Examining homicide across Brazil’s 5,562 municipalities, we find that violence nearby has a positive effect on local violence (diffusion effect), violence exerts an unusual negative spatial effect in small clusters of communities in northeastern Brazil, and a prominent poverty-reduction program (Bolsa Família [BF]) has mixed effects. The spatial dimensions of violence complement existing non-spatial research on violence in Brazil, and the results regarding BF offer a spatial complement to research on conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs, clarifying the sources of violence in Latin America’s largest country and shedding light on the content and geographic targeting of violence reduction policies.
AchenC. (2000, July20-22). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, University of California, Los Angeles.
2.
AlstonL.LibecapG.MuellerB. (2000). Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 162-188.
3.
AssunçãoR. MReisE. A. (1999). A new proposal to adjust Moran’s I for population density. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2147-2162.
4.
The AmericasBarometer by the Latin American Public Opinion Project. (n.d). Available from www.LapopSurveys.org
5.
AnselinL. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
6.
AnselinL.ReyS. J. (2014). Modern spatial econometric in practice. Chicago, IL: GeoDa Press.
BallerR. D.AnselinL.MessnerS. F.DeaneG.HawkinsD. F. (2001). Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects. Criminology, 39, 561-588.
9.
BaumerE.WolffK. (2014). The breadth and causes of contemporary cross-national homicide trends. Crime & Justice, 43, 231-287.
10.
BergmanM.WhiteheadL. (Eds.). (2009). Criminality, public security, and the challenge to democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
BrownfieldW. (2015, March24). Statement before the house appropriations subcommittee on state, foreign operations, and related programs. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/rm/2015/239768.htm
12.
BrunsdonC.FotheringhamA. S.CharltonM. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28, 281-298.
13.
BrunsdonC.FotheringhamA. S.CharltonM. (1999). Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science, 39, 497-524.
14.
CaldeiraT.HolstonJ. (1999). Democracy and violence in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41, 691-729.
15.
CamachoA.MejiaC. (2013). The externalities of conditional cash transfer programs on crime: The case of Familias en Acción in Bogota. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://lacer.lacea.org/handle/123456789/12539?show=full
CharltonM.FotheringhamA. S.BrunsdonC. (2009). Geographically weighted regression (White Paper). National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland Maynooth. Maynooth, Ireland.
18.
ChiodaL.de MelloJ.SoaresR. (2015). Spillovers from conditional cash transfer programs: Bolsa Família and crime in urban Brazil. Economics of Education Review. Retrieved from doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.005
19.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-605.
20.
Conselho Indigenista Missionário [CIMI]. (2014). Violence against Indigenous Peoples in Brazil - 2014 Data. Missionary Council for Indigenous Peoples(Conselho Indigenista Missionário, CIMI), under the umbrella of the National Conference of Bishops of Brasil (Conferência Nacional dos Bispos do Brasil, CNBB). Brasilia, Brazil. Retrieved from www.cimi.org.br
21.
CrostB.FelterJ. H.JohnstonP. B. (2016). Conditional cash transfers, civil conflict and insurgent influence: Experimental evidence from the Philippines. Journal of Development Economics, 118, 171-182.
22.
DeaneG.MessnerS. F.StuckyT. D.McGeeverK.KubrinC. E. (2008). Not “islands, entire of themselves”: Exploring the spatial context of city-level robbery rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 363-380.
23.
DarmofalD. (2015). Spatial analysis for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DowM. M. (2007). Galton’s problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects: Cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 336-363.
25.
DubeA.DubeO.Garcia-PonceO. (2013). Cross-border spillover: U.S. gun laws and violence in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 107, 397-417.
26.
FotheringhamA. S.BrunsdonC.CharltonM. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. West Sussex, England: John Wiley.
27.
GolliniI.LuB.CharltonM.BrunsdonC.HarrisP. (2015). GWmodel: An R package for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models. Journal of Statistical Software, 63(17), 1-50.
28.
HarbersI.IngramM. C. (2015, September). Geo-nested analysis: Mixed-methods research with spatially dependent data. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Political Science Association. San Francisco, CA.
29.
HilbinkL. (2012). The origins of positive judicial independence. World Politics, 64, 587-621.
