We investigated the precision of Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) homicide rate estimates for large U.S. cities during the 5 years, 1998-2002. The homicide rates based on the National Vital Statistics System provided a parallel measure and the basis for estimating the reliability and average error. When cities with incomplete SHR data were removed from the sample, the estimated reliability was high (.99), and the standard error of measurement was low (1.2 homicides per 100,000 residents). Reliability remained high for subsets of cities and for most subsets of victims. For some groups, however, such as African Americans and persons age 0 to 14, the reliability was much lower.
AndersonR. N.MiniñoA. M.HoyertD. L.RosenbergH. N. (2001). Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: Preliminary estimates (National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 1-32). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_02.pdf
2.
BazleyT. D.MieczkowskiT. (2004). Researching workplace homicide: An assessment of the limitations of the Supplementary Homicide Report. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32. 243-252. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.02.004
3.
BlockC. R.PattersonT. D.DickD. (1999). Quality of Chicago Supplementary Homicide Reports data compared to the Chicago homicide dataset. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. Retrieved from http://www.icjia.org/Public/pdf/bulletins/SHR_CHD_9_13_19991.pdf
4.
BragaA. A.PiehlA. M.KennedyD. M. (1999). Youth homicide in Boston: An assessment of Supplementary Homicide Report data. Homicide Studies, 3, 277-299. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088767999003004002
5.
CantorD.CohenL. E. (1980). Comparing measures of homicide trends: Methodological and substantive differences in the Vital Statistics and Uniform Crime Report time series (1933-1975). Social Science Research, 9, 121-145. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(80)90002-2
6.
ComstockR. D.MalloneeS.JordanF. (2005). A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury. Injury Prevention, 11, 58-63. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2004.007567
7.
CrumeT. L.DiGuiseppiC.ByersT.SirotnakA. P.GarrettC. J. (2002). Underascertainment of child maltreatment fatalities by death certificates, 1990-1998. Pediatrics, 110, Article e18. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.2.e18
8.
DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (2010). On the validity and reliability of gang homicide: A comparison of disparate sources. Homicide Studies, 14, 359-376. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/1088767910385400
9.
EwigmanB.KivlahanC.LandG. (1993). The Missouri child fatality study: Underreporting of maltreatment fatalities among children younger than five years of age, 1983 through 1986. Pediatrics, 91, 330-337. Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/91/2/330.short
10.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1984). Uniform crime reporting handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Uniform crime reporting handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
FeldtL. S.BrennanR. L. (1989). Reliability. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
14.
FoxJ. A. (2004). Missing data problems in the SHR: Imputing offender and relationship characteristics. Homicide Studies, 8, 214-254. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/1088767904265592
15.
FoxJ. A. (2007). Uniform crime reports (United States): Supplementary homicide reports, 1976-2004 [Computer file and codebook]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20100.v1
16.
FoxJ. A.LevinJ. (1994). Firing back: The growing threat of workplace homicide. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 536, 16-30. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716294536001002
17.
FoxJ. A.PierceG. L. (1986). Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-1983. Final report to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Part II. In FoxJ. A.PierceG. L. (2002). Uniform Crime Reports [United States: Supplementary Homicide Reports. 1976-1983] (Codebook). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08657.v1
18.
FullerW. A. (1987). Measurement error models. New York, NY: Wiley.
19.
GoldbergerA. S. (1973). Structural equation models: An overview. In GoldbergerA. S.DuncanO. D. (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Seminar Press.
20.
GulliksenH. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
HindelangM. J. (1974). The uniform crime reports revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 1-17.
22.
JasonJ.CarpenterM. M.TylerC. W. (1983). Underrecording of infant homicide in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 73, 195-197. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.73.2.195
23.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
24.
LangfordL.IsaacN.KabatS. (1998). Homicide related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts: Examining case ascertainment and validity of the SHR. Homicide Studies, 2, 353-377. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088767998002004002
25.
LapidusG. D.GregorioD. I.HansenH. (1990). Misclassification of childhood homicide on death certificates. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 213-214. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.80.2.213
26.
LoftinC. (1986). The validity of robbery-murder classifications in Baltimore. Violence and Victims, 1, 191-204.
27.
LoftinC.McDowallD.FetzerM. D. (2008). A comparison of SHR and vital statistics homicide estimates for U.S. cities. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 4-17. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043986207312585
28.
