Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations (CACC) to analyze combinations of victim and incident attributes most likely to lead to cleared homicides. In doing so, we assess the variable impacts of victim gender, race, elderly victims, and firearms across contexts to understand their inconsistent effects in the prior literature.

Keywords

NIBRS methodology clearance policing investigation solvability conjunctive analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addington

L. A.

(2006). Using National Incident-Based Reporting System murder data to evaluate clearance predictors. Homicide Studies, 10, 140-152.

Addington

L. A.

(2008). Assessing the extent of nonresponse bias on NIBRS estimates of violent crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(1), 32-49.

Baskin

Sommers

(2010). The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1141-1149.

Black

D. J.

(1970). Production of crime rates. American Sociological Review, 35, 733-748.

Black

D. J.

(1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Black

D. J.

(2015). The beginning of social time: An interview with myself. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43, 382-395.

Borg

M. J.

Parker

K. F.

(2001). Mobilizing law in urban areas: The social structure of homicide clearance rates. Law and Society Review, 435-466.

Braga

A. A.

Dusseault

(2018). Can homicide detectives improve clearance rates? Crime and Delinquency, 64, 283-315.

Burgess-Proctor

(2006). Intersections of race, class and gender and crime: Future directions for feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1, 27-47.

10.

Caplan

J. M.

Kennedy

L. W.

Barnum

J. S.

Piza

E. L.

(2017). Crime in context: Utilizing risk terrain modeling and conjunctive analysis of case configurations to explore the dynamics of criminogenic behavior settings. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 133-151.

11.

Cardarelli

A. P.

Cavanagh

(1994, November). Uncleared homicides in the United States: An exploratory study of trends and patterns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Miami, FL.

12.

Carter

(2013). Homicide process mapping: Best practices for increasing homicide clearances. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.

13.

Carter

(2016). Effective police homicide investigations: Evidence from seven cities with high clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 20, 150-176.

14.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, Article 8.

15.

Drawve

Thomas

S. A.

Hart

T. C.

(2017). Routine activity theory and the likelihood of arrest: A replication and extension with conjunctive methods. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 121-132.

16.

Eck

J. E.

(1992). Criminal investigation. In Cordner

Hale

(Eds.), What works in policing? Operations and administration examined (pp. 19-34). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

17.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hindelang

M. J.

(1979). A study of the behavior of law. American Sociological Review, 44, 3-18.

18.

Greenwood

Chaiken

Petersilia

(1977). The investigation process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

19.

Greenwood

Petersilia

(1975). The criminal investigative process—Volume 1: Summary and policy implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

20.

Hart

T. C.

Miethe

T. D.

(2008). Exploring bystander presence and intervention in nonfatal violent victimization: When does helping really help? Violence & Victims, 23, 637-651.

21.

Hart

T. C.

Miethe

T. D.

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2014). Contextualizing sentencing disparities: Using conjunctive analysis of case configurations to identify patterns of variability. Criminal Justice Studies, 27, 344-361.

22.

Hart

T. C.

Rennison

C. M.

Miethe

T. D.

(2017). Identifying patterns of situational clustering and contextual variability in criminological data: An overview of conjunctive analysis of case configurations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 112-120.

23.

Hawk

S. R.

(2015). A multi-method examination of homicide investigations on case outcomes. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

24.

Heng Choon

Beauregard

. (2016). Choice of weapon or weapon of choice? Examining the interactions between victim characteristics in single-victim male sexual homicide offenders. Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling, 13, 70-88.

25.

Jarvis

J. P.

(2015). Examining National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data: Perspectives from a quarter century of analysis efforts. Justice Research and Policy, 16, 195-210.

26.

Jarvis

J. P.

Mancik

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2017). Police responses to violent crime: Reconsidering mobilization of law. Criminal Justice Review, 42, 5-25.

27.

Jarvis

J. P.

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2009). Homicide clearances: An analysis of arrest versus exceptional outcomes. Homicide Studies, 13, 174-188.

28.

Jensen

C. J.

(2003). A test of bounded rationality in police investigative decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.

29.

