This article argues that the utilization of the criminal events perspective (CEP) can help advance the relatively young literature on serial offending. Much of the literature on serial offending understandably concentrates on the motivations of offenders, but the CEP views crime as an event that involves precursors to the act, the act itself, and the aftermath of the event, all of which occur in a social context. The CEP and the life course history method are used in this qualitative case study of a serial offender currently incarcerated in the southeastern United States. Data for this study come from a variety of sources, including semi-standardized interview data and data from police reports and interrogations. Theoretical and methodological implications of this study for future research on serial offending are discussed.
Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Angrosino, M. V. (2002). Conducting a life history interview. In M. V. Angrosino (Ed.), Doing cultural anthropology: Projects for ethnographic data collection (pp. 33-44). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
4.
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5.
Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (2001). The implications of the criminal event model for crime prevention. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy, & V. F. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: Criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 277-303). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
6.
Canter, D. (1994). Criminal shadows: Inside the mind of a serial killer. London:HarperCollins.
7.
Carnes, P. (2001). Out of the shadows: Understanding sexual addiction. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
8.
Castle, T., & Hensley, C. (2002). Serial killers with military experience: Applying learning theory to serial murder. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 453-465.
9.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-607.
10.
Cooley, C. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
11.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Egger, K. (2002). Victims: The “less dead.” In S. Egger (Ed.), The killers among us: An examination of serial murder and its investigation (pp. 83-99). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Egger, S. (1990). Serial murder: An elusive phenomenon. New York: Praeger.
14.
Egger, S. (2002). The killers among us: An examination of serial murder and its investigation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Hickey, E. (2002). Serial killers and their victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
17.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Holmes, R. M. (1998). Sequential predation: Elements of serial fatal victimization. In R. M. Holmes & S. T. Holmes (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on serial murder (pp. 101-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Holmes, R. M., DeBurger, J., & Holmes, S. T. (1998). Inside the mind of the serial murderer. In R. M. Holmes & S. T. Holmes (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on serial murder (pp. 113-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Holmes, S. T., Tewksbury, R., & Holmes, R. M. (1999). Fractured identity syndrome: Anew theory of serial murder. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(3), 262-272.
21.
James, E. (1991). Catching serial killers. Lansing, MI: International Forensic Services.
22.
Jenkins, P. (1994). Using murder: The social construction of serial homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
23.
Leibman, F. H. (1989). Serial murderers: Four case histories. Federal Probation, 53(4), 41-43.
24.
Levin, J., & Fox, J. A. (1985). Mass murder: America’s growing menace. New York: Plenum.
25.
Lisak, D., & Roth, S. (1988). Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 795-802.
26.
Lisak, D., & Roth, S. (1990). Motives and psychodynamics of self-reported, incarcerated rapists. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(2), 268-280.
27.
Meier, R. F. (2001). Macro models of criminal events. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy, & V. F. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: Criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 47-64). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
28.
Meier, R. F., Kennedy, L. W., & Sacco, V. F. (2001). Crime and the criminal events perspective. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy, & V. F. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: Criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 1-28). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
29.
Miethe, T. D., & Meier, R. F. (1994). Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Miller, J., & Schwarts, M. D. (1995). Rape myths and violence against street prostitutes. Deviant Behavior, 16(1), 1-23.
31.
Money, J. (1990). Forensic sexology: Paraphilic serial rape (biastophilia) and lust murder (erotophonophilia). American Journal of Psychotherapy, 44(1), 26-36.
32.
Newton, M. (1992). Serial slaughter. Port Townsend, WA: Loompanics.
33.
Nixon, K., Tutty, L., Downe, P., Gorkoff, K., & Ursel, J. (2002). The everyday occurrence: Violence in the lives of girls exploited through prostitution. Violence Against Women, 8(9), 1016-1043.
34.
Petee, T. A., & Jarvis, J. (2000). Analyzing violent serial offending. Homicide Studies, 4(3), 211-218.
35.
Pino, N. W., & Meier, R. F. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40(11/12), 979-990.
36.
Rappaport, R. (1988). The serial and mass murderers. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 39-48.
37.
Sacco, V. F., & Kennedy, L. W. (1996). The criminal event. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
Safarik, M., Jarvis, J., & Nussbaum, K. (2000). Elderly female serial sexual homicide: Alimited empirical test of criminal investigative analysis. Homicide Studies, 4(3), 294-307.
39.
Sears, D. (1991). To kill again. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
40.
Sexual Recovery Institute. (2000). The G-Sexual Addiction Screening Test (G-SAST). Retrieved August 5, 2002, from http://www.sexualrecovery.com/sri_docs/gasast.htm
41.
Shuy, R. W. (1982). Topic as the unit of analysis in a criminal law case. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 113-126). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
42.
Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology, 25, 893-911.
43.
Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Warr, M. (2001). Crime and opportunity: A theoretical essay. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy, & V. F. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: Criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 65-94). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
45.
Wertham, F. (1937). The catathymic crisis. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 37, 974-978.
46.
Williams, L. S. (1984). The classic rape: When do victims report?Social Problems, 31, 459-467.