LoftinC.WiersemaB.McDowallD.DobrinA. (2003). Underreporting of justifiable homicides committed by police officers in the United States, 1976-1998. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1117-1121. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1117
29.
LordF. M.NovickM. R. (with BirnbaumA.). (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
LymanJ. M.McGwinG.Jr.DavisG.KovandzicT. V.KingW.VermundS. H. (2004). A comparison of three sources of data on child homicide. Death Studies, 28, 659-669. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07481180490476515
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
MoyerL. A.BoyleC. A.PollockD. A. (1989). Validity of death certificates for injury-related causes of death. American Journal of Epidemiology, 130, 1024-1032.
35.
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. (2006). Law enforcement agency identifiers crosswalk [United States], 2005. [Computer file and codebook]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04634.v1
National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). Technical appendix: Vital statistics of the United States 1999-mortality. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/techap99.pdf
38.
ParkerR. N.SmithM. D. (1979). Deterrence, poverty, and type of homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 614-624.
39.
PizarroJ. M.ZeoliA. M. (2013). An assessment of the quality of homicide data in the Supplementary Homicide Reports: A research note. Justice Quarterly, 30, 711-731. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624113
40.
QuinetK. (2007). The missing missing: Toward a quantification of serial murder victimization in the United States. Homicide Studies, 11, 319-339. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088767907307467
41.
RandM. R. (1993). The study of homicide caseflow: Creating a comprehensive homicide dataset. In BlockR.BlockR. (Eds.), Questions and answers in lethal and non-lethal violence: Proceedings of the second annual workshop of the Homicide Research Working Group, June 13-17, 1993 (pp. 103-118). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://homicideworkinggroup.cos.ucf.edu/include/documents/hrwg93.pdf
42.
RiedelM. (1990). Nationwide homicide data sets: An evaluation of the Uniform Crime Reports and National Center for Health Statistics data. In MacKenzieD. L.BaunachP. J.RobergR. R. (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale, long-range efforts (pp. 75-205). Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
RiedelM. (1999). Sources of homicide data. In SmithM. D.ZahnM. A. (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 75-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RiedelM.RegoecziW. C. (2006). A case-by-case comparison of the classification of law enforcement and vital statistics data on homicide. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 61-82. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0887403405278087
46.
RiedelM.RozhonD. (2005). A case-by-case comparison of police justifiable homicides and legal intervention homicides. In SalfatiC. G. (Ed.), Homicide research: Past, present and future: Proceedings of the 2005 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 130-142). Chicago, IL: Homicide Research Working Group. Retrieved from http://homicideworkinggroup.cos.ucf.edu/include/documents/HRWG%20PROCEEDINGS%202005.pdf
47.
RokawW. M.MercyJ.SmithJ. (1990). Comparing death certificate data with FBI crime reporting statistics on U.S. homicides. Public Health Reports, 105, 447-455. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1580099
48.
RosenbergH. M.FreedmanM. A. (2000). Accurate ascertainment of child-abuse mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 337-338.
49.
ShermanL. W.LangworthyR. H. (1979). Measuring homicide by police officers. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 546-560. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1142641
50.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). County and city data book: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Van CourtJ.TrentR. B. (2003). Matching homicide reports and death records in California. In SmithM. D.BlackmanP. H.JarvisJ. P. (Eds.), New directions in homicide research: Proceedings of the 2001 annual meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 96-99). Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved from http://homicideworkinggroup.cos.ucf.edu/include/documents/hrwg01.pdf
53.
Van CourtJ.TrentR. B. (2004). Why didn’t we get them all?: Analyzing unlinked records in California’s Linked Homicide File. Homicide Studies, 8, 311-321. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088767904265433
54.
WiersemaB.LoftinC.McDowallD. (2000). A comparison of SHR and vital statistics homicide estimates for U.S. counties. Homicide Studies, 4, 317-340. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088767900004004002
55.
WiersemaB.LoftinC.MullenR. C.DaubE. M.SheppardM. A.SmialekJ. E.McDowallD. (1998). Fatal firearm-related injury surveillance in Maryland. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15 (3 Suppl), 46-56. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00055-5
56.
WilliamsK. R.FlewellingR. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rate calculations. Criminology, 25, 543-560. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00810.x
57.
ZahnM. A.RiedelM. (1983). National versus local data sources in the study of homicide: Do they agree? In WaldoG. P. (Ed.), Measurement issues in criminal justice (pp. 103-120). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