30.
HunterW.SugiyamaN. B. (2014). Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 829-845.
31.
IngramM. C. (2016a). Crafting courts in new democracies: The politics of subnational judicial reform in Brazil and Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
IngramM. C. (2016b). Mandates, geography, and networks: Diffusion of criminal procedure reform in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 58, 121-145.
33.
IngramM. C. (2016c). Networked justice: Judges, the diffusion of ideas, and legal reform movements in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 48(4) [forthcoming Nov.].
34.
IngramM. C.Marchesini da CostaM. (2014). Targeting violence reduction in Brazil: Policy implications from a spatial analysis of homicide (Policy brief). Latin America Initiative - Foreign Policy at Brookings, Brookings Institution (October). Washington, DC.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografia [INEGI]. (2015). Encuesta Nacional de Victimización y Percepción sobre Seguridad Pública (ENVIPE) [National Survey of Victimization and Perception of Public Security]. Mexico City, Mexico.
37.
KelejianH.RobinsonD. (1993). A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditures model. Papers in Regional Science, 72, 297-312.
38.
KoeselK. J.BunceV. J. (2013). Diffusion-proofing: Russian and Chinese responses to waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 753-768.
39.
LanceJ. E. (2014). Conditional cash transfers and the effect on recent murder rates in Brazil and Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 56, 55-72.
40.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space?American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
41.
LangerM. (2007). Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: Diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. American Journal of Comparative Law, 55, 617-676.
42.
LondoñoJ. L.GuerreroR. (1999). Violencia en América Latina: Epidemiología y costos (Documento de Trabajo R-375) [Violence in Latin America: Epidemiology and costs (Working Paper R-375)]. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo [Inter-American Development Bank].
43.
LoureiroA. O. F. (2013). Essays on Crime, Hysteresis, Poverty and Conditional Cash Transfers. PhD Diss. University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/7913
44.
MatthewsS. A.YangT.-C. (2012). Mapping the results of local statistics: Using geographically weighted regression. Demographic Research, 26, 151-166.
45.
MessnerS. F.AnselinL.BallerR. D.HawkinsD. F.DeaneG.TolnayS. E. (1999). The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: An application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 423-450.
46.
NaimM. (2012). La gente mas asesina del mundo [The most murderous people in the world]. El País Internacional. Madrid, Spain.
47.
PáezA.FarberS.WheelerD. (2011). A simulation-based study of geographically weighted regression as a method for investigating spatially varying relationships. Environment and Planning-Part A, 43, 2992-3010.
48.
PáezA.UchidaT.MiyamotoK. (2002). A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models: 2. Spatial association and model specification tests. Environment and Planning A, 34, 883-904.
49.
PatrickS. (2011). Weak links: Fragile states, global threats, and international security. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
PridemoreW. A. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality–homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 739-772.
51.
RaphaelS.Winter-EbmerR. (2001). Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 259-283.
52.
RogersE. M. (2003 [1962]). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed.New York: Free Press.
53.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
54.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent Crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
57.
ShoffC.ChenV.YangT. C. (2014). When homogeneity meets heterogeneity: The geographically weighted regression with spatial lag approach to prenatal care utilization. Geospatial Health, 8, 557-568.
58.
SimmonsB. A.DobbinF.GarrettG. (Eds.). (2008). The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SimmonsC. S. (2004). The political economy of land conflict in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 183-206.
60.
SnyderR. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 93-110.
61.
SparksC. S. (2011). Violent crime in San Antonio, Texas: An application of spatial epidemiological methods. Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology, 2, 301-309.
62.
ThompsonS. K.GartnerR. (2014). The Spatial distribution and social context of homicide in Toronto’s neighborhoods. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 51, 88-118.
63.
TolnayS. E.DeaneG.BeckE. M. (1996). Vicarious violence: Spatial effects on southern lynchings, 1890-1919. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 788-815.
VilaltaC.MuggahR. (2014). Violent disorder in Ciudad Juárez: A spatial analysis of homicide. Trends in Organized Crime, 17, 161-180.
67.
WheelerD.TiefelsdorfM. (2005). Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7, 161-187.
