There has beena surge in recentyears in the useof counties as the unit of analysis in homicide research. Employing county-level data, however, can create several problems. In some cases, these problems can be overcome with various methodological procedures. Yet these procedures are not magic, and they assume the use of valid data. Recent measurement and methodological research examining county-level data, however, reveals serious reporting errors in the Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) data, that agreement between reporting systems at the county level is not strong, and that the amount of person-time at risk in many counties is simply too small to generate a reliable estimate of the homicide rate. Despite theselimitations, homicide studiesusing thesesmall counties continue be carried out without heeding these previous warnings. This article is thus meant to provide a review of the limitations and to urge caution when employing county-level homicide data.
Bachman, R. (1992). Crime in nonmetropolitan America: A national accounting of trends, incidence rates, and idiosyncratic vulnerabilities. Rural Sociology, 57, 546-560.
2.
Baller, R. D., Anselin, L., Messner, S. F., Deane, G., & Hawkins, D. F. (2001). Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects. Criminology, 39, 561-590.
3.
Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Chin, H. C., & Quddus, M. A. (2003). Modeling count data with excess zeroes. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 90-116.
6.
Chu, R., Rivera, C., & Loftin, C. (2000). Herding and homicide: An examination of the Nisbett-Reaves hypothesis. Social Forces, 78, 971-987.
7.
Cohen, D. (1998). Culture, social organization, and patterns of violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 408-419.
8.
Hannon, L., & Knapp, P. (2003). Reassessing nonlinearity in the urban disadvantage/violent crime relationship: An example of methodological bias from log transformation. Criminology, 41, 1427-1448.
9.
Heilbron, D. C. (1994). Zero-altered and other regression models for count data with added zeroes. Biometrical Journal, 36, 531-547.
10.
Kovandzic, T. V., Vieraitis, L. M., & Yeisley, M. R. (1998). The structural covariates of urban homicide: Reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the post-Reagan era. Criminology, 36, 569-599.
11.
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-14.
12.
Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
13.
Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Nagin, D. S. (1996). A comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed Poisson regression models with empirical applications to criminal careers data. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 387-442.
14.
Loftin, C., & McDowall, D. (2003). Regional culture and patterns of homicide. Homicide Studies, 7, 353-367.
15.
Lott, J. R., Jr. (1998). More guns, less crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Lott, J. R., Jr., & Mustard, D. B. (1997). Crime, deterrence, and right-to-carry concealed handguns. Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 1-68.
17.
Maltz, M. D. (1999). Bridging gaps in police crime data (NCJ 176365).Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/bgpcd.htm
18.
Maltz, M. D., & Targonski, J. (2002). A note on the use of county-level UCR data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 297-318.
19.
Maltz, M. D., & Targonski, J. (2003). Measurement and other errors in county-level UCR data: A reply to Lott and Whitley. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 199-206.
20.
Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and U.S.regional culture. American Psychologist, 48, 441-449.
21.
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21-43.
23.
Osgood, D. W., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Social disorganizationoutside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38, 81-115.
24.
Petee, T. A., & Kowalski, G. S. (1993). Modeling rural violent crime rates: Atest of social disorganization theory. Sociological Focus, 26, 87-89.
25.
Pridemore, W. A., & Freilich, J. D. (in press). A test of recent subcultural explanations of White violence in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice.
26.
Rivera, C., Chu, R., & Loftin, C. (2002). Do strong communities increase homicide? An evaluation of the Nisbett-Cohen thesis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22(7/8), 109-121.
27.
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
28.
Rokaw, W. M., Mercy, J. A., & Smith, J. C. (1990). Comparing death certificate data with FBI crime reporting statistics on U. S. homicides. Public Health Reports, 105, 447-455.
29.
Shankar, V. N., Milton, J. C., & Mannering, F. L. (1997). Modeling accident frequencies as zero-altered probability processes: An empirical inquiry. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 829-837.
30.
Smith, B. L., & Huff, C. R. (1982). Crime in the country: The vulnerability and victimization of rural citizens. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 271-282.
31.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2003). Census summary file tape 3. Available at www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2002/sumfile3.html
32.
U. S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2003). Uniform Crime Reporting program data [United States]: County-level detailed arrest and offense data, 2001 [Computer file, ICPSR ed.]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. Available at www.icpsr.umich.edu:8080/NACJD-STUDY/03721.xml
33.
Weisheit, R. A., & Wells, L. E. (1996). Rural crime and justice: Implications for theory and research. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 379-397.
34.
Wiersema, B., Loftin, C., & McDowall, D. (2000). A comparison of Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Vital Statistics System homicide estimates for U.S. counties. Homicide Studies, 4, 317-340.
