Margo Wilson and collaborators discovered that cohabiting couples had very much higher spousal homicide rates than those in registered marriages, and cross-national research has shown this difference to be widespread. We now find that homicide rates in the two sorts of unions have converged in the United States, such that the previously large difference had completely vanished by 2005. Distinct age patterns whereby registered marriages are most lethal in youth and cohabitation is most lethal in middle age have nevertheless persisted. While their homicide rates were converging between 1990 and 2005, married and cohabiting couples were not growing more similar in their basic demographic attributes: age distributions and unemployment rates remained distinct, and differences in education and income actually increased. Why homicide rates in the two classes of unions have ceased to differ remains unknown. We suggest some lines of research that may help provide answers.
BaughmanR.Dickert-ConlinS.HouserS. (2002). How well can we track cohabitation using the SIPP? A consideration of direct and inferred measures. Demography, 39, 455-465.
2.
BorooahV. K. (2002). Does unemployment make men less “marriageable”?Applied Economics, 34, 1571-1582.
3.
BrewerV. E.PaulsenD. J. (1999). A comparison of U.S. and Canadian findings on uxoricide risk for women with children sired by previous partners. Homicide Studies, 3, 317-332.
4.
BrownS. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583-601.
5.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615-625.
6.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.. . .LaughonK. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097.
7.
DalyM.WilsonM. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
8.
DalyM.WilsonM. I. (1996). Evolutionary psychology and marital conflict: The relevance of stepchildren. In BussD. M.MalamuthN. (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 9-28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
DalyM.WisemanK. A.WilsonM. (1997). Women with children sired by previous partners incur excess risk of uxoricide. Homicide Studies, 1, 61-71.
10.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
ForsteR.TanferK. (1996). Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting and married women. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 58, 33-47.
13.
FoxJ. A.SwattM. L. (2009). Uniform crime reports (United States): Supplementary homicide reports with multiple imputation, cumulative files1976-2007 (ICPSR24801-v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
14.
FoxJ. A.ZawitzM. W. (2007). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
HardieJ. H.LucasA. (2010). Economic factors and relationship quality among young couples: Comparing cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 72, 1141-1154.
16.
JamesB. (2011). Recent trends in intimate partner homicide risk in North America: Cohabiting and married victims (Unpublished master’s thesis). McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
17.
LichterD. T.TurnerR. N.SasslerS. (2010). National estimates of the rise in serial cohabitation. Social Science Research, 39, 754-765
18.
MouzosJ.ShackelfordT.K. (2004). A comparative, cross-national analysis of partner-killing by women in cohabiting and marital relationships in Australia and the United States. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 206-216.
19.
ProkosA. H.KeeneJ. R. (2010). Poverty among cohabiting gay and lesbian, and married and cohabiting heterosexual families. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 934-959.
20.
PuzoneC. A.SaltzmanL. E.KresnowM.ThompsonM. P.MercyJ. A. (2000). National trends in intimate partner homicide. Violence Against Women, 6, 409-426.
21.
RindfussR. R.VandenheuvelA. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single. Population & Development Review, 16, 703-726.
22.
RugglesS.AlexanderJ. T.GenadekK.GoekenR.SchroederM. B.SobekM. (2010). The American community survey. Integrated public use microdata series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
23.
ShackelfordT. K. (2001a). Partner-killing by women in cohabiting relationships and marital relationships. Homicide Studies, 5, 253-266.
24.
ShackelfordT. K. (2001b). Cohabitation, marriage and murder: Woman-killing by male romantic partners. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 284-291.
25.
ShackelfordT. K.MouzosJ. (2005). Partner killing by men in cohabiting and marital relationships: A comparative, cross-national analysis of data from Australia and the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1310-1324.
26.
Statistics Canada. (2004). General social survey: Family structure, by region, occasional, 1995 & 2001 (Table 112-0001). Retrieved from http://estat.statcan.gc.ca/
27.
StewartS. D. (2001). Contemporary American step parenthood: Integrating cohabiting and nonresident stepparents. Population Research & Policy Review, 20, 345-364.
28.
TreasJ.GiesenD. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 48-60.
29.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1992). Census of population and housing. Public use microdata sample U.S. technical documentation 1990. Washington, DC: Author.
WilsonM. I.DalyM. (1992a). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289-322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
WilsonM. I.DalyM. (1992b). Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology, 30, 189-215.
WilsonM. I.DalyM. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 2-7.
35.
WilsonM. I.DalyM. (1998). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives and the evolutionary psychology of male sexual proprietariness. In DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against wives (pp. 199-230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
WilsonM. I.DalyM. (2001). The evolutionary psychology of couple conflict in registered versus de facto marital unions. In BoothA.CrouterA. C.ClementsM. (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 3-26). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
WilsonM. I.DalyM.WrightC. (1993). Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic risk patterns. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 263-291.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