Keel

Jarvis

Muirhead

(2009). An exploratory analysis of factors affecting homicide investigations. Homicide Studies, 13, 50-68.

30.

Klinger

D. A.

(1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306.

31.

Koetzle Shaffer

Miethe

T. D

. (2011). Are similar sex offenders treated similarly? A conjunctive analysis of disparities in community notification decisions. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 448-471.

32.

Lee

(2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles county. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 527-534.

33.

Litwin

K. J.

(2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 327-351.

34.

Litwin

K. J.

(2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11, 94-114.

35.

Lockwood

Hart

T. C.

Stewart

(2015). First nations peoples and judicial sentencing: Main effects and the impact of contextual variability. British Journal of Criminology, 55, 769-789.

36.

Marché

G. E.

(1994). The production of homicide solutions: An empirical analysis. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53, 385-401.

37.

McEwen

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2015). Forensic evidence in homicide investigations and prosecutions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60, 1188-1198.

38.

Mieczkowski

Beauregard

(2010). Lethal outcome in sexual assault events: A conjunctive analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 332-361.

39.

Miethe

T. D.

Hart

T. C.

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2008). The conjunctive analysis of case configurations: An exploratory method for discrete multivariate analysis of crime data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 227-241.

40.

Miethe

T. D.

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2004). Rethinking homicide: Exploring the structure and process underlying deadly situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Miethe

T. D.

Troshynski

E. I.

Hart

T. C.

(2017). Social conditions and cross-national imprisonment rates: Using set-theoretic methods for theory testing and identifying deviant cases. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 152-172.

42.

Mouzos

Muller

(2001). Solvability factors of homicide in Australia: An exploratory analysis. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

43.

Potter

(2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. London, England: Routledge.

44.

Puckett

J. L.

Lundman

R. J.

(2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 171-193.

45.

Regoeczi

W. C.

Jarvis

J. P.

(2013). Beyond the social production of homicide rates: Extending social disorganization theory to explain homicide case outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 30, 983-1014.

46.

Regoeczi

W. C.

Jarvis

J. P.

Riedel

(2008). Clearing murders: Is it about time? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 142-162.

47.

Regoeczi

W. C.

Kennedy

L. W.

Silverman

R. A.

(2000). Uncleared homicide: A Canada/United States comparison. Homicide Studies, 4, 135-161.

48.

Rennison

C. M.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(2017). Situational contexts of rural violence: A comparison of male and female perpetration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 189-206.

49.

Rennison

C. M.

Dragiewicz

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(2013). Context matters: Violence against women and reporting to police in rural, suburban, and urban areas. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 141-159.

50.

Riedel

Boulahanis

J. G.

(2007). Homicides exceptionally cleared and cleared by arrest: An exploratory study of police/prosecutor outcomes. Homicide Studies, 11, 151-164.

51.

Riedel

Rinehart

T. A.

(1996). Murder clearances and missing data. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19, 83-102.

52.

Rinehart

T. A.

(1994). An analysis of murder clearances in Chicago: 1981-1991 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Center for the Study of Crime, Delinquency, and Corrections, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

53.

Roberts

(2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11, 82-93.

54.

Roberts

(2009). Contributions of the National Incident-Based Reporting System to substantive knowledge in criminology: A review of research. Sociology Compass, 3, 433-458.

55.

Roberts

J. M.

(2016). Crime clearance and temporal variation in police investigative workload: Evidence from National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 651-674.

56.

Schroeder

D. A.

White

M. D.

(2009). Exploring the use of DNA evidence in homicide investigations: Implications for detective work and case clearance. Police Quarterly, 12, 319-342.

57.

Sudnow

(1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.

58.

Taylor

J. T.

Holleran

Topalli

(2009). Racial bias in case processing: Does victim race affect police clearance of violent crime? Justice Quarterly, 26, 562-591.

59.

Venger

(2017). Media freedom and the control of nation’s sociolegal problems of governance: A conjunctive analysis of asymmetric effects and multiple causal pathways. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 173-188.

60.

Wellford

Cronin

(1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multistate study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.

61.

Wolfgang

M. E.

(1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

62.

Wright

Decker

(1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.