Integrating crime pattern theory with tenets of social network theory, we argue that linking people who frequent the same places reveals intersecting behavioral patterns illustrative of case connectivity. Using the Green River serial murder investigation as a case study, we demonstrate that structural statistics may be useful in focusing investigative efforts. Significant shifts in the centrality of suspects emerge when we track the evolution of this case at 6-month increments, suggesting that the initial working case hypothesis misled investigators. Continued exploration into the utility of social network analysis (SNA) for tactical purposes will help advance applied criminology.
AllenJ.JamesA.GamlenP. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: A case study using social network analysis. R&D Management, 37, 179-196.
2.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
BichlerG.MalmA.EnriquezJ. (2014). Magnetic facilities: Identifying convergence settings of juvenile delinquents. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 971-998.
4.
BichlerG.SchmerlerK.EnriquezJ. (2013). Curbing nuisance motels: An evaluation of police as place regulators. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36, 437-462.
5.
BichlerG.SchoepferA.BushS. (2015). White-collars and Black ties: Interlocking social circles of elite corporate offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 279-296.
6.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
BorgattiS. P.Lopez-KidwellV. (2011). Network theory. In ScottJ.CarringtonP. J. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 40-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York, NY: Macmillan.
10.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 78-93). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
11.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.
12.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1995). The criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5-26.
13.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (2015). Understanding crime with computational topology. In AndresenM. A.FarrellG. (Eds.), The Criminal Act: The role and influence of routine activity theory (pp. 78-93). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
BrowningC. R.SollerB. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape (Washington, D.C.), 16, 165-196.
15.
BurtR. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CalderoniF. (2015). Network analysis of organized crime meetings as a tool for the identification of leadership positions. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 89-110). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
17.
CampanaP. (2011). Eavesdropping on the mob: The functional diversification of mafia activities across territories. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 213-228.
18.
CarringtonP. J. (2011). Crime and social networks. In ScottJ.CarringtonP. J. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 236-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
ChristakisN. K.FowlerJ. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Hachette Book Group.
20.
Décary-HétuD.MorselliC.Leman-LangloisS. (2011). Welcome to the scene: A study of social organization and recognition among Warez Hackers. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 49, 359-382.
21.
EvertonS. F.CunninghamD. (2014). Terrorist network adaptation to a changing environment. In MorselliC. (Ed.), Crime and networks (pp. 287-308). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
FeldS. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.
23.
FelsonM. (2006). Crime and nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
FosterB. L.SeidmanS. B. (1984). Overlap structure of ceremonial events in two Thai villages. Thai Journal of Development Administration, 24, 143-157.
25.
FreemanL. C. (1980). Q-analysis and the structure of friendship networks. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12, 367-378.
26.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445-471.
27.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
28.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
29.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
30.
GrundT. U.DensleyJ. A. (2015). Ethnic homophily and triad closure: Mapping internal gang structure using exponential random graph models. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 354-370.
JanicikG. A.LarrickR. P. (2005). Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 348-364.
35.
JoffresK.BouchardM. (2015). Vulnerabilities in online child exploitation networks. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 153-176). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
36.
KadushinC. (1966). The friends and supporters of psychotherapy: On social circles in urban life. American Sociological Review, 31, 786-802.
37.
KennedyD.BragaA.PiehlA. (1997). The (un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In WeisburdD.McEwenT. (Eds.), Crime mapping and crime prevention (pp. 219-262). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
38.
KnokeD.YangS. (2008). Social networks analysis (2nd ed.) (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 154). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
MalmA.BichlerG. (2013). Using friends for money: The positional importance of money-launderers in organized crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 16, 365-381.
40.
McGloinJ. M.RowanZ. (2015). Street gangs and co-offending networks. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 9-25). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
41.
MontgomeryJ. E. (1993). Organizational survival: Continuity or crisis? In LaytonM. (Ed.), Policing in the global community: The challenge of leadership (pp. 133-142). Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
42.
MorselliC.PetitK. (2007). Law-Enforcement Disruption of a Drug Importation Network. Global Crime, 8(2): 109-130.
43.
PapachristosA. V. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 74-128.
44.
PapachristosA. V. (2011). The coming of a networked criminology?Advances in Criminological Theory, 17, 101-140.
45.
ReichertD. (2004). Chasing the devil: My twenty-year quest to capture the Green River Killer. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
46.
RossmoD. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. New York, NY: CRC Press.
47.
RossmoD. K. (2009). Criminal investigative failures. New York, NY: CRC Press.
48.
Sierra-ArevaloM.PapachristosA. V. (2015). Applying group audits to problem-oriented policing. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 27-46). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
49.
SmithC.GuillenT. (1991). The search for the Green River Killer: A true crime shocker. New York, NY: Penguin Putnam.
50.
SnijdersT.VanDeBuntG.SteglichG. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
51.
SparrowM. S. (1991). The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: An assessment of the prospects. Social Networks, 13, 251-274.
52.
State of Washington vs. Gary Leon Ridgway. Prosecutor’s Summary of the Evidence. No. 01-1-10270-9 SEA Superior Court of Washington for King County.
53.
TitaG.RadilS. (2011). Spatializing the social networks of gangs to explore patterns of violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 521-545.
54.
UzziB. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
55.
Van der HulstR. C. (2009). Introduction to social network analysis (SNA) as an investigative tool. Trends in Organized Crime, 12, 101-121.
56.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
YoungJ. T. N.ReadyJ. T. (2015). Diffusion of ideas and technology: The role of networks in influencing the endorsement and use of on-officer video cameras. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 243-261.
